Hidden Costs: The Forgotten Legacy of Nuclear Power in the UK

The financial and ecological impact of Britain's nuclear reactors, a costly legacy to be dismantled.

Share:

Nucléaire: Un Héritage Coûteux

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90€/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90€/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 €/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99€/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 €/year from the second year.

The British nuclear industry, once a symbol of progress and innovation, now faces a colossal challenge: decommissioning its facilities. This process, which is not only costly but also protracted, raises crucial questions about the economic and environmental viability of nuclear power.

Cost Comparison: Nuclear vs Renewable Energy

The UK’s nuclear program, initiated between 1957 and 1995, led to the construction of 14 reactors, now shut down, and 9 still in operation. Designed mainly around two models – the Magnox and the AGR – these reactors were initially intended for both electricity production and, in some cases, the manufacture of weapons-grade plutonium. However, the profitability of these reactors has been called into question, especially in comparison with more economical and environmentally-friendly alternatives such as wind and solar power.
The Magnox reactors, of medium capacity (350MW) and oriented towards plutonium production, generated expensive electricity. The AGR model, subsequently designed for larger capacities (around 1.2GW), aimed for greater thermal efficiency, but with production costs that were still high.

The Future of Energy in the UK: Rethinking Nuclear Strategy

The UK government’s recent decision to support the construction of two new EPR reactors at Hinkley Point C, despite their unproven design, considerable delay and a budget 50% higher than originally forecast, is raising concerns. These reactors, while promising in terms of capacity (3.2GW cumulative), satisfy only one of the conditions necessary for the success of a modern nuclear program.

High Costs of Nuclear Decommissioning: A Burden for the Future

Furthermore, the cost of dismantling the 23 existing reactors and the two reactors under construction at Hinkley Point C is surprisingly high. According to the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), the cost would be around €149 billion by the end of 2022. Stephen Thomas, Professor of Energy Policy at the University of Greenwich, even estimates that costs could reach €260 billion, based on current cost trends.

The Reality of Nuclear Costs Compared to Renewable Alternatives

This situation highlights the real, often underestimated, cost of nuclear power. While the industry often claims that nuclear power is an economic option, these figures show otherwise. What’s more, a comparison with renewable energies such as offshore wind and solar power reveals an even greater disparity. For example, decommissioning costs for a wind or solar farm on a GW scale are much lower, in the tens of millions of euros, compared with billions for nuclear power.
It is therefore crucial to reconsider the place of nuclear power in the UK’s energy strategy, especially at a time when more affordable and environmentally-friendly alternatives are available. The transition to more sustainable and cost-effective renewable energy sources is becoming a key priority for the UK’s and the world’s energy future.

Dismantling the UK’s nuclear fleet reveals the hidden costs and environmental challenges of nuclear power. As the world turns to more sustainable energy solutions, the UK needs to rethink its energy strategy, focusing on more economical and environmentally friendly alternatives such as wind and solar power.

The International Atomic Energy Agency projects global nuclear capacity to reach 992 GW by 2050, driven by small modular reactors and lifetime extensions of existing plants.
Premier American Uranium and Nuclear Fuels have announced a target date of around September 19 to finalise their strategic consolidation, pending final approval from the TSX Venture Exchange.
The General Court of the European Union has rejected Austria’s appeal against the inclusion of gas and nuclear energy in the classification of sustainable investments.
Kazakhstan has signed an agreement with Nukem Technologies Engineering Services GmbH to benefit from German expertise in nuclear decommissioning and radioactive waste management.
The European Court of Justice annulled the European Commission's authorisation of Hungarian state aid for the Paks II nuclear project, questioning compliance with EU public procurement rules.
A Chinese consortium has secured a CNY4.2bn ($594mn) contract for the construction of conventional islands for the Xuwei nuclear project, combining third and fourth generation reactors.
Rosatom and China National Nuclear Corporation signed a memorandum of understanding to strengthen bilateral cooperation in talent development and skills training in the nuclear sector.
Iran has reached a new agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency to formalise the resumption of inspections, following months of suspension linked to military tensions and criticism of its nuclear programme.
The French Energy Regulatory Commission outlines a structured plan to accelerate the deployment of small modular reactors, focusing on industrial heat and series effects to enhance competitiveness.
US-based Nuclearn has secured $10.5mn to scale its artificial intelligence platform, already deployed in over 65 nuclear reactors, to automate critical operations amid rising energy demand.
The steel dome of the CAP1000 Haiyang 4 reactor has been positioned, a major construction milestone paving the way for upcoming maintenance and technical installation phases.
The Groupement des Industriels Français de l'Énergie Nucléaire and the Belgian Nuclear Forum formalise a partnership aimed at strengthening industrial exchanges and joint projects between the two countries’ nuclear sectors.
The International Atomic Energy Agency warns that little time remains to reach an agreement with Iran on fully resuming inspections, as European sanctions could be reimposed within 30 days.
Slovenia’s JEK2 project moves forward with two nuclear technologies judged technically compatible, estimated between EUR9.31bn ($10.1bn) and EUR15.37bn ($16.66bn).
US-based Oklo will build the country’s first privately funded nuclear fuel recycling centre in Oak Ridge, investing $1.7bn and creating over 800 jobs.
The Tennessee Valley Authority partners with ENTRA1 Energy to develop up to 6 gigawatts of modular nuclear capacity, in an unprecedented project supporting energy growth across seven U.S. states.
A report by the International Atomic Energy Agency puts Iran’s 60% enriched uranium at 440.9 kg before Israeli and U.S. strikes, while the agency’s access to enrichment sites has remained suspended since the operations.
US-based Westinghouse has signed six industrial agreements in the UK to supply critical components for its AP1000 and AP300 nuclear projects in Britain and abroad.
NANO Nuclear Energy receives direct funding from the US Air Force innovation branch to assess the integration of its KRONOS MMR™ microreactor at the Washington D.C. military base.
EDF extends the operation of Heysham 1 and Hartlepool by one year after favourable safety inspections, ensuring continuity of nuclear production and safeguarding more than 1,000 jobs.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.