United States: LNG projects face regulatory and environmental challenges

Regulation of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects in the USA is evolving rapidly, with major implications for the Rio Grande and Texas LNG projects. Recent court rulings highlight the tensions between economic development and environmental concerns.

Share:

Rio Grande LNG, United States

Subscribe for unlimited access to all energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

Your 1st year at 99 €*

then 199 €/year

*renews at 199€/year, cancel anytime before renewal.

The regulation of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects in the United States is in a state of flux, particularly with recent developments concerning the Rio Grande LNG and Texas LNG projects.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced that it will conduct a supplemental environmental assessment for these projects, following a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
This decision, issued on August 6, 2024, vacated and remanded the certificate authorizations for these facilities, highlighting deficiencies in the analysis of impacts on environmental justice and air quality.
LNG projects, aimed at increasing U.S. export capacity, face heightened regulatory risks.
FERC has indicated that new environmental studies, expected to be finalized by the end of July 2025, will examine the environmental impacts identified by the court.
This includes a reassessment of environmental justice impacts and a revised air quality analysis, as well as an evaluation of alternatives to the project, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems.

Impact of court rulings on LNG projects

Regulatory delays pose significant challenges for developers, particularly Rio Grande developer NextDecade, which has already begun construction on the first phase of its project.
The court ruled in favor of the environmental groups challenging the project approvals, claiming that FERC had not sufficiently considered environmental justice impacts.
In response, NextDecade asked FERC to withdraw its CCS proposal, which could have implications for the viability of the project.
FERC also clarified that the final environmental reports for both projects will be based on the agency’s previous analyses, including those from 2019.
These new studies are crucial in determining whether FERC will re-grant the necessary permits for the construction and operation of the LNG facilities.
The Rio Grande and Texas LNG projects, which aim to meet the growing demand for LNG in international markets, must navigate a complex and constantly evolving regulatory landscape.

Business developments and future prospects

NextDecade announced a final investment decision (FID) in July 2022 for the first phase of its project, which comprises three liquefaction trains with a production capacity of 17.6 million metric tons per year.
The company had planned to make a decision on a fourth train by the end of 2024, after signing an engineering, procurement and construction contract with Bechtel.
A total of five trains were proposed, which could increase the terminal’s production capacity to around 27 million tonnes per year.
Meanwhile, the Texas LNG project, which has a capacity of around 4 million tonnes per year, has also announced several commercial agreements in 2024 to support its goal of commercial sanction by the end of the year.
These developments underline the strategic importance of these projects for the USA, as it seeks to strengthen its position in the global LNG market.
However, regulatory uncertainties and legal challenges could influence developers’ ability to realize their ambitions.

Analysis of environmental and regulatory issues

The new environmental studies requested by FERC are intended to address concerns raised by the court regarding the analysis of environmental impacts.
The court criticized FERC for failing to issue additional environmental impact studies on environmental justice for each project, as well as for its assessment of CCS for the Rio Grande project.
In addition, the commission did not explain why it had chosen not to consider air quality data from a nearby monitor, which was also a point of contention.
FERC had originally approved the Texas LNG and Rio Grande LNG projects, as well as the Rio Bravo natural gas pipeline, in November 2019.
However, the court found flaws in the climate considerations and environmental justice analysis, leading to a remand of the approvals back to FERC without rescinding them.
The commission reauthorized the projects in April 2023, but legal challenges persist, further complicating the situation for developers.

Outlook for future LNG projects

LNG projects in the United States, particularly Rio Grande and Texas LNG, are at a critical crossroads.
Recent regulatory and judicial decisions highlight the tensions between economic development and environmental concerns.
As companies seek to meet the growing demand for LNG in international markets, they must also navigate an increasingly demanding regulatory environment.
The results of new environmental studies and future FERC decisions will determine the future of these projects.
Developers must not only comply with regulatory requirements, but also anticipate the reactions of environmental groups and local communities.
The ability of the United States to maintain its position in the global LNG market will largely depend on how these challenges are met.

First suspect linked to the Nord Stream pipeline explosions, a Ukrainian citizen challenged by Berlin opposes his judicial transfer from Italy.
Ukrainian drones targeted a nuclear power plant and a Russian oil terminal, increasing pressure on diplomatic talks as Moscow and Kyiv accuse each other of blocking any prospect of negotiation.
A Ukrainian national suspected of coordinating the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage has been apprehended in Italy, reigniting a judicial case with significant geopolitical implications across Europe.
Russia continues hydrocarbon deliveries to India and explores new outlets for liquefied natural gas, amid escalating trade tensions with the United States.
Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.

or

Go unlimited with our annual offer: €99 for the 1styear year, then € 199/year.