Ukraine claims to have targeted the largest oil terminal in Crimea

The Ukrainian army claims to have struck the main oil terminal in Crimea, causing a fire. This attack is part of a series of actions aimed at disrupting the logistics of Russian forces controlling part of Ukraine.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The Ukrainian army announced that it had successfully carried out a strike against the largest oil terminal in Crimea, a peninsula annexed by Russia in 2014. This operation caused a major fire, according to Russian authorities, although they have not confirmed the origin of the attack.

Since the beginning of its invasion in February 2022, Ukraine has intensified its attacks on Russian energy infrastructures to weaken the logistics of Moscow’s forces. These actions specifically target strategic sites supporting Russia’s war effort on Ukrainian territory.

A strategic strike on Crimea

The Ukrainian army’s general staff stated that the strike was carried out using missiles, specifically targeting a maritime oil terminal located in Feodosiya. This site, designated as the largest in Crimea in terms of the volume of oil products handled, primarily served the Russian army in the region. The fire resulting from the attack was widely visible, with videos showing large columns of black smoke rising into the sky.

This operation marks a tactical shift for Ukraine, which had previously relied mainly on combat drones to carry out its attacks. The switch to using long-range missiles underscores a strategic adaptation in response to logistical challenges and delays in receiving Western armaments.

Russian reactions and local consequences

Russian occupation authorities in Crimea acknowledged a fire at an oil depot in Feodosiya but did not attribute the incident to a Ukrainian attack. They also stated that no casualties were reported as a result of the fire. Nevertheless, local disruptions are notable, with part of the city experiencing power outages and suburban train services being suspended.

These recurring attacks on Russian energy infrastructures have significant repercussions on the daily lives of residents in the region, increasing tensions and further complicating the humanitarian situation in Crimea and conflict zones in Ukraine.

An energy war context

Since the beginning of the invasion, Russia has carried out several campaigns targeting Ukraine’s energy network, leaving millions of people without electricity. These attacks have a devastating impact on civilian and military infrastructures, disrupting daily activities and weakening Ukraine’s ability to resist.

On the night from Sunday to Monday, a new attack was launched against Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, using first explosive drones, followed by Kinjal ballistic missiles. Although the Ukrainian air defense shot down the projectiles, missile fragments fell in several districts, causing a quick fire but no casualties, according to the city authorities.

An intensification of military operations

Ukraine’s increased use of long-range missiles reflects a strategy aimed at maximizing the impact of strikes while bypassing limitations imposed by delays in Western arms deliveries. This tactical evolution could indicate a continuous adaptation of Ukrainian forces in response to the prolonged Russian offensive.

Ukrainian authorities have expressed frustration with delays in receiving missiles, which have so far limited the effectiveness of military operations. Despite these challenges, Ukraine persists in its efforts to weaken the Russian military position by targeting key infrastructures.

International and energy implications

These attacks on energy infrastructures have implications beyond the immediate conflict, affecting international energy markets and geopolitical relations. The destruction of oil terminals and fuel depots complicates energy supplies, exacerbating tensions already present in global markets.

International reactions to these strikes vary, with some countries supporting Ukraine’s actions as a measure of self-defense, while others call for peace talks to avoid further escalation of the conflict.

The United States strengthens its energy presence in the Eastern Mediterranean by consolidating a gas corridor through Greece to Central Europe, to the detriment of Russian flows and Chinese logistical influence over the Port of Piraeus.
Paris and Beijing agree to create a bilateral climate task force focused on nuclear technologies, renewable energy and maritime sectors, amid escalating trade tensions between China and the European Union.
Ankara plans to invest in US gas production to secure LNG supply and become a key supplier to Southern Europe, according to the Turkish Energy Minister.
Three Russian tankers targeted off the Turkish coast have reignited Ankara’s concerns about oil and gas supply security in the Black Sea and the vulnerability of its subsea infrastructure.
Bucharest authorises an exceptional takeover of Lukoil’s local assets to avoid a supply shock while complying with international sanctions. Three buyers are already in advanced talks.
European governments want to add review and safeguard mechanisms to the trade deal with Washington to prevent a potential surge of US imports from disrupting their industrial base.
The Khor Mor gas field, operated by Pearl Petroleum, was hit by an armed drone, halting production and causing power outages affecting 80% of Kurdistan’s electricity capacity.
Global South Utilities is investing $1 billion in new solar, wind and storage projects to strengthen Yemen's energy capacity and expand its regional influence.
British International Investment and FirstRand partner to finance the decarbonisation of African companies through a facility focused on supporting high-emission sectors.
Budapest moves to secure Serbian oil supply, threatened by Croatia’s suspension of crude flows following US sanctions on the Russian-controlled NIS refinery.
Moscow says it wants to increase oil and liquefied natural gas exports to Beijing, while consolidating bilateral cooperation amid US sanctions targeting Russian producers.
The European Investment Bank is mobilising €2bn in financing backed by the European Commission for energy projects in Africa, with a strategic objective rooted in the European Union’s energy diplomacy.
Russia faces a structural decline in energy revenues as strengthened sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil disrupt trade flows and deepen the federal budget deficit.
Washington imposes new sanctions targeting vessels, shipowners and intermediaries in Asia, increasing the regulatory risk of Iranian oil trade and redefining maritime compliance in the region.
OFAC’s licence for Paks II circumvents sanctions on Rosatom in exchange for US technological involvement, reshaping the balance of interests between Moscow, Budapest and Washington.
Finland, Estonia, Hungary and Czechia are multiplying bilateral initiatives in Africa to capture strategic energy and mining projects under the European Global Gateway programme.
The Brazilian president calls for a voluntary and non-binding energy transition during COP30 in Belém, avoiding direct confrontation with oil-producing countries.
The region attracted only a small share of global capital allocated to renewables in 2024, despite high energy needs and ambitious development goals, according to a report published in November.
The United States approves South Korea’s development of civilian uranium enrichment capabilities and supports a nuclear-powered submarine project, expanding a strategic partnership already linked to a major trade agreement.
The EU member states agree to prioritise a loan mechanism backed by immobilised Russian assets to finance aid to Ukraine, reducing national budgetary impact while ensuring enhanced funding capacity.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.