United States: LNG projects face regulatory and environmental challenges

Regulation of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects in the USA is evolving rapidly, with major implications for the Rio Grande and Texas LNG projects. Recent court rulings highlight the tensions between economic development and environmental concerns.

Share:

Rio Grande LNG, United States

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

7-Day Pass

Up to 50 articles accessible for 7 days, with no automatic renewal

3 $/week*

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles/month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 30,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The regulation of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects in the United States is in a state of flux, particularly with recent developments concerning the Rio Grande LNG and Texas LNG projects.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced that it will conduct a supplemental environmental assessment for these projects, following a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
This decision, issued on August 6, 2024, vacated and remanded the certificate authorizations for these facilities, highlighting deficiencies in the analysis of impacts on environmental justice and air quality.
LNG projects, aimed at increasing U.S. export capacity, face heightened regulatory risks.
FERC has indicated that new environmental studies, expected to be finalized by the end of July 2025, will examine the environmental impacts identified by the court.
This includes a reassessment of environmental justice impacts and a revised air quality analysis, as well as an evaluation of alternatives to the project, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems.

Impact of court rulings on LNG projects

Regulatory delays pose significant challenges for developers, particularly Rio Grande developer NextDecade, which has already begun construction on the first phase of its project.
The court ruled in favor of the environmental groups challenging the project approvals, claiming that FERC had not sufficiently considered environmental justice impacts.
In response, NextDecade asked FERC to withdraw its CCS proposal, which could have implications for the viability of the project.
FERC also clarified that the final environmental reports for both projects will be based on the agency’s previous analyses, including those from 2019.
These new studies are crucial in determining whether FERC will re-grant the necessary permits for the construction and operation of the LNG facilities.
The Rio Grande and Texas LNG projects, which aim to meet the growing demand for LNG in international markets, must navigate a complex and constantly evolving regulatory landscape.

Business developments and future prospects

NextDecade announced a final investment decision (FID) in July 2022 for the first phase of its project, which comprises three liquefaction trains with a production capacity of 17.6 million metric tons per year.
The company had planned to make a decision on a fourth train by the end of 2024, after signing an engineering, procurement and construction contract with Bechtel.
A total of five trains were proposed, which could increase the terminal’s production capacity to around 27 million tonnes per year.
Meanwhile, the Texas LNG project, which has a capacity of around 4 million tonnes per year, has also announced several commercial agreements in 2024 to support its goal of commercial sanction by the end of the year.
These developments underline the strategic importance of these projects for the USA, as it seeks to strengthen its position in the global LNG market.
However, regulatory uncertainties and legal challenges could influence developers’ ability to realize their ambitions.

Analysis of environmental and regulatory issues

The new environmental studies requested by FERC are intended to address concerns raised by the court regarding the analysis of environmental impacts.
The court criticized FERC for failing to issue additional environmental impact studies on environmental justice for each project, as well as for its assessment of CCS for the Rio Grande project.
In addition, the commission did not explain why it had chosen not to consider air quality data from a nearby monitor, which was also a point of contention.
FERC had originally approved the Texas LNG and Rio Grande LNG projects, as well as the Rio Bravo natural gas pipeline, in November 2019.
However, the court found flaws in the climate considerations and environmental justice analysis, leading to a remand of the approvals back to FERC without rescinding them.
The commission reauthorized the projects in April 2023, but legal challenges persist, further complicating the situation for developers.

Outlook for future LNG projects

LNG projects in the United States, particularly Rio Grande and Texas LNG, are at a critical crossroads.
Recent regulatory and judicial decisions highlight the tensions between economic development and environmental concerns.
As companies seek to meet the growing demand for LNG in international markets, they must also navigate an increasingly demanding regulatory environment.
The results of new environmental studies and future FERC decisions will determine the future of these projects.
Developers must not only comply with regulatory requirements, but also anticipate the reactions of environmental groups and local communities.
The ability of the United States to maintain its position in the global LNG market will largely depend on how these challenges are met.

The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.
Athens and Tripoli engage in a negotiation process to define their exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean, amid geopolitical tensions and underwater energy stakes.
European powers demand concrete steps from Tehran on nuclear issue or United Nations sanctions will be reinstated, as IAEA inspections remain blocked and tensions with Washington persist.
Brussels confirms its target to end all Russian energy imports by 2028, despite growing diplomatic pressure from Washington amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump threatens to escalate US sanctions against Russia, but only if NATO member states stop all Russian oil imports, which remain active via certain pipelines.
The two countries agreed to develop infrastructure dedicated to liquefied natural gas to strengthen Europe's energy security and boost transatlantic trade.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.

All the latest energy news, all the time

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

7 DAY PASS

Up to 50 items can be consulted for 7 days,
without automatic renewal

3$/week*

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.