COP29 in Baku: A Climate Summit Under Post-U.S. Election Tensions

World leaders will gather in Baku for COP29, a climate summit that may be disrupted by the U.S. election results, with crucial stakes surrounding the financing of the fight against global warming.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €2/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The upcoming United Nations Conference on Climate Change, or COP29, will be held in Baku from November 11 to 22. This summit is centered on the issue of climate financing, a crucial matter for developing countries facing the growing challenges of climate change. While the annual financing target of $100 billion set in 2009 was belatedly achieved in 2022, COP29 aims to establish a new financial goal to meet the current and future needs of vulnerable nations affected by global warming.

However, international negotiations could be influenced by the results of the U.S. presidential election, which will occur just days before the summit. The potential return of Donald Trump to the presidency raises concerns among delegates and observers. During his first term, Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, casting doubt on American commitment to international climate goals. Although the U.S. is not the largest bilateral climate aid provider, its role remains central to negotiations, and a shift in American climate policy could impact global momentum.

A Fragile Geopolitical Context

COP29 unfolds in a tense geopolitical climate marked by major conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, as well as trade tensions between the West and China. Additionally, many developed countries are adopting austerity policies, limiting their room to finance climate projects. The question of who will finance the next steps of the green transition remains unanswered, as financial needs are estimated by some experts at approximately $1 trillion per year.

Rachel Cleetus, a member of the Union of Concerned Scientists, emphasizes that this is a necessity rather than an option. She notes that without immediate investments, the long-term costs associated with climate-related disasters and pollution will be much higher. Amid geopolitical divisions, some observers argue that the pressure to expand the contributor base to emerging economies like China and the Gulf States may reignite North-South tensions.

The Shadow of the U.S. Election

Li Shuo, an expert from the Asia Society Policy Institute, warns that if Donald Trump is re-elected, a “crisis moment” could emerge in negotiations. China, for its part, has pledged to send a message of continuity, expressing hope that the United States will maintain a stable climate policy. Other countries will likely wait for the election results before finalizing their long-term climate commitments, illustrating the critical role of American policy in global climate dynamics.

In 2015, the Paris Agreement set a goal of limiting warming to well below 2°C, with an ambition of 1.5°C. However, global warming has already reached 1.3°C, and the United Nations Environment Program estimates that current pledges would lead to a temperature increase of 2.6°C to 2.8°C by 2100, far exceeding the set thresholds. The impacts of warming are already visible, with more frequent and intense heat waves, droughts, and floods.

A Financial Tug-of-War

Negotiations over financing are particularly sensitive given that Baku, the host country, is a major hydrocarbon exporter. During COP28 in Dubai, a transition towards phasing out fossil fuels was discussed. This theme may resurface, highlighting the contradictions between political discourse and the economic realities of some countries.

Wealthier nations, currently the main contributors, argue for other actors, such as China or Gulf countries, to also participate in climate financing. This position encounters complexities around historical responsibilities and current financial capacities, generating intense debate. Some experts emphasize the urgency of directing funding toward the green economy, particularly by promoting renewable energy, electric vehicles, and energy storage technologies.

Nations are also preparing for COP30 in Brazil, where they will need to submit new climate commitments. According to Li Shuo, beyond UN commitments, progress is increasingly visible in sectors like solar energy, wind power, and technological innovation. The private sector and countries investing in the green economy seem to be leading the transition, suggesting that climate dynamics may gradually shift from large diplomatic summits to a focus on economic and technological advancements.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.