Interconnecting power grids in Southeast Asia: a geopolitical challenge?

The interconnection of power grids in Southeast Asia has become a geopolitical issue, with China at the technological forefront. The United States is looking for alternatives, focusing on decentralized microgrids.

Share:

Is the interconnection of Asian power grids a new battleground in the Sino-American rivalry? For a long time, this question seemed unfounded, as the interconnection of power grids was essentially based on commercial considerations. Today, the situation has changed with the progressive electrification of Asian companies and Sino-American technological rivalry.

On the one hand, the electrification of societies has facilitated the development of large interconnected regional power grids. On the other hand, this interconnection of networks relies on the control of key technologies, which are the subject of a veritable geopolitical battle. This is why regional power grids are emerging as new arenas for power struggles. Located at the heart of global growth, Southeast Asia is a decisive territory in this context of rivalry.

Developing power grid interconnections in Southeast Asia

Over the past few years, Southeast Asia has placed great emphasis on the interconnection of power grids to enhance its energy security. This is particularly true of the Mekong countries, which form a common network known as the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS). It links China with Cambodia and Myanmar, and crosses Laos, Vietnam and Thailand. ASEAN has also unveiled an ambitious plan to interconnect and modernize its power grids, entitled theASEAN Power Grid.

 

South Asian power interconnection
Heads of delegation pose for a souvenir photo at the opening session of the 33rd ASEAN Summit (Source: Thông Nhât/AVI).

This desire to interconnect power grids is due to the significant gains made in terms of integrating renewable energies. Because they are difficult to control, they create imbalances on electricity markets, especially at peak times. An interconnected network can therefore limit this instability by facilitating the exchange of electricity between states. According to the World Bank, Southeast Asia could save almost 5% in electricity production costs.

Grid interconnection can also significantly reduce the region’s dependence on imported fossil fuels. Thailand and Vietnam take advantage of the GMS to import hydroelectricity from Laos and Cambodia. For these countries, this is a major challenge if they are to achieve the climate objectives set out in the Paris Agreement. That’s why South-East Asia is set to see strong growth in its power grids in the years ahead.

China’s role in the interconnection of Asian power grids

To facilitate regional exchanges, Asian networks will have to undergo a profound technological modernization. This will involve the installation of interconnectors and long-distance lines capable of handling a large flow of electricity. In this field, Chinese players dominate the market thanks to their technological lead. China’s State Grid and Southern Power Grid are the only companies able to install ultra-high-voltage lines.

This UHV technology is particularly important for facilitating the interconnection of power grids. In fact, by reducing losses over long distances, it lowers electricity transmission costs. Mastery of UHVs therefore gives Chinese players a major competitive advantage in Southeast Asia. Pakistan, Laos and Cambodia have already entrusted the modernization of their power grids to Chinese companies.

This push by Chinese players is encouraged by Beijing as part of its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The government is promoting an ambitious plan for continental interconnection, the Global Energy Interconnection Initiative (GEII), by 2049. Economically, the plan is designed to export China’s excess electricity capacity. Politically, GEII aims to strengthen Chinese influence by creating a de facto interdependence between Beijing and its neighbors.

The geopolitical dimension of Asian power grid interconnection

To counter China’s influence, the United States is promoting a strategy known as Free and Open Indo-Pacific. This strategy aims to invest in energy infrastructure and promote free-competition standards in Southeast Asia. In terms of power grids, this translates into clear support for alternative interconnection projects to Chinese ones. Washington thus supports SAARC, a project promoted by New Delhi to interconnect the Indian subcontinent.

South Asian power interconnection
Meeting between the American and Indian Ministers of Defense and Foreign Affairs in October 2020 (source: AFP).

 

Similarly, the United States has signed the US-Mekong Partnership to counter the GMS, which is largely dominated by China. Nevertheless, the Americans are finding it very difficult to offer a competitive network interconnection solution. This is because the United States has not mastered the technologies associated with interconnected, centralized networks. In the United States, for example, there is currently no interconnection between the country’s three main power grids.

