USA: Closing nuclear power plants, a risk according to MIT

Closing all nuclear power plants in the U.S. would result in a significant increase in emissions from coal and other fuels. Economic impacts were also assessed, with researchers estimating that this would result in annual costs of between $50.4 billion and $220.2 billion.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

A recent analysis by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the University of California-Davis found that closing all nuclear power plants in the United States would result in a significant increase in emissions from coal and other generating fuels. This would lead to thousands of additional deaths. The researchers used an energy allocation model of the U.S. electricity sector to quantify the increase in carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide emissions if all of the nation’s nuclear generation were to be permanently shut down.

The health consequences of air pollution related to nuclear power plant closures

The study, published in the scientific journal Nature Energy, identifies regions with a high risk of increased emissions due to a global response to closures, even though not all nuclear power plants will realistically be closed at the same time. The researchers fed the model with available data on the evolution of emissions and energy costs for each plant for an entire year and ran the model in different scenarios. Notably a nuclear-free energy grid, a baseline grid similar to today’s that includes nuclear power, and a nuclear-free grid that also incorporates the additional renewable sources expected to be added by 2030.

The analysis concluded that increased air pollution would have serious health effects, resulting in 5,200 additional pollution-related deaths in a single year. If greater amounts of renewable energy are integrated into the grid, as projected by 2030, air pollution would be reduced, although not entirely, still resulting in 260 additional deaths per year. The researchers noted that black or African-American communities, a disproportionate number of which live near fossil fuel plants, were most exposed to the additional emissions.

Nuclear energy: a clean and reliable source of energy

The economic impacts of a U.S. nuclear phase-out were also assessed, with researchers estimating that it would result in annual costs of between $50.4 billion and $220.2 billion. The potential economic impacts due to climate and health impacts of a U.S. nuclear phase-out were also assessed, with the authors estimating that it could result in 80,000 to 160,000 additional deaths over 100 years due to increased carbon dioxide emissions as the grid compensates for the lack of nuclear power.

Nuclear power is a clean, reliable source of carbon-free energy that saves the atmosphere more than 470 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions that would otherwise be produced by fossil fuels. By keeping existing nuclear plants online and deploying the next generation of reactors, the United States can help ensure that its nation meets its decarbonization goals while protecting the health of its communities.

The Tennessee Valley Authority partners with ENTRA1 Energy to develop up to 6 gigawatts of modular nuclear capacity, in an unprecedented project supporting energy growth across seven U.S. states.
A report by the International Atomic Energy Agency puts Iran’s 60% enriched uranium at 440.9 kg before Israeli and U.S. strikes, while the agency’s access to enrichment sites has remained suspended since the operations.
US-based Westinghouse has signed six industrial agreements in the UK to supply critical components for its AP1000 and AP300 nuclear projects in Britain and abroad.
NANO Nuclear Energy receives direct funding from the US Air Force innovation branch to assess the integration of its KRONOS MMRâ„¢ microreactor at the Washington D.C. military base.
EDF extends the operation of Heysham 1 and Hartlepool by one year after favourable safety inspections, ensuring continuity of nuclear production and safeguarding more than 1,000 jobs.
Russian nuclear group Rosatom has confirmed advanced discussions with India and Turkey to launch new power plants, including advanced and floating reactor technologies.
The International Atomic Energy Agency has identified uranium particles of industrial origin in samples taken from a Syrian site suspected of hosting an undeclared nuclear reactor.
Norwegian authorities begin the first regulatory phase for two modular nuclear reactor projects, marking a strategic step in the national review of the potential role of nuclear energy in the country’s power mix.
With eleven reactors under construction and major projects such as Jaitapur, India is preparing a nuclear build-up that could place it among the world’s five leading nations in the sector.
France and Germany have validated a joint energy roadmap, including a commitment to the non-discrimination of nuclear energy in European financing.
Russia and Iran seek to strengthen their nuclear cooperation as the E3 activates the sanctions mechanism against Tehran, reigniting tensions over compliance with the 2015 Vienna agreement.
US-based Natura Resources has secured strategic funding and key permits for its MSR-1 nuclear reactor, backed by public funds and enriched fuel allocation from the Department of Energy.
The United States and South Korea have agreed to initiate discussions on reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, marking a potential strategic shift in the long-standing bilateral agreement.
The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission has granted a 40-year extension for the AP1000 reactor design certification, supporting its long-term construction domestically and deployment abroad.
Nano Nuclear Energy has signed a memorandum of understanding with Dioxitek, Argentina’s only uranium supplier for nuclear fuel, to assess the development of local conversion and enrichment capacities.
Stockholm plans to restart uranium extraction by lifting the 2018 ban, aiming to secure strategic supply chains and support domestic nuclear electricity production.
The French Atomic Energy Commission has signed a letter of intent with start-up Calogena to study the installation of a 30 MW thermal small nuclear reactor at its Cadarache site.
A Guidehouse Research report anticipates strong growth in the global nuclear modular reactor market, with revenues rising from $375.8 million in 2025 to $8.1 billion in 2034.
KHNP, Doosan, POSCO and Samsung C&T join US partners to develop 5 GW of modular reactors, expand uranium enrichment and build an 11 GW energy complex in Texas.
The US Department of Energy is creating an industrial consortium to accelerate domestic enriched uranium production and reduce reliance on foreign imports ahead of the Russian supply ban in 2027.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.