Trump hits Brazil with 50% tariffs but spares oil and iron

Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.

Share:

The Trump administration signed an executive order on Wednesday imposing 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports, citing national security threats related to the judicial treatment of former president Jair Bolsonaro. The measure comes despite a US trade surplus of $7.4bn with Brazil in 2024, contradicting the administration’s usual economic justifications. The tariffs will take effect in seven days but strategically exclude several categories of products essential to the US economy.

Complex architecture of sectoral exemptions
The exemptions reveal US industrial priorities and supply constraints. Crude oil, accounting for $44.8bn in Brazilian exports to the US in 2024, is completely exempt from the tariffs. This decision preserves access to the 230,000 barrels per day exported by Brazil to the US West Coast according to S&P Global Commodities at Sea data. Refined petroleum products are also exempt, maintaining energy supply flows.

Iron ore and all forms of iron used as steelmaking inputs are exempted, protecting $5.72bn in trade. Brazil remains the second largest steel exporter and the leading iron exporter to the US. Other exemptions include civil aircraft, preserving Embraer, of which 45% of commercial aircraft production is destined for the US market; wood pulp, protecting Suzano; metallurgical alumina; precious metals; and fertilisers.

Political justification without economic precedent
The presidential decree invokes the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify the tariffs. This use of emergency economic powers for the internal political considerations of a third country sets a contentious legal precedent. The administration asserts that Bolsonaro’s prosecution amounts to political persecution threatening US interests. This argument is already being challenged in federal courts regarding presidential authority over tariffs.

Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva responded by promising reciprocity, highlighting the US trade surplus with Brazil. Data from Brazil’s Ministry of Foreign Trade confirm the US enjoys a positive trade balance, invalidating the traditional argument of trade deficits. Brazilian authorities are preparing retaliation measures, potentially targeting US agricultural exports.

Differentiated impact on Brazilian companies
Sector analysis reveals asymmetric impacts across companies. Embraer saw its shares jump 11% in São Paulo following news of the exemptions. Suzano gained 1% despite initial concerns about pulp exports. Orange juice producers, also exempted, maintain access to the US market where Brazil accounts for more than 70% of imports. These exemptions represent approximately 40 to 50% of the total value of Brazilian exports to the US.

Non-exempted sectors include processed agricultural products, some chemicals, and manufactured goods. Former Brazilian Secretary of Trade Welber Barral estimates that out of about 3,000 categories of exported products, only a fraction benefits from exemptions. Small and medium-sized enterprises without effective lobbying in Washington face the full impact of the tariffs.

Strategic repositioning and trade alternatives
Brazil is accelerating trade negotiations with the European Union and China in response to US tariffs. Data show that China already absorbs 46% of Brazilian crude oil exports and 71% of iron ore exports. This dependence could intensify as Brasília seeks to offset losses in the US market. Brazilian companies are exploring joint ventures in Argentina and Mexico to maintain North American market access via USMCA.

The Brazilian financial sector anticipates increased volatility in the real and adjustments in supply chains. Economic forecasts suggest a limited impact on Brazil’s GDP thanks to the exemptions, estimated between 0.3 and 0.4 percentage points according to Goldman Sachs. The Brazilian strategy combines legal challenges at the WTO, trade diversification, and calibrated retaliation measures aimed at maximising political impact in the US while minimising harm to its own economy.

Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lends €400 million to JSC Energocom to diversify Moldova's gas and electricity supply, historically dependent on Russian imports via Ukraine.
BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.
The European Commission is launching an alliance with member states and industrial players to secure the supply of critical chemicals, amid growing competition from the United States and China.
Trade between Russia and Saudi Arabia grew by over 60% in 2024 to surpass USD 3.8 billion, according to Russian Minister of Industry and Trade Anton Alikhanov, who outlined new avenues for industrial cooperation.
Meeting in Rio, BRICS nations urge global energy market stability, openly condemning Western sanctions and tariff mechanisms in a tense economic and geopolitical context.
Despite strong ties, Iran's dependence on oil revenues limits its ability to secure substantial strategic support from Russia and China amid current international and regional crises, according to several experts.
Egypt’s Electricity Minister engages in new talks with Envision Group, Windey, LONGi, China Energy, PowerChina, and ToNGWEI to boost local industry and attract investments in renewable energy.