Would Blockchain Solve Global Warming?

Share:

blockchai energy

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

Blockchain could be the key to effective tracking of carbon emissions throughout the supply chain. This solution could prove useful in a context of global warming. Energy systems are currently aiming for decarbonization. Promoting transparency will be key to ensuring that entities in the global supply chain comply with the new emissions standards. So the supply chain could have a role to play.

How do you measure a product’s environmental impact?

Take into account all stages of a product’s life cycle

There has been much debate about how to assess whether a product is truly sustainable. But is it enough to look at the emissions of the company that sells it to the end customer?

First, we need to assess a product’s impact at every stage of its life cycle. From the extraction of raw materials to the disposal or recycling process.

This measurement process is known as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). It’s the calculation and evaluation of the various impacts that a product or project can have on environmental, social and economic aspects.

But after all, what is a product if not the result of all its production stages?

climate blockchain
Digitally tracking carbon emissions throughout the chain can help the energy industry track its emissions footprint.

Blockchain “decomplexes” product tracing

The problem is that tracing all these production stages is difficult in a globalized world. This is because they are usually geographically dispersed, carried out by several different players or entities, often in several different facilities, and using several different technologies.

Globalization has considerably increased the complexity of supply chains. This complexity poses a number of challenges in terms of controlling and monitoring these impacts at every stage of the life cycle. The fact that companies often have a restricted view of their limits is also a factor.

Scope 3 emissions are difficult to measure, but must be taken into account.

The different emissions “scopes

In the context of global warming, analyzing the classification of carbon emissions is relevant. These carbon emissions can be evaluated in three categories, known as scopes:

Scope 1 carbon emissions are the direct result of sources owned or controlled by the company. Scope 2 emissions represent carbon emissions indirectly generated by energy purchased and consumed during production. Finally, scope 3 emissions are indirect emissions throughout the value chain of a product or company. Scope 3 carbon emissions also include the use of a product by the end consumer.

To find out more about scopes and how carbon emissions are classified, read our article on the subject.

The importance of measuring Scope 3 emissions

Scope 3 emissions are the most comprehensive measure of impact. Indeed, the latter can account for up to 75% of a product’s total emissions footprint. But they are also the most difficult to calculate.

Supply chain emissions require a high level of integration and coordination between its multiple networks.

Different entities must share the data needed to certify the sustainability of products and guarantee their traceability. This step is therefore essential. Anything that can be quantified is no longer a risk, but becomes a management issue.

blokchain energy

Traceability and data transparency are essential for monitoring emissions

Data sharing can have two main objectives: transparency and traceability. These terms are often confused, but they imply different objectives.

Improving transparency to get to know the players

Transparency aims to gather high-level information on supply chains. This is achieved by mapping the value chain network in terms of supplier names, facility locations, product attributes and certification.

The main aim of improving transparency is to make it clearer which paths a product follows along supply chains. This makes it possible to gather information on the players involved at every stage.

Improved traceability for better impact measurement

Traceability, on the other hand, requires a higher degree of granularity in the information shared. This information can be, for example, the dates and places of purchase of product components, specific item properties or more operational information.

Increased traceability enables more precise measurement of impacts at every stage of the supply chain. It enables data-driven strategies to be developed and sustainability claims to be verified.

Blockchain can digitally certify carbon emissions footprint

How to track carbon emissions with blockchain

The blockchain’s large distributed ledger can record consumption data from different entities in different locations in real time. We can then calculate the carbon intensity of this consumption.

Finally, we can automatically assign a certificate supplied with the transferred energy. This certificate proves where and when the energy was produced.

Blockchain makes it possible to certify energy emissions

Blockchain can improve the energy system by ensuring trust, traceability and auditability. A digital process called “electricity tokenization” makes this possible. Through this process, units of electricity become digital goods or assets. This enables automatic generation of time-stamped certificates. Transfer and tracking of ownership (based on cryptographic evidence) are also possible.

This process also ensures that certificates are sold only once, and that there is no double counting. Auditors can trace electricity consumed in the supply chain to any stage in its lifecycle.

It’s the only real way to slow global warming throughout the supply chain, and to be totally ecological at all times.

The Australian government plans to introduce a free solar electricity offer in several regions starting in July 2026, to optimize the management of the electricity grid during peak production periods.
India is implementing new reforms to effectively integrate renewable energy into the national grid, with a focus on storage projects and improved contracting.
China added a record 264 GW of wind and solar capacity in the first half of 2025, but the introduction of a new competitive pricing mechanism for future projects may put pressure on prices and affect developer profitability.
The government confirmed that the majority sale of Exaion by EDF to Mara will be subject to the foreign investment control procedure, with a response expected by the end of December.
A week before COP30, Brazil announces an unprecedented drop in greenhouse gas emissions, driven mainly by reduced deforestation, with uneven sectorial dynamics, amid controversial offshore oil exploration.
The Catabola electrification project, delivered by Mitrelli, marks the first connection to the national grid for several communities in Bié Province.
The Algerian government plans a full upgrade of the SCADA system, managed by Sonelgaz, to improve control and supervision of the national electricity grid starting in 2026.
Facing annual losses estimated at up to $66mn, SEEG is intensifying field inspections and preparing the rollout of smart meters to combat illegal connections.
The British government confirms its ambition to decarbonise the power sector by 2030, despite political criticism and concerns over consumer energy costs.
Enedis plans a €250mn ($264mn) investment to strengthen Marseille’s electricity grid by 2030, including the full removal of paper-insulated cables and support for the port’s electrification.
Energy ministers coordinate investment and traceability to curb China’s dominance in mineral refining and stabilize supply chains vital to electronics, defense, and energy under a common G7 framework.
Electricity demand, amplified by the rise of artificial intelligence, exceeds forecasts and makes the 2050 net-zero target unattainable, according to new projections by consulting firm Wood Mackenzie.
Norway's sovereign wealth fund generated a €88 billion profit in the third quarter, largely driven by equity market performances in commodities, telecommunications, and finance.
The German regulator is preparing a reform favourable to grid operators, aiming to adjust returns and efficiency rules from 2028 for gas pipelines and 2029 for electricity networks.
Bill Gates urges governments and investors to prioritise adaptation to warming effects, advocating for increased funding in health and development across vulnerable countries.
The Malaysian government plans to increase public investment in natural gas and solar energy to reduce coal dependency while ensuring energy cost stability for households and businesses.
The study by Özlem Onaran and Cem Oyvat highlights structural limits in public climate finance, underscoring the need for closer alignment with social and economic goals to strengthen the efficiency and resilience of public spending.
Oil major ExxonMobil is challenging two California laws requiring disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions and climate risks, arguing that the mandates violate freedom of speech.
The European Court of Human Rights ruled that Norway’s deferral of a climate impact assessment did not breach procedural safeguards under the Convention, upholding the country’s 2016 oil licensing decisions.
Singapore strengthens its energy strategy through public investments in nuclear, regional electricity interconnections and gas infrastructure to secure its long-term supply.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.