Europe faced with Gazprom’s gas monopoly

Tensions between Russia and Europe are reaching a climax this week, with a drastic drop in gas supplies. Struggle between Gazprom and Naftogaz.

Share:

Poutine Zelensky

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

Tensions between Russia and Europe reached a new climax this week. This is due to gas exports at their lowest level and growing tensions with Ukraine.

Europe faced with falling Russian gas exports

Since Monday December 20, 2021, Russian gas exports through the Yamal pipeline have been at their lowest level ever. Volumes to Europe, usually around 10 million kWh/h, fell to just 370,000 on December 20, 2021.

On Wednesday December 22, measurements ranged from 900,000 to 1.6 million kWh/h, depending on the point of passage. As a result, gas prices in the Netherlands rose by a further 16% to €171.40/MWh per month on Tuesday December 21. An umpteenth record broken in a very tense energy context for Europe.

Russian gas

The worst is yet to come

But the worst is yet to come. According to Ukrainian gas company Naftogaz, Gazprom has stopped communicating its purchase offers. What’s more, the company is said to have planned only 8.3 million kWh/h of capacity to Europe from Yamal in January 2022.

Gazprom denied any manipulation, arguing that priority was given to the Russian market during periods of extreme cold. According to Gazprom, the company is complying with the legal provisions agreed with Ukraine and Europe.

Ukraine calls on Europe to end Gazprom monopoly

Against this particularly tense backdrop, Naftogaz has submitted a request to the European Commission. The company is calling on Europe to take action against Gazprom’s monopoly, which, in its words, is negative.

“Gazprom’s actions are anti-competitive and have a fundamentally negative impact on all European consumers,” says Yuriy Vitrenko, Director of Naftogaz.

Dependence on Gazprom

Gazprom has a monopoly on Russian gas pipelines under a 2006 law. This gives the company total control over all transits to Europe via Russia. As a result, exports from Central Asia and private companies are also dependent on Gazprom, which is over 50% owned by the Russian state.

An untenable situation for the Ukraine, which in fact depends on Russia for its energy supplies. The same goes for Europe, where a third of gas consumption is chartered from the Russian giant.

Russia the big winner in the crisis?

Naturally, this situation benefits Gazprom, which reaps the rewards of soaring gas prices. For 2021, the company should exceed €30 billion in profits, following record revenues between July and September 2021. Similarly, 2022 is set to see further price inflation and record profits.

However, this supremacy may not last. In Europe, this stranglehold on energy security is less and less tolerated. The Nord Stream 2 legal battle is a good illustration of this growing awareness.

In fact, the pipeline has been at a standstill since its construction, due to non-compliance with European competition rules. In addition, the new German government may reconsider its start-up despite the promised doubling of exports.

Alexei Miller

Breaking the monopoly in favor of Rosneft, also a state-owned company

On the Russian side, the government could also agree to relax Gazprom’s monopoly in favor of the oil company Rosneft. Officially, the parties involved say they want to comply with European competition rules. However, this liberalization needs to be measured.

Rosneft is state-controlled, headed by Igor Setchine, Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation. In this way, two state-controlled companies would retain control over exports.

What can Europe do in the short term?

The European Commission has formally taken note of Naftogaz’s request, but has not yet given its opinion. And for good reason: in the short term, Europe is not in a strong position to engage in head-on combat.

Gas stocks remain abnormally low for the season, and energy prices are raising fears of an economic crisis. In addition, tensions on energy markets offer few alternatives.

What to make of the Russian-Ukrainian armed conflict?

The conflict in Ukraine is also at the heart of the Gazprom issue. While Russia denies any political manipulation, the synchronicity with the situation in the Donbass is striking. In the past, Moscow has not hesitated to use gas to influence negotiations.

And for many of Europe’s chancelleries, the correlation is unmistakable. Thus, a gas war would not be conducive to resolving the conflict, which also has a significant impact on prices.

Multiplying new energy projects

Nevertheless, in the medium term, Europe is not outdone in ensuring its autonomy. Hydrogen projects are multiplying, France wants to renew its nuclear fleet, and the European Union has increased its commitment to low-carbon energies.

For many experts, the excitement surrounding gas is just one stage in the transition to renewable energies. If Russia and Gazprom benefit from this monopoly, European energy diversification could turn against Russia.

The Turkish president suggested to Vladimir Putin a limited ceasefire targeting Ukrainian ports and energy facilities to reduce risks to strategic assets and pave the way for negotiations.
New Delhi and Moscow strengthen their energy corridor despite US tariff and regulatory pressure, maintaining oil flows supported by alternative logistical and financial mechanisms.
The United States strengthens its energy presence in the Eastern Mediterranean by consolidating a gas corridor through Greece to Central Europe, to the detriment of Russian flows and Chinese logistical influence over the Port of Piraeus.
Paris and Beijing agree to create a bilateral climate task force focused on nuclear technologies, renewable energy and maritime sectors, amid escalating trade tensions between China and the European Union.
Ankara plans to invest in US gas production to secure LNG supply and become a key supplier to Southern Europe, according to the Turkish Energy Minister.
Three Russian tankers targeted off the Turkish coast have reignited Ankara’s concerns about oil and gas supply security in the Black Sea and the vulnerability of its subsea infrastructure.
Bucharest authorises an exceptional takeover of Lukoil’s local assets to avoid a supply shock while complying with international sanctions. Three buyers are already in advanced talks.
European governments want to add review and safeguard mechanisms to the trade deal with Washington to prevent a potential surge of US imports from disrupting their industrial base.
The Khor Mor gas field, operated by Pearl Petroleum, was hit by an armed drone, halting production and causing power outages affecting 80% of Kurdistan’s electricity capacity.
Global South Utilities is investing $1 billion in new solar, wind and storage projects to strengthen Yemen's energy capacity and expand its regional influence.
British International Investment and FirstRand partner to finance the decarbonisation of African companies through a facility focused on supporting high-emission sectors.
Budapest moves to secure Serbian oil supply, threatened by Croatia’s suspension of crude flows following US sanctions on the Russian-controlled NIS refinery.
Moscow says it wants to increase oil and liquefied natural gas exports to Beijing, while consolidating bilateral cooperation amid US sanctions targeting Russian producers.
The European Investment Bank is mobilising €2bn in financing backed by the European Commission for energy projects in Africa, with a strategic objective rooted in the European Union’s energy diplomacy.
Russia faces a structural decline in energy revenues as strengthened sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil disrupt trade flows and deepen the federal budget deficit.
Washington imposes new sanctions targeting vessels, shipowners and intermediaries in Asia, increasing the regulatory risk of Iranian oil trade and redefining maritime compliance in the region.
OFAC’s licence for Paks II circumvents sanctions on Rosatom in exchange for US technological involvement, reshaping the balance of interests between Moscow, Budapest and Washington.
Finland, Estonia, Hungary and Czechia are multiplying bilateral initiatives in Africa to capture strategic energy and mining projects under the European Global Gateway programme.
The Brazilian president calls for a voluntary and non-binding energy transition during COP30 in Belém, avoiding direct confrontation with oil-producing countries.
The region attracted only a small share of global capital allocated to renewables in 2024, despite high energy needs and ambitious development goals, according to a report published in November.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.