Trump Revives Tariff Threat on Oil: What Impact on the U.S. Industry?

Donald Trump's promise to impose 25% tariffs on oil imports from Canada and Mexico raises concerns among experts, fearing higher energy costs and escalating trade tensions in North America.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

Donald Trump’s recent declaration to impose 25% tariffs on all imports from Canada and Mexico starting on his first day in office in 2025 has cast uncertainty over the U.S. oil industry. Although these measures are framed as a negotiation tactic, experts are already debating the economic implications for the energy sector.

In July 2024, the U.S. imported a record 4.3 million barrels per day (b/d) of Canadian crude oil, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). These imports, representing nearly 50% of foreign crude consumed in the U.S., are essential for the operations of American refineries. If the new tariffs were enacted without exemptions, they could significantly raise costs for these facilities, potentially leading to higher gasoline prices for American consumers.

A Controversial Negotiation Tool

Donald Trump’s approach of announcing drastic measures as a starting point for trade negotiations is not new. In 2026, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), will undergo a mandatory review. Trump’s tariff threats could serve as leverage to secure concessions within this framework.

However, critics are already highlighting the risks associated with this strategy. “It’s a pressure tactic that, if implemented, could seriously disrupt the energy market,” explained William Reinsch, senior advisor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. According to him, exemptions for energy products, particularly crude oil and refined products, would be necessary to limit the economic fallout.

Industry Advocates for Free Trade

U.S. oil and gas industry stakeholders have voiced their opposition to protectionist measures that could increase supply costs and reduce the sector’s competitiveness. Scott Lauermann, spokesperson for the American Petroleum Institute (API), emphasized the importance of the energy partnership with Canada and Mexico, stating, “Maintaining free trade is crucial for North American energy security and U.S. consumers.”

American refineries, particularly in the PADD 2 region (Midwest), rely heavily on Canadian crude, a source difficult to replace due to its specific composition. According to Bob McNally, president of the Rapidan Energy Group, a 25% tariff would lead to higher pump prices, especially in Midwestern states, exacerbating economic pressures on households.

A Burdensome Exemption Process

Although exemptions are deemed likely, their implementation remains a contentious issue. Companies would need to navigate a complex and costly process to obtain waivers, which might discourage some from pursuing them. “The exemption process is often perceived as an additional burden with a high rejection rate,” said Josh Zive, legal expert at Bracewell LLP.

For now, observers hope that consultations between the energy sector and the Trump administration will prevent these tariffs. Nevertheless, the only certainty lies in the uncertainty surrounding future U.S. trade policies, as companies prepare for a variety of scenarios.

Coal India issues tenders to develop 5 GW of renewable capacity, split between solar and wind, as part of its long-term energy strategy.
US utilities anticipate a rapid increase in high-intensity loads, targeting 147 GW of new capacity by 2035, with a strategic shift toward deregulated markets.
France opens a national consultation on RTE’s plan to invest €100 billion by 2040 to modernise the high-voltage electricity transmission grid.
Governor Gavin Newsom orders state agencies to fast-track clean energy projects to capture Inflation Reduction Act credits before deadlines expire.
Germany’s energy transition could cost up to €5.4tn ($6.3tn) by 2049, according to the main industry organisation, raising concerns over national competitiveness.
Russian group T Plus plans to stabilise its electricity output at 57.6 TWh in 2025, despite a decline recorded in the first half of the year, according to Chief Executive Officer Pavel Snikkars.
In France, the Commission de régulation de l’énergie issues a clarification on ten statements shared over the summer, correcting several figures regarding tariffs, production and investments in the electricity sector.
A group of 85 researchers challenges the scientific validity of the climate report released by the US Department of Energy, citing partial methods and the absence of independent peer review.
Five energy infrastructure projects have been added to the list of cross-border renewable projects, making them eligible for financial support under the CEF Energy programme.
The Tanzanian government launches a national consultation to accelerate the rollout of compressed natural gas, mobilising public and private financing to secure energy supply and lower fuel costs.
The Kuwaiti government has invited three international consortia to submit bids for the first phase of the Al Khairan project, combining power generation and desalination.
Nigeria’s state-owned oil company abandons plans to sell the Port Harcourt refinery and confirms a maintenance programme despite high operating costs.
The publication of the Multiannual Energy Programme decree, awaited for two years, is compromised by internal political tensions, jeopardising strategic investments in nuclear and renewables.
The US Energy Information Administration reschedules or cancels several publications, affecting the availability of critical data for oil, gas and renewables markets.
Brazilian authorities have launched a large-scale operation targeting a money laundering system linked to the fuel sector, involving investment funds, fintechs, and more than 1,000 service stations across the country.
A national study by the Davies Group reveals widespread American support for the simultaneous development of both renewable and fossil energy sources, with strong approval for natural gas and solar energy.
The South Korean government compels ten petrochemical groups to cut up to 3.7 million tons of naphtha cracking per year, tying financial and tax support to swift and documented restructuring measures.
The U.S. Department of Energy has extended until November the emergency measures aimed at ensuring the stability of Puerto Rico’s power grid against overload risks and recurring outages.
Under threat of increased U.S. tariffs, New Delhi is accelerating its energy independence strategy to reduce reliance on imports, particularly Russian oil.
With a new $800 million investment agreement, Tsingshan expands the Manhize steel plant and generates an energy demand of more than 500 MW, forcing Zimbabwe to accelerate its electricity strategy.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.