United States: LNG projects face regulatory and environmental challenges

Regulation of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects in the USA is evolving rapidly, with major implications for the Rio Grande and Texas LNG projects. Recent court rulings highlight the tensions between economic development and environmental concerns.

Share:

Rio Grande LNG, United States

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The regulation of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects in the United States is in a state of flux, particularly with recent developments concerning the Rio Grande LNG and Texas LNG projects.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced that it will conduct a supplemental environmental assessment for these projects, following a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
This decision, issued on August 6, 2024, vacated and remanded the certificate authorizations for these facilities, highlighting deficiencies in the analysis of impacts on environmental justice and air quality.
LNG projects, aimed at increasing U.S. export capacity, face heightened regulatory risks.
FERC has indicated that new environmental studies, expected to be finalized by the end of July 2025, will examine the environmental impacts identified by the court.
This includes a reassessment of environmental justice impacts and a revised air quality analysis, as well as an evaluation of alternatives to the project, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems.

Impact of court rulings on LNG projects

Regulatory delays pose significant challenges for developers, particularly Rio Grande developer NextDecade, which has already begun construction on the first phase of its project.
The court ruled in favor of the environmental groups challenging the project approvals, claiming that FERC had not sufficiently considered environmental justice impacts.
In response, NextDecade asked FERC to withdraw its CCS proposal, which could have implications for the viability of the project.
FERC also clarified that the final environmental reports for both projects will be based on the agency’s previous analyses, including those from 2019.
These new studies are crucial in determining whether FERC will re-grant the necessary permits for the construction and operation of the LNG facilities.
The Rio Grande and Texas LNG projects, which aim to meet the growing demand for LNG in international markets, must navigate a complex and constantly evolving regulatory landscape.

Business developments and future prospects

NextDecade announced a final investment decision (FID) in July 2022 for the first phase of its project, which comprises three liquefaction trains with a production capacity of 17.6 million metric tons per year.
The company had planned to make a decision on a fourth train by the end of 2024, after signing an engineering, procurement and construction contract with Bechtel.
A total of five trains were proposed, which could increase the terminal’s production capacity to around 27 million tonnes per year.
Meanwhile, the Texas LNG project, which has a capacity of around 4 million tonnes per year, has also announced several commercial agreements in 2024 to support its goal of commercial sanction by the end of the year.
These developments underline the strategic importance of these projects for the USA, as it seeks to strengthen its position in the global LNG market.
However, regulatory uncertainties and legal challenges could influence developers’ ability to realize their ambitions.

Analysis of environmental and regulatory issues

The new environmental studies requested by FERC are intended to address concerns raised by the court regarding the analysis of environmental impacts.
The court criticized FERC for failing to issue additional environmental impact studies on environmental justice for each project, as well as for its assessment of CCS for the Rio Grande project.
In addition, the commission did not explain why it had chosen not to consider air quality data from a nearby monitor, which was also a point of contention.
FERC had originally approved the Texas LNG and Rio Grande LNG projects, as well as the Rio Bravo natural gas pipeline, in November 2019.
However, the court found flaws in the climate considerations and environmental justice analysis, leading to a remand of the approvals back to FERC without rescinding them.
The commission reauthorized the projects in April 2023, but legal challenges persist, further complicating the situation for developers.

Outlook for future LNG projects

LNG projects in the United States, particularly Rio Grande and Texas LNG, are at a critical crossroads.
Recent regulatory and judicial decisions highlight the tensions between economic development and environmental concerns.
As companies seek to meet the growing demand for LNG in international markets, they must also navigate an increasingly demanding regulatory environment.
The results of new environmental studies and future FERC decisions will determine the future of these projects.
Developers must not only comply with regulatory requirements, but also anticipate the reactions of environmental groups and local communities.
The ability of the United States to maintain its position in the global LNG market will largely depend on how these challenges are met.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.