Warsaw denies involvement in sabotage of Nord Stream pipeline

The Polish government firmly denies accusations of complicity in the sabotage of the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022, claiming that this is a disinformation maneuver aimed at dividing NATO.

Share:

Sabotage Nord Stream Pologne

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Poland’s Deputy Prime Minister, Krzysztof Gawkowski, has categorically rejected recent accusations that Poland helped organize the sabotage of the Nord Stream gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea.
These accusations, made by August Hanning, former head of the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), suggest that Poland provided logistical support to a Ukrainian team responsible for the attack, at the instigation of its leaders.
Gawkowski calls these allegations “lies”, attributing them to a disinformation campaign orchestrated by Russia.
Hanning’s claims, echoed by several media outlets, posit that the operation required an agreement between the Ukrainian and Polish presidents.
Warsaw, in response, maintains that no evidence can support these accusations, insisting that Poland played no part in the incident.

Investigation and prosecution

As part of the German investigation, the Polish prosecutor’s office has confirmed that it has received an arrest warrant from Berlin for a Ukrainian citizen living in Poland, suspected of having taken part in the operation.
The latter had reportedly left Polish territory before the warrant was issued.
The German investigation is continuing, but Warsaw is adamant that it will not become involved.
This situation highlights the complex relations between Eastern European countries and Russia, exacerbated by recent conflicts.
The Nord Stream affair is part of a series of accusations and counter-accusations between the states involved, each seeking to absolve itself of any responsibility.

Ukrainian reaction and geopolitical implications

Ukraine, through presidential advisor Mykhailo Podoliak, also rejects any involvement, calling the accusations “nonsense”.
Kiev maintains that there is no strategic interest in sabotaging an infrastructure so vital to Europe’s energy supply.
These denials come at a time when each side is seeking to defend its position while accusing the other of manipulation.
The Nord Stream sabotage affair has major repercussions for European energy security.
It has heightened geopolitical tensions and raised the question of how to protect critical infrastructures in the face of increasingly sophisticated threats.
The response from the Polish and Ukrainian authorities reflects their determination to maintain the integrity of their positions, while highlighting the dangers of disinformation in an environment already under pressure.

A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Consent Preferences