Europe faced with Gazprom’s gas monopoly

Tensions between Russia and Europe are reaching a climax this week, with a drastic drop in gas supplies. Struggle between Gazprom and Naftogaz.

Share:

Poutine Zelensky

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

Tensions between Russia and Europe reached a new climax this week. This is due to gas exports at their lowest level and growing tensions with Ukraine.

Europe faced with falling Russian gas exports

Since Monday December 20, 2021, Russian gas exports through the Yamal pipeline have been at their lowest level ever. Volumes to Europe, usually around 10 million kWh/h, fell to just 370,000 on December 20, 2021.

On Wednesday December 22, measurements ranged from 900,000 to 1.6 million kWh/h, depending on the point of passage. As a result, gas prices in the Netherlands rose by a further 16% to €171.40/MWh per month on Tuesday December 21. An umpteenth record broken in a very tense energy context for Europe.

Russian gas

The worst is yet to come

But the worst is yet to come. According to Ukrainian gas company Naftogaz, Gazprom has stopped communicating its purchase offers. What’s more, the company is said to have planned only 8.3 million kWh/h of capacity to Europe from Yamal in January 2022.

Gazprom denied any manipulation, arguing that priority was given to the Russian market during periods of extreme cold. According to Gazprom, the company is complying with the legal provisions agreed with Ukraine and Europe.

Ukraine calls on Europe to end Gazprom monopoly

Against this particularly tense backdrop, Naftogaz has submitted a request to the European Commission. The company is calling on Europe to take action against Gazprom’s monopoly, which, in its words, is negative.

“Gazprom’s actions are anti-competitive and have a fundamentally negative impact on all European consumers,” says Yuriy Vitrenko, Director of Naftogaz.

Dependence on Gazprom

Gazprom has a monopoly on Russian gas pipelines under a 2006 law. This gives the company total control over all transits to Europe via Russia. As a result, exports from Central Asia and private companies are also dependent on Gazprom, which is over 50% owned by the Russian state.

An untenable situation for the Ukraine, which in fact depends on Russia for its energy supplies. The same goes for Europe, where a third of gas consumption is chartered from the Russian giant.

Russia the big winner in the crisis?

Naturally, this situation benefits Gazprom, which reaps the rewards of soaring gas prices. For 2021, the company should exceed €30 billion in profits, following record revenues between July and September 2021. Similarly, 2022 is set to see further price inflation and record profits.

However, this supremacy may not last. In Europe, this stranglehold on energy security is less and less tolerated. The Nord Stream 2 legal battle is a good illustration of this growing awareness.

In fact, the pipeline has been at a standstill since its construction, due to non-compliance with European competition rules. In addition, the new German government may reconsider its start-up despite the promised doubling of exports.

Alexei Miller

Breaking the monopoly in favor of Rosneft, also a state-owned company

On the Russian side, the government could also agree to relax Gazprom’s monopoly in favor of the oil company Rosneft. Officially, the parties involved say they want to comply with European competition rules. However, this liberalization needs to be measured.

Rosneft is state-controlled, headed by Igor Setchine, Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation. In this way, two state-controlled companies would retain control over exports.

What can Europe do in the short term?

The European Commission has formally taken note of Naftogaz’s request, but has not yet given its opinion. And for good reason: in the short term, Europe is not in a strong position to engage in head-on combat.

Gas stocks remain abnormally low for the season, and energy prices are raising fears of an economic crisis. In addition, tensions on energy markets offer few alternatives.

What to make of the Russian-Ukrainian armed conflict?

The conflict in Ukraine is also at the heart of the Gazprom issue. While Russia denies any political manipulation, the synchronicity with the situation in the Donbass is striking. In the past, Moscow has not hesitated to use gas to influence negotiations.

And for many of Europe’s chancelleries, the correlation is unmistakable. Thus, a gas war would not be conducive to resolving the conflict, which also has a significant impact on prices.

Multiplying new energy projects

Nevertheless, in the medium term, Europe is not outdone in ensuring its autonomy. Hydrogen projects are multiplying, France wants to renew its nuclear fleet, and the European Union has increased its commitment to low-carbon energies.

For many experts, the excitement surrounding gas is just one stage in the transition to renewable energies. If Russia and Gazprom benefit from this monopoly, European energy diversification could turn against Russia.

The EU member states agree to prioritise a loan mechanism backed by immobilised Russian assets to finance aid to Ukraine, reducing national budgetary impact while ensuring enhanced funding capacity.
The Canadian government commits $56 billion to a new wave of infrastructure projects aimed at expanding energy corridors, accelerating critical mineral extraction and reinforcing strategic capacity.
Berlin strengthens its cooperation with Abuja through funding aimed at supporting Nigeria’s energy diversification and consolidating its renewable infrastructure.
COP30 begins in Belém under uncertainty, as countries fail to agree on key discussion topics, highlighting deep divisions over climate finance and the global energy transition.
The United States secures a tungsten joint venture in Kazakhstan and mining protocols in Uzbekistan, with financing envisaged from the Export-Import Bank of the United States and shipment routed via the Trans-Caspian corridor.
The United States grants Hungary a one-year waiver on sanctions targeting Russian oil, in return for a commitment to purchase US liquefied natural gas worth $600mn.
Meeting in Canada, G7 energy ministers unveiled a series of projects aimed at securing supply chains for critical minerals, in response to China’s restrictions on rare earth exports.
Donald Trump announces an immediate reduction in tariffs on Chinese fentanyl-related imports from 20% to 10%, potentially impacting energy flows between Washington and Beijing.
Amman plans to launch tenders for 400 megawatts of solar, wind and storage projects, as part of a strengthened bilateral energy cooperation with Germany.
An emergency meeting led by the European Commission gathers key sectors affected by China's export restrictions on rare earths, ahead of a briefing at the European Parliament.
Manila plans to expand gas and renewable energy production to meet a 6.6% increase in electricity demand over the next two years.
Ottawa and London increased bilateral exchanges to structure strategic cooperation on nuclear energy and critical minerals supply chains, as part of Canada’s G7 presidency.
Donald Trump says he secured Narendra Modi’s commitment to end Russian oil imports, adding political pressure to India-Russia trade relations.
Under intense diplomatic pressure from Washington, member states of the International Maritime Organization agreed to postpone by one year the adoption of a carbon pricing mechanism for global maritime transport.
Washington confirms it has mandated the CIA to carry out secret actions against Nicolas Maduro’s government, escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela amid geostrategic and energy stakes.
Two European Parliament committees propose to advance the full halt of Russian hydrocarbon imports to 2026 and 2027, including oil, gas, and LNG, strengthening the European Union’s geopolitical position.
The COP30 conference hosted in the Amazon by Brazil faces low participation from global leaders, amid geopolitical tensions and major logistical challenges.
The United States has granted Trinidad and Tobago a special licence to resume negotiations with Venezuela on the Dragon gas field, partially lifting restrictions imposed on the Venezuelan energy sector.
Ambassadors of European Union member states have approved the transmission of a legislative proposal to phase out Russian fossil fuel imports by January 2028 to the Council of Ministers.
The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.