Trump Revives Tariff Threat on Oil: What Impact on the U.S. Industry?

Donald Trump's promise to impose 25% tariffs on oil imports from Canada and Mexico raises concerns among experts, fearing higher energy costs and escalating trade tensions in North America.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

Donald Trump’s recent declaration to impose 25% tariffs on all imports from Canada and Mexico starting on his first day in office in 2025 has cast uncertainty over the U.S. oil industry. Although these measures are framed as a negotiation tactic, experts are already debating the economic implications for the energy sector.

In July 2024, the U.S. imported a record 4.3 million barrels per day (b/d) of Canadian crude oil, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). These imports, representing nearly 50% of foreign crude consumed in the U.S., are essential for the operations of American refineries. If the new tariffs were enacted without exemptions, they could significantly raise costs for these facilities, potentially leading to higher gasoline prices for American consumers.

A Controversial Negotiation Tool

Donald Trump’s approach of announcing drastic measures as a starting point for trade negotiations is not new. In 2026, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), will undergo a mandatory review. Trump’s tariff threats could serve as leverage to secure concessions within this framework.

However, critics are already highlighting the risks associated with this strategy. “It’s a pressure tactic that, if implemented, could seriously disrupt the energy market,” explained William Reinsch, senior advisor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. According to him, exemptions for energy products, particularly crude oil and refined products, would be necessary to limit the economic fallout.

Industry Advocates for Free Trade

U.S. oil and gas industry stakeholders have voiced their opposition to protectionist measures that could increase supply costs and reduce the sector’s competitiveness. Scott Lauermann, spokesperson for the American Petroleum Institute (API), emphasized the importance of the energy partnership with Canada and Mexico, stating, “Maintaining free trade is crucial for North American energy security and U.S. consumers.”

American refineries, particularly in the PADD 2 region (Midwest), rely heavily on Canadian crude, a source difficult to replace due to its specific composition. According to Bob McNally, president of the Rapidan Energy Group, a 25% tariff would lead to higher pump prices, especially in Midwestern states, exacerbating economic pressures on households.

A Burdensome Exemption Process

Although exemptions are deemed likely, their implementation remains a contentious issue. Companies would need to navigate a complex and costly process to obtain waivers, which might discourage some from pursuing them. “The exemption process is often perceived as an additional burden with a high rejection rate,” said Josh Zive, legal expert at Bracewell LLP.

For now, observers hope that consultations between the energy sector and the Trump administration will prevent these tariffs. Nevertheless, the only certainty lies in the uncertainty surrounding future U.S. trade policies, as companies prepare for a variety of scenarios.

Facing a structural electricity surplus, the government commits to releasing a new Multiannual Energy Programme by Christmas, as aligning supply, demand and investments becomes a key industrial and budgetary issue.
A key scientific report by the United Nations Environment Programme failed to gain state approval due to deep divisions over fossil fuels and other sensitive issues.
RTE warns of France’s delay in electrifying energy uses, a key step to limiting fossil fuel imports and supporting its reindustrialisation strategy.
India’s central authority has cancelled 6.3 GW of grid connections for renewable projects since 2022, marking a tightening of regulations and a shift in responsibility back to developers.
The Brazilian government has been instructed to define within two months a plan for the gradual reduction of fossil fuels, supported by a national energy transition fund financed by oil revenues.
The German government may miss the January 2026 deadline to transpose the RED III directive, creating uncertainty over biofuel mandates and disrupting markets.
Italy allocated 82% of the proposed solar and wind capacities in the Fer-X auction, totalling 8.6GW, with competitive purchase prices and a strong concentration of projects in the southern part of the country.
Amid rising public spending, the French government has tasked two experts with reassessing the support scheme for renewable electricity and storage, with proposals expected within three months.
National operator PSE partners with armed forces to protect transformer stations as critical infrastructure faces sabotage linked to foreign interference.
The Norwegian government establishes a commission to anticipate the decline of hydrocarbons and assess economic options for the country in the coming decades.
Kazakhstan plans to allocate 3 GW of wind and solar projects by the end of 2026 through public tenders, with a first 1 GW tranche in 2025, amid efforts to modernise its power system.
Hurricanes Beryl, Helene and Milton accounted for 80% of electricity outages recorded in 2024, marking a ten-year high according to federal data.
The French Energy Regulatory Commission introduces a temporary prudential control on gas and electricity suppliers through a “guichet à blanc” opening in December, pending the transposition of European rules.
The Carney–Smith agreement launches a new pipeline to Asia, removes oil and gas emission caps, and initiates reform of the Pacific north coast tanker ban.
The gradual exit from CfD contracts is turning stable assets into infrastructures exposed to higher volatility, challenging expected returns and traditional financing models for the renewable sector.
The Canadian government introduces major legislative changes to the Energy Efficiency Act to support its national strategy and adapt to the realities of digital commerce.
Quebec becomes the only Canadian province where a carbon price still applies directly to fuels, as Ottawa eliminated the public-facing carbon tax in April 2025.
New Delhi launches a 72.8 bn INR incentive plan to build a 6,000-tonne domestic capacity for permanent magnets, amid rising Chinese export restrictions on critical components.
The rise of CfDs, PPAs and capacity mechanisms signals a structural shift: markets alone no longer cover 10–30-year financing needs, while spot prices have surged 400% in Europe since 2019.
Germany plans to finalise the €5.8bn ($6.34bn) purchase of a 25.1% stake in TenneT Germany to strengthen its control over critical national power grid infrastructure.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.