CCS-EOR: An Emerging Pillar of Energy Decarbonization

An analysis by Wood Mackenzie reveals that CCS-EOR could often offer lower net emissions than CCS-Storage, thereby reinforcing the energy transition.

Share:

CCS-EOR Transition Énergétique Viable

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

CO2 capture for enhanced oil recovery (CCS-EOR) has been less favored in recent years than capture for dedicated sequestration (CCS-Storage).
However, a new study by Wood Mackenzie shows that CCS-EOR could often result in lower net emissions and better support the energy transition.
Contrary to critics who claim that CCS-EOR prolongs hydrocarbon production and worsens climate change, this analysis demonstrates that even in the most ambitious decarbonization scenarios, the development of new sources of oil remains indispensable.
According to Wood Mackenzie forecasts, global oil demand could reach 30 million barrels per day by 2050, even in the most aggressive emission reduction scenarios.
The company’s “Enhanced oil recovery with captured CO2” series of reports points out that CCS-EOR could replace almost all volumes produced on the world market, with no significant impact on oil demand and associated emissions.

Grants and Economy

The report points out that subsidizing CCS-EOR on a smaller commercial scale than CCS-Storage, or even CCU (Carbon Capture and Utilisation), would result in reduced overall CO2 capture and less decarbonization for the economic burden imposed.
Currently, subsidies for CCS-EOR are lower in Canada and the USA, which paradoxically indirectly subsidizes other, higher-emitting sources of oil supply outside their jurisdiction, thus weakening national energy security.
Peter Findlay, Director of CCUS Economics at Wood Mackenzie, explains that “CCS-EOR can offer a pragmatic solution for the energy transition, reducing the carbon footprint compared to traditional oil and gas operations”.
However, this is only true if the CO2 used in EOR operations comes from anthropogenic sources, such as industrial sources or Direct Air Capture (DAC).

Viable strategy for growers

Companies seeking to maximize shareholder returns, decarbonize their portfolios and maintain supply in times of geopolitical tension could find CCS-EOR a suitable solution.
This approach would enable producers to vary production between EOR and non-EOR wells according to oil and carbon market conditions.
Some companies, such as Denbury and Occidental Petroleum, are exploring the possibility of pushing the benefit of capture up the product value chain to create net-zero oil.
However, the accounting and delineation details of what is included in the net-zero oil calculation are essential.
At present, this approach is not yet economically viable for producers without an increase in market demand.
The report concludes that, as with many other decarbonization initiatives, the expansion of CCS-EOR to a significant scale requires some certainty about future subsidy schemes or carbon prices – a clear incentive to decarbonize.
An enforced carbon price would encourage CCS-EOR production sufficiently to stimulate its growth over other options.

An NGO identified 531 participants linked to carbon capture and storage technologies at COP30, illustrating the growing strategic interest of industry players in this technical lever within climate negotiations.
Driven by rising demand from China and India, the global carbon neutrality market is expected to grow by 7.3 % annually through 2035, supported by sustained investment in capture technologies.
Japan plans to increase its carbon capture, utilisation and storage capacity thirtyfold by 2035, but reliance on cross-border infrastructure may delay the government’s targets.
PETRONAS secures Malaysia’s first CCS permit and strengthens its upstream presence in Suriname, aligning an integrated strategy between CO₂ capture and low-cost offshore exploration.
The Peruvian government announces a 179 million tonne emissions target by 2035, integrating carbon market tools and international transfers to reach its climate goal.
The Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism formalizes a landfill-methane methodology, imposes an investment-based additionality test, and governs issuance of traceable units via a central registry, with host-country authorizations and corresponding adjustments required.
Sinopec and BASF have reached a mutual recognition agreement on their carbon accounting methods, certified as compliant with both Chinese and international standards, amid growing industrial standardisation efforts.
NorthX Climate Tech strengthens its portfolio by investing in four carbon dioxide removal companies, reinforcing Canada’s position in a rapidly expanding global market.
With dense industrial activity and unique geological potential, Texas is attracting massive investment in carbon capture and storage, reinforced by new federal tax incentives.
GE Vernova and YTL PowerSeraya will assess the feasibility of capturing 90% of CO₂ emissions at a planned 600-megawatt gas-fired power plant in Singapore.
The carbon removal technology sector is expanding rapidly, backed by venture capital and industrial projects, yet high costs remain a significant barrier to scaling.
A Wood Mackenzie study reveals that the EU’s carbon storage capacity will fall more than 40% short of the 2030 targets set under the Net Zero Industry Act.
A bilateral framework governs authorization, transfer and accounting of carbon units from conservation projects, with stricter methodologies and enhanced traceability, likely to affect creditable volumes, prices and contracts. —
Carbon Direct and JPMorganChase have released a guide to help voluntary carbon market stakeholders develop biodiversity-focused projects while meeting carbon reduction criteria.
Japan and Malaysia have signed a preliminary cooperation protocol aiming to establish a regulatory foundation for cross-border carbon dioxide transport as part of future carbon capture and storage projects.
Green Plains has commissioned a carbon capture system in York, Nebraska, marking the first step in an industrial programme integrating CO₂ geological storage across multiple sites.
The price of nature-based carbon credits dropped to $13.30/mtCO2e in October as a 94% surge in September issuances far outpaced corporate demand.
Driven by the energy, heavy industry and power generation sectors, the global carbon capture and storage market could reach $6.6bn by 2034, supported by an annual growth rate of 5.8%.
Article 6 converts carbon credits into a compliance asset, driven by sovereign purchases, domestic markets, and sectoral schemes, with annual demand projected above 700 Mt and supply constrained by timelines, levies, and CA requirements.
The GOCO2 project enters public consultation with six industrial players united around a 375 km network aiming to capture, transport and export 2.2 million tonnes of CO2 per year starting in 2031.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.