Europe faced with Gazprom’s gas monopoly

Tensions between Russia and Europe are reaching a climax this week, with a drastic drop in gas supplies. Struggle between Gazprom and Naftogaz.

Share:

Poutine Zelensky

Subscribe for unlimited access to all energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

Your 1st year at 99 $*

then 199 $/year

*renews at 199$/year, cancel anytime before renewal.

Tensions between Russia and Europe reached a new climax this week. This is due to gas exports at their lowest level and growing tensions with Ukraine.

Europe faced with falling Russian gas exports

Since Monday December 20, 2021, Russian gas exports through the Yamal pipeline have been at their lowest level ever. Volumes to Europe, usually around 10 million kWh/h, fell to just 370,000 on December 20, 2021.

On Wednesday December 22, measurements ranged from 900,000 to 1.6 million kWh/h, depending on the point of passage. As a result, gas prices in the Netherlands rose by a further 16% to €171.40/MWh per month on Tuesday December 21. An umpteenth record broken in a very tense energy context for Europe.

Russian gas

The worst is yet to come

But the worst is yet to come. According to Ukrainian gas company Naftogaz, Gazprom has stopped communicating its purchase offers. What’s more, the company is said to have planned only 8.3 million kWh/h of capacity to Europe from Yamal in January 2022.

Gazprom denied any manipulation, arguing that priority was given to the Russian market during periods of extreme cold. According to Gazprom, the company is complying with the legal provisions agreed with Ukraine and Europe.

Ukraine calls on Europe to end Gazprom monopoly

Against this particularly tense backdrop, Naftogaz has submitted a request to the European Commission. The company is calling on Europe to take action against Gazprom’s monopoly, which, in its words, is negative.

“Gazprom’s actions are anti-competitive and have a fundamentally negative impact on all European consumers,” says Yuriy Vitrenko, Director of Naftogaz.

Dependence on Gazprom

Gazprom has a monopoly on Russian gas pipelines under a 2006 law. This gives the company total control over all transits to Europe via Russia. As a result, exports from Central Asia and private companies are also dependent on Gazprom, which is over 50% owned by the Russian state.

An untenable situation for the Ukraine, which in fact depends on Russia for its energy supplies. The same goes for Europe, where a third of gas consumption is chartered from the Russian giant.

Russia the big winner in the crisis?

Naturally, this situation benefits Gazprom, which reaps the rewards of soaring gas prices. For 2021, the company should exceed €30 billion in profits, following record revenues between July and September 2021. Similarly, 2022 is set to see further price inflation and record profits.

However, this supremacy may not last. In Europe, this stranglehold on energy security is less and less tolerated. The Nord Stream 2 legal battle is a good illustration of this growing awareness.

In fact, the pipeline has been at a standstill since its construction, due to non-compliance with European competition rules. In addition, the new German government may reconsider its start-up despite the promised doubling of exports.

Alexei Miller

Breaking the monopoly in favor of Rosneft, also a state-owned company

On the Russian side, the government could also agree to relax Gazprom’s monopoly in favor of the oil company Rosneft. Officially, the parties involved say they want to comply with European competition rules. However, this liberalization needs to be measured.

Rosneft is state-controlled, headed by Igor Setchine, Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation. In this way, two state-controlled companies would retain control over exports.

What can Europe do in the short term?

The European Commission has formally taken note of Naftogaz’s request, but has not yet given its opinion. And for good reason: in the short term, Europe is not in a strong position to engage in head-on combat.

Gas stocks remain abnormally low for the season, and energy prices are raising fears of an economic crisis. In addition, tensions on energy markets offer few alternatives.

What to make of the Russian-Ukrainian armed conflict?

The conflict in Ukraine is also at the heart of the Gazprom issue. While Russia denies any political manipulation, the synchronicity with the situation in the Donbass is striking. In the past, Moscow has not hesitated to use gas to influence negotiations.

And for many of Europe’s chancelleries, the correlation is unmistakable. Thus, a gas war would not be conducive to resolving the conflict, which also has a significant impact on prices.

Multiplying new energy projects

Nevertheless, in the medium term, Europe is not outdone in ensuring its autonomy. Hydrogen projects are multiplying, France wants to renew its nuclear fleet, and the European Union has increased its commitment to low-carbon energies.

For many experts, the excitement surrounding gas is just one stage in the transition to renewable energies. If Russia and Gazprom benefit from this monopoly, European energy diversification could turn against Russia.

First suspect linked to the Nord Stream pipeline explosions, a Ukrainian citizen challenged by Berlin opposes his judicial transfer from Italy.
Ukrainian drones targeted a nuclear power plant and a Russian oil terminal, increasing pressure on diplomatic talks as Moscow and Kyiv accuse each other of blocking any prospect of negotiation.
A Ukrainian national suspected of coordinating the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage has been apprehended in Italy, reigniting a judicial case with significant geopolitical implications across Europe.
Russia continues hydrocarbon deliveries to India and explores new outlets for liquefied natural gas, amid escalating trade tensions with the United States.
Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.

or

Go unlimited with our annual offer: $99 for the 1styear year, then $ 199/year.