The UAE-Israel oil deal: a geopolitical revolution?

The normalization of ties between the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Israel raises crucial questions about the oil agreement and the Eilat-Ashkelon pipeline. This potential agreement, which would make it possible to bypass the Suez Canal, could have major implications for oil supply routes in the Middle East, redrawing the region's strategic balance.

Share:

accord pétrolier

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Is the UAE-Israel oil deal a strategic turning point in the Middle East? At any rate, this is the question that arises after the historic normalization of ties between the two countries. The Israeli government has just announced the opening of discussions with Dubai concerning the use of a joint oil pipeline (the Europe Asia Pipeline). It links the Red Sea port of Eilat with Ashkelon in the Mediterranean, bypassing the Suez Canal.

With a capacity of 600,000 barrels/day, this pipeline will mainly be used to transport crude oil from the Middle East to Europe. It will be co-managed by the Israeli state-owned company EAPC and the Emirati company MED-RED Land Bridge. Operating in both directions, the pipeline will also be able to transport crude oil from Central Asia and Europe to the Indian Ocean. If the project goes ahead, it could become a major oil route in the years to come.

The strategic importance of the UAE-Israel oil deal

The announcement of talks on the Eilat-Ashkelon pipeline sent shockwaves through the Middle East. The question of oil supply routes is central in a region still highly dependent on hydrocarbon exports. Several factors explain the strategic importance of this new road.

UAE-Israel oil agreement

The vulnerability of the Suez Canal

The first factor is the vulnerability of the Suez Canal route and its pipeline, SUMED. Due to its lack of depth, the canal is effectively unable to accommodate VLCC supertankers. They can load around 2 million barrels, twice the maximum allowed on this route. As a result, crude carriers have to use two vessels instead of a single VLCC, generating additional costs.

They can also transport their crude via the SUMMED pipeline built parallel to the Suez Canal. The problem, however, lies in the pipeline’s limited capacity, which can only handle 2.34 million barrels/day. This represents a mere 40% of oil flows through the canal. With the increase in traffic, we can therefore expect this road to become rapidly congested over the next few years.

The Suez Canal is the world’s third-largest oil transit route. Nearly 6 million barrels are transported by this route every day. This makes the UAE-Israel pipeline an interesting alternative, particularly for the use of VLCCs to relieve traffic congestion.

A conflict of influence with Turkey

The UAE-Israel oil deal should also be seen as a strategy for the influence of both countries on the regional scene. For the Israeli government, the agreement opens up the possibility of turning the country into a transit zone for Europe. Tel Aviv’s ambition is to become an oil and gas hub in order to increase its influence in the region. This ambition is also shared by Turkey, which is the big loser in the rapprochement between Dubai and Tel Aviv.

For the Emiratis, the oil agreement serves to counter Turkish influence on transit to Europe. Dubai thus hopes to compete with the Kirkuk-Ceyhan route, which transports 500,000 barrels/day of Iraqi crude through Turkey. The UAE also plans to deliver gas to Europe via an extension of the EastMed pipeline. This could make it possible to capitalize on Dubai’s recent huge gas discoveries in its Jebel Ali field.

At this point, however, the gas project has barely gone beyond the discussion stage. Nevertheless, it could be an important element in the future relationship between the Israeli and Emirati governments.

The uncertainties of the UAE-Israel oil deal

In some respects, the UAE-Israel oil deal is very ambitious, and not limited to the oil sector alone. Yet there are still grey areas that cast doubt on the agreement’s true strategic significance.

The project’s lack of transparency

One of the first questions raised by the project concerns its relative lack of transparency. Indeed, the Israeli government has always refused to publish information on the physical and financial state of the pipeline. This is due to the special nature of the Eilat-Ashkelon pipeline, which was originally conceived as a joint project with Iran. After the Islamic revolution of 1979, it was unilaterally nationalized by Israel, creating a legal dispute between the two countries.

Since then, absolutely nothing has been known about the companies using the pipeline. This lack of transparency is particularly problematic for investors, especially in the event of environmental damage. In 2014, this pipeline was responsible for the worst ecological disaster in Israel’s history. This lack of transparency could considerably reduce investor interest in the project.

Regional geopolitical uncertainties

Another question concerns the geopolitical effects of the UAE-Israel oil deal. Indeed, by bypassing the Suez Canal, the draft agreement provoked the ire of Egypt. For Cairo, this is a crucial issue for its public finances and its status in the region. Under these conditions, it is not impossible that the UAE and Israel will limit their ambitions in order to satisfy the Egyptians.

Similarly, this agreement does nothing to resolve transit problems in the Straits of Hormuz and Bab-el-Mandeb. Rivalries with Iran and instability in Yemen will therefore remain major obstacles to Emirati exports to Europe. The solution would therefore be to use the East-West pipeline that crosses Saudi Arabia to the Red Sea. However, this will depend on the pipeline’s capacity and Riyadh’s recognition of the State of Israel.

So it’s still too early to say whether the UAE-Israel oil deal represents a genuine geopolitical revolution. For this to happen, the pipeline will undoubtedly have to be extended to the Gulf countries. In practice, the scope of the project will depend to a large extent on the Saudi state’s attitude towards Israel.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences