Washington and Tehran Negotiate, Moscow Validates a Strategic Nuclear Pact

As Russia ratifies a 20-year civil nuclear agreement with Iran, the United States reopens indirect talks in Oman. Tehran demands the lifting of sanctions, while 275 kg of uranium enriched to 60% raises concerns.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Russia has finalized a 20-year civil nuclear agreement with Iran, thereby strengthening a partnership that draws international attention. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Tehran possesses approximately 275 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%, a level considered sensitive. The United States, under President Donald Trump, is considering reopening indirect talks in Oman. Tehran, for its part, demands the lifting of the economic sanctions imposed since 2018, a condition deemed essential for any diplomatic progress.

Strategic Partnership and International Stakes

The text ratified by the Duma provides for the construction and supervision of new reactors at the Bushehr site, with technology transfer from Moscow. Some observers highlight the strategic dimension of this cooperation, given that both countries are under Western sanctions. The Kremlin, through its spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, confirmed that Russia supports any initiative likely to reduce regional tensions. However, the possibility of dual-use nuclear technology is causing concern among several stakeholders closely monitoring Iran’s program.
The American withdrawal from the 2015 international nuclear agreement marked a turning point, leading to the resumption of punitive measures against Iran’s energy sector. Washington now claims to be ready to negotiate, subject to Iranian guarantees regarding the purely civilian nature of its nuclear program. President Donald Trump mentioned the possibility of direct talks, although Tehran continues to favor an indirect channel. Envoys from both sides are thus preparing to meet separately in Oman, a nation historically engaged in mediation.

Indirect Negotiations and Regional Reactions

Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s Foreign Minister, emphasized that his country remains open to compromise, provided that U.S. sanctions are fully lifted. According to official sources, the U.S. Special Representative for the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, is expected to travel to Oman to meet with Omani and Iranian intermediaries. Tehran, however, maintains that no direct meeting with Washington is planned. Iranian authorities believe the ball is in the American court, asserting they have demonstrated their willingness to honor their civilian commitments.
China and Russia, Iran’s longstanding diplomatic partners, publicly support the path of negotiation. The Kremlin reiterated its support for any political solution aiming to regulate Iran’s nuclear program, citing potential for de-escalation in the region. Beijing also urged the parties to avoid any provocation that could jeopardize the talks. This atmosphere of openness reflects a convergence of interests among powers seeking appeasement, despite lingering international antagonisms.

Diplomatic Prospects and IAEA Monitoring

The International Atomic Energy Agency stresses the need for enhanced inspections, given Iran’s significant stockpile of enriched uranium. Inspector reports highlight Tehran’s current cooperation, while underlining the importance of transparency to avoid misunderstandings. Several governments are questioning the link between the Russia-Iran partnership and non-proliferation objectives, as the accumulation of fissile materials remains under scrutiny. The planned talks in Oman and subsequent diplomatic exchanges may influence the course of this issue, at the intersection of geopolitics and the energy market.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
Consent Preferences