Ukraine claims to have targeted the largest oil terminal in Crimea

The Ukrainian army claims to have struck the main oil terminal in Crimea, causing a fire. This attack is part of a series of actions aimed at disrupting the logistics of Russian forces controlling part of Ukraine.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

The Ukrainian army announced that it had successfully carried out a strike against the largest oil terminal in Crimea, a peninsula annexed by Russia in 2014. This operation caused a major fire, according to Russian authorities, although they have not confirmed the origin of the attack.

Since the beginning of its invasion in February 2022, Ukraine has intensified its attacks on Russian energy infrastructures to weaken the logistics of Moscow’s forces. These actions specifically target strategic sites supporting Russia’s war effort on Ukrainian territory.

A strategic strike on Crimea

The Ukrainian army’s general staff stated that the strike was carried out using missiles, specifically targeting a maritime oil terminal located in Feodosiya. This site, designated as the largest in Crimea in terms of the volume of oil products handled, primarily served the Russian army in the region. The fire resulting from the attack was widely visible, with videos showing large columns of black smoke rising into the sky.

This operation marks a tactical shift for Ukraine, which had previously relied mainly on combat drones to carry out its attacks. The switch to using long-range missiles underscores a strategic adaptation in response to logistical challenges and delays in receiving Western armaments.

Russian reactions and local consequences

Russian occupation authorities in Crimea acknowledged a fire at an oil depot in Feodosiya but did not attribute the incident to a Ukrainian attack. They also stated that no casualties were reported as a result of the fire. Nevertheless, local disruptions are notable, with part of the city experiencing power outages and suburban train services being suspended.

These recurring attacks on Russian energy infrastructures have significant repercussions on the daily lives of residents in the region, increasing tensions and further complicating the humanitarian situation in Crimea and conflict zones in Ukraine.

An energy war context

Since the beginning of the invasion, Russia has carried out several campaigns targeting Ukraine’s energy network, leaving millions of people without electricity. These attacks have a devastating impact on civilian and military infrastructures, disrupting daily activities and weakening Ukraine’s ability to resist.

On the night from Sunday to Monday, a new attack was launched against Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, using first explosive drones, followed by Kinjal ballistic missiles. Although the Ukrainian air defense shot down the projectiles, missile fragments fell in several districts, causing a quick fire but no casualties, according to the city authorities.

An intensification of military operations

Ukraine’s increased use of long-range missiles reflects a strategy aimed at maximizing the impact of strikes while bypassing limitations imposed by delays in Western arms deliveries. This tactical evolution could indicate a continuous adaptation of Ukrainian forces in response to the prolonged Russian offensive.

Ukrainian authorities have expressed frustration with delays in receiving missiles, which have so far limited the effectiveness of military operations. Despite these challenges, Ukraine persists in its efforts to weaken the Russian military position by targeting key infrastructures.

International and energy implications

These attacks on energy infrastructures have implications beyond the immediate conflict, affecting international energy markets and geopolitical relations. The destruction of oil terminals and fuel depots complicates energy supplies, exacerbating tensions already present in global markets.

International reactions to these strikes vary, with some countries supporting Ukraine’s actions as a measure of self-defense, while others call for peace talks to avoid further escalation of the conflict.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.
Brazil’s Cop 30 presidency aims to leverage the Dubai commitments to mobilise public and private actors despite ongoing deadlock in international negotiations.
During a meeting in Beijing, Vladimir Putin called on Slovakia to suspend its energy deliveries to Ukraine, citing Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy infrastructure as justification.
Vladimir Putin and Robert Fico met in China to address the war in Ukraine, regional security and energy relations between Russia and Slovakia.
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico plans to meet Vladimir Putin in Beijing before receiving Volodymyr Zelensky in Bratislava, marking a diplomatic shift in his relations with Moscow and Kyiv.
The three European powers activate the UN sanctions mechanism against Iran, increasing pressure on the country's oil exports as Tehran maintains high production despite Western measures.
Iran once again authorises the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect its nuclear sites, following a suspension triggered by a dispute over responsibility for Israeli strikes.
First suspect linked to the Nord Stream pipeline explosions, a Ukrainian citizen challenged by Berlin opposes his judicial transfer from Italy.
Ukrainian drones targeted a nuclear power plant and a Russian oil terminal, increasing pressure on diplomatic talks as Moscow and Kyiv accuse each other of blocking any prospect of negotiation.
A Ukrainian national suspected of coordinating the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage has been apprehended in Italy, reigniting a judicial case with significant geopolitical implications across Europe.
Russia continues hydrocarbon deliveries to India and explores new outlets for liquefied natural gas, amid escalating trade tensions with the United States.
Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.