Paradoxically, this delay has enabled the American private sector to invest massively inmicrogrid technologies. This is a crucial point, because far from competing with China on interconnected networks, the United States dominates decentralized networks. However, a microgrid can encourage the integration of renewables by improving demand flexibility. As a result, decentralized networks have the potential to drastically reduce the need for power grid interconnections.

In Southeast Asia, microgrids are the subject of growing interest. On the one hand, the geographical conditions of the region, made up of mountains and islands, favor micro-grids in terms of cost. On the other hand, the numerous typhoons make it necessary to develop decentralized networks as a factor in balancing electricity markets.

The United States and China have thus made power grids a new battleground in their strategic rivalry. Today, in Southeast Asia, we are witnessing a real struggle for influence between the two powers in this field. Without doubt, this competition can open our eyes to the geopolitical importance of power grid interconnection, which has unfortunately long been underestimated.

Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lends €400 million to JSC Energocom to diversify Moldova's gas and electricity supply, historically dependent on Russian imports via Ukraine.
BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.
The European Commission is launching an alliance with member states and industrial players to secure the supply of critical chemicals, amid growing competition from the United States and China.
Trade between Russia and Saudi Arabia grew by over 60% in 2024 to surpass USD 3.8 billion, according to Russian Minister of Industry and Trade Anton Alikhanov, who outlined new avenues for industrial cooperation.
Meeting in Rio, BRICS nations urge global energy market stability, openly condemning Western sanctions and tariff mechanisms in a tense economic and geopolitical context.
Despite strong ties, Iran's dependence on oil revenues limits its ability to secure substantial strategic support from Russia and China amid current international and regional crises, according to several experts.
Egypt’s Electricity Minister engages in new talks with Envision Group, Windey, LONGi, China Energy, PowerChina, and ToNGWEI to boost local industry and attract investments in renewable energy.
The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz places Gulf producers under intense pressure, highlighting their diplomatic and logistical limitations as a blockage threatens 20 million daily barrels of hydrocarbons destined for global markets.
Budapest and Bratislava jointly reject the European Commission's proposal to ban Russian energy supplies, highlighting significant economic risks and a direct threat to their energy security, days ahead of a key meeting.
Libya officially contests Greece's allocation of offshore oil permits, exacerbating regional tensions over disputed maritime areas south of Crete, rich in hydrocarbons and contested by several Mediterranean states.
Hungary, supported by Slovakia, strongly expresses opposition to the European Commission's plan to phase out imports of Russian energy resources, citing major economic and energy impacts for Central Europe.
Israeli military strikes on Iran's Natanz nuclear site destroyed critical electrical infrastructure but did not reach strategic underground facilities, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The French president travels to Nuuk on 15 June to support Greenlandic sovereignty, review energy projects and respond to recent US pressure, according to the Élysée.
Kazakhstan has selected Rosatom and China National Nuclear Corporation to build two nuclear power plants totaling 2.4 GW, a decision following a favorable referendum and coinciding with Xi Jinping’s upcoming strategic visit.
Israeli strikes against Iranian nuclear sites disrupt US-Iranian talks on the nuclear deal. Tehran now considers canceling the upcoming negotiation round in Oman, heightening regional economic concerns.
Facing alarming breaches of uranium enrichment thresholds by Iran and explicit existential threats, Israel launches targeted military strikes against Iranian nuclear infrastructure, escalating regional tensions dramatically.
The Kremlin has confirmed that Vladimir Putin aims to help resolve the nuclear dispute between the United States and Iran, leveraging strengthened strategic ties with Tehran.
President Lee Jae-myung adopts an energy diplomacy rooted in national interest, amid a complex international landscape of rivalries that could create challenging situations for the country and its energy businesses.
Paris and Warsaw held a bilateral workshop in Warsaw to strengthen coordination on electricity infrastructure investments and supply security under the Nancy Treaty.