United States: LNG projects face regulatory and environmental challenges

Regulation of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects in the USA is evolving rapidly, with major implications for the Rio Grande and Texas LNG projects. Recent court rulings highlight the tensions between economic development and environmental concerns.

Share:

Rio Grande LNG, United States

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25€/month*

*billed annually at 99€/year for the first year then 149,00€/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2€/month*
then 14.90€ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The regulation of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects in the United States is in a state of flux, particularly with recent developments concerning the Rio Grande LNG and Texas LNG projects.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced that it will conduct a supplemental environmental assessment for these projects, following a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
This decision, issued on August 6, 2024, vacated and remanded the certificate authorizations for these facilities, highlighting deficiencies in the analysis of impacts on environmental justice and air quality.
LNG projects, aimed at increasing U.S. export capacity, face heightened regulatory risks.
FERC has indicated that new environmental studies, expected to be finalized by the end of July 2025, will examine the environmental impacts identified by the court.
This includes a reassessment of environmental justice impacts and a revised air quality analysis, as well as an evaluation of alternatives to the project, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems.

Impact of court rulings on LNG projects

Regulatory delays pose significant challenges for developers, particularly Rio Grande developer NextDecade, which has already begun construction on the first phase of its project.
The court ruled in favor of the environmental groups challenging the project approvals, claiming that FERC had not sufficiently considered environmental justice impacts.
In response, NextDecade asked FERC to withdraw its CCS proposal, which could have implications for the viability of the project.
FERC also clarified that the final environmental reports for both projects will be based on the agency’s previous analyses, including those from 2019.
These new studies are crucial in determining whether FERC will re-grant the necessary permits for the construction and operation of the LNG facilities.
The Rio Grande and Texas LNG projects, which aim to meet the growing demand for LNG in international markets, must navigate a complex and constantly evolving regulatory landscape.

Business developments and future prospects

NextDecade announced a final investment decision (FID) in July 2022 for the first phase of its project, which comprises three liquefaction trains with a production capacity of 17.6 million metric tons per year.
The company had planned to make a decision on a fourth train by the end of 2024, after signing an engineering, procurement and construction contract with Bechtel.
A total of five trains were proposed, which could increase the terminal’s production capacity to around 27 million tonnes per year.
Meanwhile, the Texas LNG project, which has a capacity of around 4 million tonnes per year, has also announced several commercial agreements in 2024 to support its goal of commercial sanction by the end of the year.
These developments underline the strategic importance of these projects for the USA, as it seeks to strengthen its position in the global LNG market.
However, regulatory uncertainties and legal challenges could influence developers’ ability to realize their ambitions.

Analysis of environmental and regulatory issues

The new environmental studies requested by FERC are intended to address concerns raised by the court regarding the analysis of environmental impacts.
The court criticized FERC for failing to issue additional environmental impact studies on environmental justice for each project, as well as for its assessment of CCS for the Rio Grande project.
In addition, the commission did not explain why it had chosen not to consider air quality data from a nearby monitor, which was also a point of contention.
FERC had originally approved the Texas LNG and Rio Grande LNG projects, as well as the Rio Bravo natural gas pipeline, in November 2019.
However, the court found flaws in the climate considerations and environmental justice analysis, leading to a remand of the approvals back to FERC without rescinding them.
The commission reauthorized the projects in April 2023, but legal challenges persist, further complicating the situation for developers.

Outlook for future LNG projects

LNG projects in the United States, particularly Rio Grande and Texas LNG, are at a critical crossroads.
Recent regulatory and judicial decisions highlight the tensions between economic development and environmental concerns.
As companies seek to meet the growing demand for LNG in international markets, they must also navigate an increasingly demanding regulatory environment.
The results of new environmental studies and future FERC decisions will determine the future of these projects.
Developers must not only comply with regulatory requirements, but also anticipate the reactions of environmental groups and local communities.
The ability of the United States to maintain its position in the global LNG market will largely depend on how these challenges are met.

Global South Utilities is investing $1 billion in new solar, wind and storage projects to strengthen Yemen's energy capacity and expand its regional influence.
British International Investment and FirstRand partner to finance the decarbonisation of African companies through a facility focused on supporting high-emission sectors.
Budapest moves to secure Serbian oil supply, threatened by Croatia’s suspension of crude flows following US sanctions on the Russian-controlled NIS refinery.
Moscow says it wants to increase oil and liquefied natural gas exports to Beijing, while consolidating bilateral cooperation amid US sanctions targeting Russian producers.
The European Investment Bank is mobilising €2bn in financing backed by the European Commission for energy projects in Africa, with a strategic objective rooted in the European Union’s energy diplomacy.
Russia faces a structural decline in energy revenues as strengthened sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil disrupt trade flows and deepen the federal budget deficit.
Washington imposes new sanctions targeting vessels, shipowners and intermediaries in Asia, increasing the regulatory risk of Iranian oil trade and redefining maritime compliance in the region.
OFAC’s licence for Paks II circumvents sanctions on Rosatom in exchange for US technological involvement, reshaping the balance of interests between Moscow, Budapest and Washington.
Finland, Estonia, Hungary and Czechia are multiplying bilateral initiatives in Africa to capture strategic energy and mining projects under the European Global Gateway programme.
The Brazilian president calls for a voluntary and non-binding energy transition during COP30 in Belém, avoiding direct confrontation with oil-producing countries.
The region attracted only a small share of global capital allocated to renewables in 2024, despite high energy needs and ambitious development goals, according to a report published in November.
The United States approves South Korea’s development of civilian uranium enrichment capabilities and supports a nuclear-powered submarine project, expanding a strategic partnership already linked to a major trade agreement.
The EU member states agree to prioritise a loan mechanism backed by immobilised Russian assets to finance aid to Ukraine, reducing national budgetary impact while ensuring enhanced funding capacity.
The Canadian government commits $56 billion to a new wave of infrastructure projects aimed at expanding energy corridors, accelerating critical mineral extraction and reinforcing strategic capacity.
Berlin strengthens its cooperation with Abuja through funding aimed at supporting Nigeria’s energy diversification and consolidating its renewable infrastructure.
COP30 begins in Belém under uncertainty, as countries fail to agree on key discussion topics, highlighting deep divisions over climate finance and the global energy transition.
The United States secures a tungsten joint venture in Kazakhstan and mining protocols in Uzbekistan, with financing envisaged from the Export-Import Bank of the United States and shipment routed via the Trans-Caspian corridor.
The United States grants Hungary a one-year waiver on sanctions targeting Russian oil, in return for a commitment to purchase US liquefied natural gas worth $600mn.
Meeting in Canada, G7 energy ministers unveiled a series of projects aimed at securing supply chains for critical minerals, in response to China’s restrictions on rare earth exports.
Donald Trump announces an immediate reduction in tariffs on Chinese fentanyl-related imports from 20% to 10%, potentially impacting energy flows between Washington and Beijing.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25€/month*

*billed annually at 99€/year for the first year then 149,00€/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2€/month*
then 14.90€ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.