An uncertain future for the Siberian Force 2 pipeline

An in-depth analysis of energy cooperation between Russia and China, in particular the Siberian Force 2 pipeline project, and its economic and energy implications.

Share:

Gazoduc Siberie 2

An uncertain future for the Siberian Force 2 pipeline. Yet Vladimir Putin’s visit to China has generated enthusiasm and optimism about energy cooperation between Russia and China. The Russian president praised the “unprecedented” level of partnership and strategic cooperation between the two countries, particularly in the energy field. However, despite discussions and promises, a final agreement on the gigantic Siberian Force 2 gas pipeline project is still pending.

Economic and energy issues

Since losing the European market to sanctions and the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines, Russia has been actively seeking partnerships in Asia to compensate for its losses. China, as one of the world’s largest economies, has become a key player in this quest. Yet despite diplomatic visits and talks, no final agreement has been reached on Siberian Force 2, a crucial project for Russia.

Obstacles to reaching agreement

Observers note that several points of contention persist, notably the question of the price of Russian gas. Russia is increasingly dependent on Chinese demand, which puts Beijing in a strong negotiating position. Although gas deliveries via the Siberian Force 1 pipeline were up “46.6%” on the previous year, they did not compensate for the loss of the European market. These volumes represent just over half of previous exports to Europe via Nord Stream 1, which has been out of service due to sabotage.

Global Implications

Ultimately, the future of energy cooperation between Russia and China remains uncertain. The economic and energy stakes are high, but persistent obstacles stand in the way of an agreement on the Siberian Force 2 project. The outcome of these negotiations will have a significant impact on both countries and the global energy landscape.

Russia-China energy cooperation has reached new heights, but challenges remain. The two nations continue to negotiate, seeking common ground on crucial issues such as the price of Russian gas. The outcome of these negotiations will have a considerable impact on the economies and energy sectors of both countries, as well as on the international community as a whole. It is essential to keep a close eye on the development of this energy cooperation, as it will continue to shape the world’s energy future.

Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lends €400 million to JSC Energocom to diversify Moldova's gas and electricity supply, historically dependent on Russian imports via Ukraine.
BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.
The European Commission is launching an alliance with member states and industrial players to secure the supply of critical chemicals, amid growing competition from the United States and China.
Trade between Russia and Saudi Arabia grew by over 60% in 2024 to surpass USD 3.8 billion, according to Russian Minister of Industry and Trade Anton Alikhanov, who outlined new avenues for industrial cooperation.
Meeting in Rio, BRICS nations urge global energy market stability, openly condemning Western sanctions and tariff mechanisms in a tense economic and geopolitical context.
Despite strong ties, Iran's dependence on oil revenues limits its ability to secure substantial strategic support from Russia and China amid current international and regional crises, according to several experts.