Ukraine claims to have targeted the largest oil terminal in Crimea

The Ukrainian army claims to have struck the main oil terminal in Crimea, causing a fire. This attack is part of a series of actions aimed at disrupting the logistics of Russian forces controlling part of Ukraine.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

7-Day Pass

Up to 50 articles accessible for 7 days, with no automatic renewal

3 $/week*

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles/month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 30,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The Ukrainian army announced that it had successfully carried out a strike against the largest oil terminal in Crimea, a peninsula annexed by Russia in 2014. This operation caused a major fire, according to Russian authorities, although they have not confirmed the origin of the attack.

Since the beginning of its invasion in February 2022, Ukraine has intensified its attacks on Russian energy infrastructures to weaken the logistics of Moscow’s forces. These actions specifically target strategic sites supporting Russia’s war effort on Ukrainian territory.

A strategic strike on Crimea

The Ukrainian army’s general staff stated that the strike was carried out using missiles, specifically targeting a maritime oil terminal located in Feodosiya. This site, designated as the largest in Crimea in terms of the volume of oil products handled, primarily served the Russian army in the region. The fire resulting from the attack was widely visible, with videos showing large columns of black smoke rising into the sky.

This operation marks a tactical shift for Ukraine, which had previously relied mainly on combat drones to carry out its attacks. The switch to using long-range missiles underscores a strategic adaptation in response to logistical challenges and delays in receiving Western armaments.

Russian reactions and local consequences

Russian occupation authorities in Crimea acknowledged a fire at an oil depot in Feodosiya but did not attribute the incident to a Ukrainian attack. They also stated that no casualties were reported as a result of the fire. Nevertheless, local disruptions are notable, with part of the city experiencing power outages and suburban train services being suspended.

These recurring attacks on Russian energy infrastructures have significant repercussions on the daily lives of residents in the region, increasing tensions and further complicating the humanitarian situation in Crimea and conflict zones in Ukraine.

An energy war context

Since the beginning of the invasion, Russia has carried out several campaigns targeting Ukraine’s energy network, leaving millions of people without electricity. These attacks have a devastating impact on civilian and military infrastructures, disrupting daily activities and weakening Ukraine’s ability to resist.

On the night from Sunday to Monday, a new attack was launched against Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, using first explosive drones, followed by Kinjal ballistic missiles. Although the Ukrainian air defense shot down the projectiles, missile fragments fell in several districts, causing a quick fire but no casualties, according to the city authorities.

An intensification of military operations

Ukraine’s increased use of long-range missiles reflects a strategy aimed at maximizing the impact of strikes while bypassing limitations imposed by delays in Western arms deliveries. This tactical evolution could indicate a continuous adaptation of Ukrainian forces in response to the prolonged Russian offensive.

Ukrainian authorities have expressed frustration with delays in receiving missiles, which have so far limited the effectiveness of military operations. Despite these challenges, Ukraine persists in its efforts to weaken the Russian military position by targeting key infrastructures.

International and energy implications

These attacks on energy infrastructures have implications beyond the immediate conflict, affecting international energy markets and geopolitical relations. The destruction of oil terminals and fuel depots complicates energy supplies, exacerbating tensions already present in global markets.

International reactions to these strikes vary, with some countries supporting Ukraine’s actions as a measure of self-defense, while others call for peace talks to avoid further escalation of the conflict.

The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.
Athens and Tripoli engage in a negotiation process to define their exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean, amid geopolitical tensions and underwater energy stakes.
European powers demand concrete steps from Tehran on nuclear issue or United Nations sanctions will be reinstated, as IAEA inspections remain blocked and tensions with Washington persist.
Brussels confirms its target to end all Russian energy imports by 2028, despite growing diplomatic pressure from Washington amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump threatens to escalate US sanctions against Russia, but only if NATO member states stop all Russian oil imports, which remain active via certain pipelines.
The two countries agreed to develop infrastructure dedicated to liquefied natural gas to strengthen Europe's energy security and boost transatlantic trade.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.

All the latest energy news, all the time

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

7 DAY PASS

Up to 50 items can be consulted for 7 days,
without automatic renewal

3$/week*

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.