India navigates between US sanctions and Russian oil dependence

Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.

Share:

Indian refiners are adopting a cautious approach regarding their import agreements with Russia, simultaneously intensifying efforts to further diversify their crude oil supply basket. This strategy comes as they await clearer signals regarding secondary sanctions threatened by US President Donald Trump, who has set an August 8 ultimatum for the Kremlin to agree to end the war in Ukraine.

New Delhi has given its refiners free rein to plan oil purchases with commercial viability in mind. Refiners now favor a delicate balance by increasing purchases from the United States and other non-OPEC suppliers. India has become the largest importer of Russian crude oil, with flows reaching 1.80 million barrels per day in 2024, surpassing China which imported 1.24 million barrels per day and Turkey with 0.3 million barrels per day.

Complex payment mechanisms reveal geopolitical tensions

Payment challenges constitute a crucial aspect not publicly discussed. India makes about 10% of its payments for Russian oil in Chinese yuan, with the remainder settled in Indian rupees and UAE dirhams. This complex configuration results from Russia’s exclusion from the SWIFT system, forcing both countries to explore alternatives such as the SPFS financial messaging system developed by the Russian central bank.

The issue of rupee accumulation in Indian banks poses a particular challenge. Billions of rupees remain blocked, with Moscow seeking ways to repatriate these funds, potentially by converting them to dirhams or yuan. This situation illustrates the limitations of a bilateral payment system when the trade deficit is imbalanced, with India importing massively more than it exports to Russia.

Flexible yet pressured refining infrastructure

Indian refining capacity, reaching 256.8 million metric tons per annum (MMTPA), offers remarkable technical flexibility. Indian refineries, notably Reliance Industries’ Jamnagar facility, have demonstrated their ability to process over 216 different grades of crude oil, theoretically allowing them to quickly adapt to new supply sources. This technical flexibility nevertheless remains limited by substantial economic considerations.

European Union sanctions on Nayara Energy and the possibility of additional sanctions from Washington have prompted Indian refiners to adopt a wait-and-see approach. Oil logistics disruptions persist at Nayara Energy’s terminal in Vadinar, with mainstream tanker operators becoming increasingly cautious about Russia-linked trades. Maritime traffic data shows relatively reduced vessel traffic at the terminal following the EU announcement.

Insufficient strategic reserves facing geopolitical risks

India’s Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) reveal significant vulnerability. With a current capacity of only 5.33 million metric tons, these reserves cover just 9.5 days of national consumption, far from the 90 days recommended by the International Energy Agency. The 2025-26 budget has allocated 5,597 crore rupees for Phase II of the ISPRL project, aiming to add 6.5 MMT of additional capacity at Chandikhol and Padur.

This expansion remains insufficient given the challenge’s magnitude. Even with commercial stocks from oil companies adding 64.5 days of coverage, India would reach only 85 days of total reserves after Phase II completion. This situation considerably limits the country’s maneuvering room in the face of potential supply disruptions.

Potentially prohibitive substitution costs

The financial impact of abandoning Russian oil would be considerable. Analysts estimate that India’s annual oil import bill could increase by $9-11 billion if the country were forced to turn away from Russian crude. This increase would represent approximately 8% of the $137 billion total oil bill recorded last year.

Middle Eastern alternatives, notably Iraq and Saudi Arabia, offer little substantial price reductions. Iraq’s Basrah crude, at $76 per barrel, offers no significant savings compared to Brent, while Iraq’s limited spare capacity makes it an unreliable substitute for disrupted Russian volumes. West Asian exporters like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, once dominant players, have been marginalized by significant Russian oil discounts.

Indian refiners are cautiously exploring diversification, seeking volumes from Nigeria, Angola, and Brazil. These nations offer medium and heavy crudes suited to Indian refining configurations. Building reliable commercial ties and logistics frameworks with these suppliers takes time, a luxury India may not have if sanctions intensify rapidly. How this situation evolves will determine whether India can maintain its economic growth while navigating the geopolitical complexities of the global energy market.

Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lends €400 million to JSC Energocom to diversify Moldova's gas and electricity supply, historically dependent on Russian imports via Ukraine.
BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.
The European Commission is launching an alliance with member states and industrial players to secure the supply of critical chemicals, amid growing competition from the United States and China.
Trade between Russia and Saudi Arabia grew by over 60% in 2024 to surpass USD 3.8 billion, according to Russian Minister of Industry and Trade Anton Alikhanov, who outlined new avenues for industrial cooperation.
Meeting in Rio, BRICS nations urge global energy market stability, openly condemning Western sanctions and tariff mechanisms in a tense economic and geopolitical context.