Indonesia Faces Financial Challenges in JETP: Uncertainties and Pressures

Indonesia must manage ambitious climate commitments while maintaining energy stability. The Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP), aimed at mobilizing $20 billion, faces financial obstacles and uncertainties regarding international funding.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

Launched in 2022, the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) for Indonesia aims to finance the country’s energy transition with $20 billion in public and private funds. This program relies on international financing, but several obstacles are slowing down its implementation.

International Funding Under Pressure

One of the main challenges of the JETP concerns the origin and stability of funds allocated to Indonesia. The country has repeatedly expressed, particularly through the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, the necessity of receiving low-interest loans and concessional financing. These elements are crucial to prevent excessive financial strain on the state-owned electricity company PLN (Perusahaan Listrik Negara), which manages most of the country’s energy infrastructure.

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has introduced an “Energy Transition Mechanism” (ETM) aimed at buying out and shutting down certain coal-fired power plants earlier than planned. However, the feasibility of this mechanism depends on developed countries’ ability to uphold their financial commitments.

Uncertainties Over U.S. Funding

The involvement of the United States, a key player in the JETP, has faced challenges after the country withdrew from the Paris Agreement under the Trump administration. Although the Biden administration has rejoined the agreement, Indonesia remains cautious about the continuity of U.S. financial support. This caution stems from the history of U.S. policy decisions and the political uncertainty surrounding environmental commitments in the country.

According to Indonesian officials, the lack of guarantees on American funding hinders long-term planning for energy transition. Additionally, disbursement complexities, often tied to administrative and technical requirements, slow down access to capital.

The Challenge of Closing Coal-Fired Power Plants

Indonesia remains highly dependent on coal to maintain the stability of its power grid. The early closure of power plants, without solid financial support, could lead to increased electricity prices or higher debt for PLN.

Analyses from local organizations and international NGOs highlight that the country must balance energy transition with supply security. Shutting down coal-fired power plants too quickly could pose economic and social risks, particularly for regions reliant on the coal industry.

A Redefinition of Priorities?

Given financial uncertainties, Indonesia may reconsider its energy transition priorities. Aligning climate goals with economic realities remains a major challenge, especially since the stability of international funding remains uncertain.

While the JETP symbolizes an ambitious international cooperation effort, achieving its objectives will depend on the actual financial commitments of partner countries. For Indonesia, the challenge is twofold: ensuring a gradual energy transition while avoiding excessive fiscal pressure on its economy.

Opportunities are emerging for African countries to move from extraction to industrial manufacturing in energy technology value chains, as the 2025 G20 discussions highlight these issues.
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global renewable power capacity could more than double by 2030, driven by the rise of solar photovoltaics despite supply chain pressures and evolving policy frameworks.
Algeria plans to allocate $60 billion to energy projects by 2029, primarily targeting upstream oil and gas, while developing petrochemicals, renewables and unconventional resources.
China set a record for clean technology exports in August, driven by surging sales of electric vehicles and batteries, with more than half of the growth coming from non-OECD markets.
A night-time attack on Belgorod’s power grid left thousands without electricity, according to Russian local authorities, despite partial service restoration the following morning.
The French Academy of Sciences calls for a global ban on solar radiation modification, citing major risks to climate stability and the world economy.
The halt of US federal services disrupts the entire decision-making chain for energy and mining projects, with growing risks of administrative delays and missing critical data.
Facing a potential federal government shutdown, multiple US energy agencies are preparing to suspend services and furlough thousands of employees.
A report reveals the economic impact of renewable energy losses in Chile, indicating that a 1% drop in curtailments could generate $15mn in annual savings.
Faced with growing threats to its infrastructure, Denmark raises its energy alert level in response to a series of unidentified drone flyovers and ongoing geopolitical tensions.
The Prime Minister dismissed rumours of a moratorium on renewables, as the upcoming energy roadmap triggers tensions within the sector.
Kuwait plans to develop 14.05 GW of new power capacity by 2031 to meet growing demand and reduce scheduled outages, driven by extreme temperatures and maintenance delays.
The partnership with the World Bank-funded Pro Energia+ programme aims to expand electricity access in Mozambique by targeting rural communities through a results-based financing mechanism.
The European Commission strengthens ACER’s funding through a new fee structure applied to reporting entities, aimed at supporting increased surveillance of wholesale energy market transactions.
France’s Court of Auditors is urging clarity on EDF’s financing structure, as the public utility confronts a €460bn investment programme through 2040 to support its new nuclear reactor rollout.
The U.S. Department of Energy will return more than $13bn in unspent funds originally allocated to climate initiatives, in line with the Trump administration’s new budget policy.
Under pressure from Washington, the International Energy Agency reintroduces a pro-fossil scenario in its report, marking a shift in its direction amid rising tensions with the Trump administration.
Southeast Asia, facing rapid electricity consumption growth, could tap up to 20 terawatts of solar and wind potential to strengthen energy security.
The President of the Energy Regulatory Commission was elected to the presidency of the Board of Regulators of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators for a two-and-a-half-year term.
The Australian government has announced a new climate target backed by a funding plan, while maintaining its position as a major coal exporter, raising questions about its long-term energy strategy.