Turkey faces Russian control over its nuclear future at Akkuyu

Facing Russian dominance in the Akkuyu nuclear project, Turkey accelerates international negotiations, aiming to mitigate risks related to energy dependency and potential strategic conflicts of interest.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The Akkuyu nuclear project, led by the Russian giant Rosatom, raises significant economic, technical, and security concerns in Turkey. Valued at USD 25 billion, this critical project for Turkey’s energy policy is currently 99% controlled by Rosatom through its subsidiary Akkuyu Nükleer A.Åž. The Turkish Parliament recently expressed serious concerns…

The Akkuyu nuclear project, led by the Russian giant Rosatom, raises significant economic, technical, and security concerns in Turkey. Valued at USD 25 billion, this critical project for Turkey’s energy policy is currently 99% controlled by Rosatom through its subsidiary Akkuyu Nükleer A.Åž. The Turkish Parliament recently expressed serious concerns about the economic implications of the agreement signed with Russia, which guarantees a high price of 12.35 US cents per kilowatt-hour for 15 years, significantly higher than domestic and international rates. This situation, coupled with Russian shareholder dominance, fuels questions about potential conflicts of interest undermining Turkish national interests.

Debates on security and technological dependence

In addition to financial costs, Turkish MPs highlighted project delays, notably related to difficulties with Siemens, the German company originally responsible for supplying essential equipment. Facing these delays, Rosatom has turned to Chinese alternatives, raising further questions about Turkey’s technological independence. Limited local participation, estimated between only 25 to 30% of contracts, reinforces concerns over long-term technical dependence on foreign expertise, primarily Russian and Chinese. Since 2011, 319 Turkish engineers have been trained in Russia, placing Turkey in a long-term technological dependence on Russian methods and standards.

Environmental and security concerns were also raised by parliamentarians. Mehmet Tahtasız emphasized the lack of local infrastructure suited to the long-term management of radioactive waste generated by Akkuyu. Furthermore, Mahmut Tanal demanded guarantees concerning seismic assessments and emergency measures, noting that Akkuyu is situated in a highly earthquake-prone area. These factors heighten risks associated with foreign management of such sensitive infrastructure.

Partner diversification strategy

Facing Russian influence, Ankara has embarked on active energy diplomacy for its future nuclear plants, notably in Sinop on the Black Sea coast, and Thrace. According to Turkish Energy Minister Alparslan Bayraktar, advanced negotiations are currently ongoing with Canada through Candu Energy, as well as with China and South Korea. Turkey aims to reach 20 gigawatts (GW) of nuclear capacity by 2050, necessitating rapid partner diversification to prevent scenarios similar to Akkuyu.

Discussions with China are particularly advanced for the project in Thrace, notably with the State Power Investment Cooperation (SPIC). Bayraktar also met with representatives from CNOS and CATL to explore various nuclear investment models and technologies. This diversification appears crucial in a context dominated by Russian influence over the Akkuyu project.

Unexploited legal levers

Despite these new initiatives, Turkey has yet to invoke Article 5 of the bilateral agreement signed with Russia in 2010, which would allow it to reclaim up to 49% of Akkuyu’s shares for national security reasons. Until now, Ankara considers Akkuyu a national commercial entity subject to Turkish law but has not exercised its participation rights. This status quo effectively maintains Russian control over a facility destined to provide 10% of the country’s electricity.

For stakeholders in the energy sector, the current Akkuyu situation and future strategic decisions by the Turkish government will be crucial. Upcoming developments, especially Akkuyu’s planned operational start at the end of 2025, and progress in negotiations with new partners, will determine the real extent of foreign influence over Turkey’s nuclear sector.

The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.

We are making technical adjustments to our item access system.
Temporary display or access problems may occur.
Thank you for your understanding.

Consent Preferences