India navigates between US sanctions and Russian oil dependence

Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

Indian refiners are adopting a cautious approach regarding their import agreements with Russia, simultaneously intensifying efforts to further diversify their crude oil supply basket. This strategy comes as they await clearer signals regarding secondary sanctions threatened by US President Donald Trump, who has set an August 8 ultimatum for the Kremlin to agree to end the war in Ukraine.

New Delhi has given its refiners free rein to plan oil purchases with commercial viability in mind. Refiners now favor a delicate balance by increasing purchases from the United States and other non-OPEC suppliers. India has become the largest importer of Russian crude oil, with flows reaching 1.80 million barrels per day in 2024, surpassing China which imported 1.24 million barrels per day and Turkey with 0.3 million barrels per day.

Complex payment mechanisms reveal geopolitical tensions

Payment challenges constitute a crucial aspect not publicly discussed. India makes about 10% of its payments for Russian oil in Chinese yuan, with the remainder settled in Indian rupees and UAE dirhams. This complex configuration results from Russia’s exclusion from the SWIFT system, forcing both countries to explore alternatives such as the SPFS financial messaging system developed by the Russian central bank.

The issue of rupee accumulation in Indian banks poses a particular challenge. Billions of rupees remain blocked, with Moscow seeking ways to repatriate these funds, potentially by converting them to dirhams or yuan. This situation illustrates the limitations of a bilateral payment system when the trade deficit is imbalanced, with India importing massively more than it exports to Russia.

Flexible yet pressured refining infrastructure

Indian refining capacity, reaching 256.8 million metric tons per annum (MMTPA), offers remarkable technical flexibility. Indian refineries, notably Reliance Industries’ Jamnagar facility, have demonstrated their ability to process over 216 different grades of crude oil, theoretically allowing them to quickly adapt to new supply sources. This technical flexibility nevertheless remains limited by substantial economic considerations.

European Union sanctions on Nayara Energy and the possibility of additional sanctions from Washington have prompted Indian refiners to adopt a wait-and-see approach. Oil logistics disruptions persist at Nayara Energy’s terminal in Vadinar, with mainstream tanker operators becoming increasingly cautious about Russia-linked trades. Maritime traffic data shows relatively reduced vessel traffic at the terminal following the EU announcement.

Insufficient strategic reserves facing geopolitical risks

India’s Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) reveal significant vulnerability. With a current capacity of only 5.33 million metric tons, these reserves cover just 9.5 days of national consumption, far from the 90 days recommended by the International Energy Agency. The 2025-26 budget has allocated 5,597 crore rupees for Phase II of the ISPRL project, aiming to add 6.5 MMT of additional capacity at Chandikhol and Padur.

This expansion remains insufficient given the challenge’s magnitude. Even with commercial stocks from oil companies adding 64.5 days of coverage, India would reach only 85 days of total reserves after Phase II completion. This situation considerably limits the country’s maneuvering room in the face of potential supply disruptions.

Potentially prohibitive substitution costs

The financial impact of abandoning Russian oil would be considerable. Analysts estimate that India’s annual oil import bill could increase by $9-11 billion if the country were forced to turn away from Russian crude. This increase would represent approximately 8% of the $137 billion total oil bill recorded last year.

Middle Eastern alternatives, notably Iraq and Saudi Arabia, offer little substantial price reductions. Iraq’s Basrah crude, at $76 per barrel, offers no significant savings compared to Brent, while Iraq’s limited spare capacity makes it an unreliable substitute for disrupted Russian volumes. West Asian exporters like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, once dominant players, have been marginalized by significant Russian oil discounts.

Indian refiners are cautiously exploring diversification, seeking volumes from Nigeria, Angola, and Brazil. These nations offer medium and heavy crudes suited to Indian refining configurations. Building reliable commercial ties and logistics frameworks with these suppliers takes time, a luxury India may not have if sanctions intensify rapidly. How this situation evolves will determine whether India can maintain its economic growth while navigating the geopolitical complexities of the global energy market.

France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.
Athens and Tripoli engage in a negotiation process to define their exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean, amid geopolitical tensions and underwater energy stakes.
European powers demand concrete steps from Tehran on nuclear issue or United Nations sanctions will be reinstated, as IAEA inspections remain blocked and tensions with Washington persist.
Brussels confirms its target to end all Russian energy imports by 2028, despite growing diplomatic pressure from Washington amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump threatens to escalate US sanctions against Russia, but only if NATO member states stop all Russian oil imports, which remain active via certain pipelines.
The two countries agreed to develop infrastructure dedicated to liquefied natural gas to strengthen Europe's energy security and boost transatlantic trade.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.
Brazil’s Cop 30 presidency aims to leverage the Dubai commitments to mobilise public and private actors despite ongoing deadlock in international negotiations.
Brasília has officially begun the process of joining the International Energy Agency, strengthening its strategic position on the global energy stage after years of close cooperation with the Paris-based organisation.
During a meeting in Beijing, Vladimir Putin called on Slovakia to suspend its energy deliveries to Ukraine, citing Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy infrastructure as justification.
Vladimir Putin and Robert Fico met in China to address the war in Ukraine, regional security and energy relations between Russia and Slovakia.