The depreciation of the won worsens South Korean refiners’ losses amidst political turmoil

The decline of the won against the dollar exposes South Korean refiners to significant losses on crude import costs, while the political crisis surrounding martial law undermines investor confidence.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The recent depreciation of the South Korean won against the dollar, reaching a multi-year low, is putting pressure on South Korean refiners as settlement costs for imported crude soar. This currency movement arises amid internal political unrest, exacerbating the fragility of the country’s financial markets.

Financial and logistical impacts

South Korea’s four main refiners – SK Innovation, GS Caltex, S-Oil, and Hyundai Oilbank – depend almost entirely on imports for their crude oil needs, making the dollar-won exchange rate a critical factor. According to industry sources, every 10-won increase in the exchange rate results in foreign exchange-related losses of $5 million to $10 million for these companies.

Currently, refiners are receiving shipments of medium-sour Middle Eastern crude that were negotiated months ago, at a time when exchange rates were more favorable. However, the sudden depreciation of the won has significantly inflated final bills. Teams specializing in oil derivatives and currency hedging are struggling to mitigate these unforeseen impacts.

The dollar-won exchange rate climbed to 1,436.26 won during the afternoon session on December 16, according to the Bank of Korea, compared to 1,403.96 won at the beginning of the month. This volatility increases pressure on refining margins, which are already strained by average import costs of $83.96 per barrel over the first ten months of the year, according to Korea National Oil Corp.

Political turmoil

The ongoing political crisis, marked by the declaration of martial law on December 3 and President Yoon Suk-yeol’s resistance to judicial investigation, has shaken investor confidence. Although Yoon’s impeachment was passed by the National Assembly on December 14, slow judicial processes and partial arrests of military and government officials prolong political instability.

Millions of South Korean citizens are demonstrating daily to demand the arrest of the president and his allies. While these protests remain largely peaceful, the perception of political risk undermines the stability of financial markets.

Outlook for the energy sector

Despite the tense political climate, the fundamentals of South Korea’s refining and oil trading industries remain robust. Refiners continue to meet the demands of their clients in Asia and Oceania while fulfilling supply contracts for petroleum products. However, refining margins remain under pressure due to currency volatility and political uncertainty.

Industry professionals hope for a swift resolution to the crisis and the establishment of a new governmental leadership structure. This transition is considered essential for restoring investor confidence and stabilizing South Korea’s financial markets, which are deeply interconnected with global supply chains.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences