India navigates between US sanctions and Russian oil dependence

Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Indian refiners are adopting a cautious approach regarding their import agreements with Russia, simultaneously intensifying efforts to further diversify their crude oil supply basket. This strategy comes as they await clearer signals regarding secondary sanctions threatened by US President Donald Trump, who has set an August 8 ultimatum for the Kremlin to agree to end the war in Ukraine.

New Delhi has given its refiners free rein to plan oil purchases with commercial viability in mind. Refiners now favor a delicate balance by increasing purchases from the United States and other non-OPEC suppliers. India has become the largest importer of Russian crude oil, with flows reaching 1.80 million barrels per day in 2024, surpassing China which imported 1.24 million barrels per day and Turkey with 0.3 million barrels per day.

Complex payment mechanisms reveal geopolitical tensions

Payment challenges constitute a crucial aspect not publicly discussed. India makes about 10% of its payments for Russian oil in Chinese yuan, with the remainder settled in Indian rupees and UAE dirhams. This complex configuration results from Russia’s exclusion from the SWIFT system, forcing both countries to explore alternatives such as the SPFS financial messaging system developed by the Russian central bank.

The issue of rupee accumulation in Indian banks poses a particular challenge. Billions of rupees remain blocked, with Moscow seeking ways to repatriate these funds, potentially by converting them to dirhams or yuan. This situation illustrates the limitations of a bilateral payment system when the trade deficit is imbalanced, with India importing massively more than it exports to Russia.

Flexible yet pressured refining infrastructure

Indian refining capacity, reaching 256.8 million metric tons per annum (MMTPA), offers remarkable technical flexibility. Indian refineries, notably Reliance Industries’ Jamnagar facility, have demonstrated their ability to process over 216 different grades of crude oil, theoretically allowing them to quickly adapt to new supply sources. This technical flexibility nevertheless remains limited by substantial economic considerations.

European Union sanctions on Nayara Energy and the possibility of additional sanctions from Washington have prompted Indian refiners to adopt a wait-and-see approach. Oil logistics disruptions persist at Nayara Energy’s terminal in Vadinar, with mainstream tanker operators becoming increasingly cautious about Russia-linked trades. Maritime traffic data shows relatively reduced vessel traffic at the terminal following the EU announcement.

Insufficient strategic reserves facing geopolitical risks

India’s Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) reveal significant vulnerability. With a current capacity of only 5.33 million metric tons, these reserves cover just 9.5 days of national consumption, far from the 90 days recommended by the International Energy Agency. The 2025-26 budget has allocated 5,597 crore rupees for Phase II of the ISPRL project, aiming to add 6.5 MMT of additional capacity at Chandikhol and Padur.

This expansion remains insufficient given the challenge’s magnitude. Even with commercial stocks from oil companies adding 64.5 days of coverage, India would reach only 85 days of total reserves after Phase II completion. This situation considerably limits the country’s maneuvering room in the face of potential supply disruptions.

Potentially prohibitive substitution costs

The financial impact of abandoning Russian oil would be considerable. Analysts estimate that India’s annual oil import bill could increase by $9-11 billion if the country were forced to turn away from Russian crude. This increase would represent approximately 8% of the $137 billion total oil bill recorded last year.

Middle Eastern alternatives, notably Iraq and Saudi Arabia, offer little substantial price reductions. Iraq’s Basrah crude, at $76 per barrel, offers no significant savings compared to Brent, while Iraq’s limited spare capacity makes it an unreliable substitute for disrupted Russian volumes. West Asian exporters like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, once dominant players, have been marginalized by significant Russian oil discounts.

Indian refiners are cautiously exploring diversification, seeking volumes from Nigeria, Angola, and Brazil. These nations offer medium and heavy crudes suited to Indian refining configurations. Building reliable commercial ties and logistics frameworks with these suppliers takes time, a luxury India may not have if sanctions intensify rapidly. How this situation evolves will determine whether India can maintain its economic growth while navigating the geopolitical complexities of the global energy market.

Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
Consent Preferences