Trump hits Brazil with 50% tariffs but spares oil and iron

Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The Trump administration signed an executive order on Wednesday imposing 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports, citing national security threats related to the judicial treatment of former president Jair Bolsonaro. The measure comes despite a US trade surplus of $7.4bn with Brazil in 2024, contradicting the administration’s usual economic justifications. The tariffs will take effect in seven days but strategically exclude several categories of products essential to the US economy.

Complex architecture of sectoral exemptions
The exemptions reveal US industrial priorities and supply constraints. Crude oil, accounting for $44.8bn in Brazilian exports to the US in 2024, is completely exempt from the tariffs. This decision preserves access to the 230,000 barrels per day exported by Brazil to the US West Coast according to S&P Global Commodities at Sea data. Refined petroleum products are also exempt, maintaining energy supply flows.

Iron ore and all forms of iron used as steelmaking inputs are exempted, protecting $5.72bn in trade. Brazil remains the second largest steel exporter and the leading iron exporter to the US. Other exemptions include civil aircraft, preserving Embraer, of which 45% of commercial aircraft production is destined for the US market; wood pulp, protecting Suzano; metallurgical alumina; precious metals; and fertilisers.

Political justification without economic precedent
The presidential decree invokes the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify the tariffs. This use of emergency economic powers for the internal political considerations of a third country sets a contentious legal precedent. The administration asserts that Bolsonaro’s prosecution amounts to political persecution threatening US interests. This argument is already being challenged in federal courts regarding presidential authority over tariffs.

Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva responded by promising reciprocity, highlighting the US trade surplus with Brazil. Data from Brazil’s Ministry of Foreign Trade confirm the US enjoys a positive trade balance, invalidating the traditional argument of trade deficits. Brazilian authorities are preparing retaliation measures, potentially targeting US agricultural exports.

Differentiated impact on Brazilian companies
Sector analysis reveals asymmetric impacts across companies. Embraer saw its shares jump 11% in São Paulo following news of the exemptions. Suzano gained 1% despite initial concerns about pulp exports. Orange juice producers, also exempted, maintain access to the US market where Brazil accounts for more than 70% of imports. These exemptions represent approximately 40 to 50% of the total value of Brazilian exports to the US.

Non-exempted sectors include processed agricultural products, some chemicals, and manufactured goods. Former Brazilian Secretary of Trade Welber Barral estimates that out of about 3,000 categories of exported products, only a fraction benefits from exemptions. Small and medium-sized enterprises without effective lobbying in Washington face the full impact of the tariffs.

Strategic repositioning and trade alternatives
Brazil is accelerating trade negotiations with the European Union and China in response to US tariffs. Data show that China already absorbs 46% of Brazilian crude oil exports and 71% of iron ore exports. This dependence could intensify as Brasília seeks to offset losses in the US market. Brazilian companies are exploring joint ventures in Argentina and Mexico to maintain North American market access via USMCA.

The Brazilian financial sector anticipates increased volatility in the real and adjustments in supply chains. Economic forecasts suggest a limited impact on Brazil’s GDP thanks to the exemptions, estimated between 0.3 and 0.4 percentage points according to Goldman Sachs. The Brazilian strategy combines legal challenges at the WTO, trade diversification, and calibrated retaliation measures aimed at maximising political impact in the US while minimising harm to its own economy.

Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
Consent Preferences