Venezuela: political tensions and US sanctions impact oil prices

Recent US sanctions against Venezuelan officials aim to weaken support for Maduro's regime, while raising questions about the long-term impact on the country's oil sector and economic stability.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Venezuela’s political and economic landscape continues to evolve, marked by growing tensions between Nicolás Maduro’s government and the United States.
Recently, the US Treasury Department imposed sanctions on 16 officials aligned with Maduro, including members of the National Electoral Council and the Supreme Court of Justice.
The sanctions follow July’s disputed election, which was widely criticized for its lack of transparency and fairness.
The sanctions aim to weaken Maduro’s institutional support, targeting those who have helped maintain his power.
The sanctions include key figures such as the judge and prosecutor who authorized the arrest warrant for opposition presidential candidate Edmundo González Urrutia.
The latter has since fled the country and sought protection in Spain.
In parallel, the US State Department has also introduced new visa restrictions for officials aligned with Maduro.
A State Department official said these measures should prompt officials to reflect on the consequences of supporting a regime that seeks to maintain power through questionable means.

Impact on the energy sector

Experts believe that these sanctions will have no immediate impact on the Venezuelan oil sector.
Rachel Ziemba, Senior Consultant at Horizon Engage, points out that the individuals sanctioned are not directly linked to the energy industry.
Moreover, there is no indication that the US is considering modifying the company-specific licenses that have recently been granted.
It notes that, while sanctions complicate the situation in the long term, global supply and demand fundamentals remain key drivers for oil markets.
However, political developments could influence the oil sector.
Fernando Ferreira, Director of Geopolitical Risk at Rapidan Energy Group, mentions that diplomatic tensions, such as those between Venezuela and Spain, could damage investor confidence.
Jorge Rodríguez, President of the Venezuelan Parliament, recently called for diplomatic relations with Spain to be broken off, which could have repercussions on investment efforts in the country.

Political and legislative reactions

U.S. legislators, such as Senator Dick Durbin, are also working on legislative proposals concerning Venezuela.
Durbin has introduced a bill to halt all U.S.-Venezuela oil cooperation until election results are respected.
In a statement, he asserted that “the Maduro regime is clinging to power thanks to oil revenues dependent on U.S. involvement”.
This bill could have significant implications for the Venezuelan economy, which relies heavily on oil exports.
Recent sanctions have also affected several members of the Supreme Court of Justice, which certified Maduro’s election victory.
Among those sanctioned are judges and prosecutors who played a role in the crackdown on political opponents.
Maduro’s government has rejected the sanctions, calling them illegitimate and aggressive.
Yván Gil, Chancellor of the Republic, said the measures were an attack on Venezuela’s sovereignty.

Future prospects

In the short term, the sanctions are unlikely to disrupt oil production, which rose slightly to 914,000 barrels per day in August.
However, the medium-term outlook remains uncertain.
Experts agree that the unstable political situation and international tensions could slow down the investments needed to revive the oil sector.
Venezuela’s dependence on oil revenues, combined with increasing sanctions, creates a difficult environment for any economic recovery.
Sanctions and political tensions underline the complexity of the situation in Venezuela.
As Maduro’s government continues to face internal and external challenges, the international community is keeping a close eye on developments.
Decisions taken by the US and others could have lasting repercussions on the country’s political and economic stability, as well as on the global oil market.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.