Ukraine claims to have targeted the largest oil terminal in Crimea

The Ukrainian army claims to have struck the main oil terminal in Crimea, causing a fire. This attack is part of a series of actions aimed at disrupting the logistics of Russian forces controlling part of Ukraine.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The Ukrainian army announced that it had successfully carried out a strike against the largest oil terminal in Crimea, a peninsula annexed by Russia in 2014. This operation caused a major fire, according to Russian authorities, although they have not confirmed the origin of the attack.

Since the beginning of its invasion in February 2022, Ukraine has intensified its attacks on Russian energy infrastructures to weaken the logistics of Moscow’s forces. These actions specifically target strategic sites supporting Russia’s war effort on Ukrainian territory.

A strategic strike on Crimea

The Ukrainian army’s general staff stated that the strike was carried out using missiles, specifically targeting a maritime oil terminal located in Feodosiya. This site, designated as the largest in Crimea in terms of the volume of oil products handled, primarily served the Russian army in the region. The fire resulting from the attack was widely visible, with videos showing large columns of black smoke rising into the sky.

This operation marks a tactical shift for Ukraine, which had previously relied mainly on combat drones to carry out its attacks. The switch to using long-range missiles underscores a strategic adaptation in response to logistical challenges and delays in receiving Western armaments.

Russian reactions and local consequences

Russian occupation authorities in Crimea acknowledged a fire at an oil depot in Feodosiya but did not attribute the incident to a Ukrainian attack. They also stated that no casualties were reported as a result of the fire. Nevertheless, local disruptions are notable, with part of the city experiencing power outages and suburban train services being suspended.

These recurring attacks on Russian energy infrastructures have significant repercussions on the daily lives of residents in the region, increasing tensions and further complicating the humanitarian situation in Crimea and conflict zones in Ukraine.

An energy war context

Since the beginning of the invasion, Russia has carried out several campaigns targeting Ukraine’s energy network, leaving millions of people without electricity. These attacks have a devastating impact on civilian and military infrastructures, disrupting daily activities and weakening Ukraine’s ability to resist.

On the night from Sunday to Monday, a new attack was launched against Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, using first explosive drones, followed by Kinjal ballistic missiles. Although the Ukrainian air defense shot down the projectiles, missile fragments fell in several districts, causing a quick fire but no casualties, according to the city authorities.

An intensification of military operations

Ukraine’s increased use of long-range missiles reflects a strategy aimed at maximizing the impact of strikes while bypassing limitations imposed by delays in Western arms deliveries. This tactical evolution could indicate a continuous adaptation of Ukrainian forces in response to the prolonged Russian offensive.

Ukrainian authorities have expressed frustration with delays in receiving missiles, which have so far limited the effectiveness of military operations. Despite these challenges, Ukraine persists in its efforts to weaken the Russian military position by targeting key infrastructures.

International and energy implications

These attacks on energy infrastructures have implications beyond the immediate conflict, affecting international energy markets and geopolitical relations. The destruction of oil terminals and fuel depots complicates energy supplies, exacerbating tensions already present in global markets.

International reactions to these strikes vary, with some countries supporting Ukraine’s actions as a measure of self-defense, while others call for peace talks to avoid further escalation of the conflict.

Donald Trump announces an immediate reduction in tariffs on Chinese fentanyl-related imports from 20% to 10%, potentially impacting energy flows between Washington and Beijing.
Amman plans to launch tenders for 400 megawatts of solar, wind and storage projects, as part of a strengthened bilateral energy cooperation with Germany.
An emergency meeting led by the European Commission gathers key sectors affected by China's export restrictions on rare earths, ahead of a briefing at the European Parliament.
Manila plans to expand gas and renewable energy production to meet a 6.6% increase in electricity demand over the next two years.
Ottawa and London increased bilateral exchanges to structure strategic cooperation on nuclear energy and critical minerals supply chains, as part of Canada’s G7 presidency.
Donald Trump says he secured Narendra Modi’s commitment to end Russian oil imports, adding political pressure to India-Russia trade relations.
Under intense diplomatic pressure from Washington, member states of the International Maritime Organization agreed to postpone by one year the adoption of a carbon pricing mechanism for global maritime transport.
Washington confirms it has mandated the CIA to carry out secret actions against Nicolas Maduro’s government, escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela amid geostrategic and energy stakes.
Two European Parliament committees propose to advance the full halt of Russian hydrocarbon imports to 2026 and 2027, including oil, gas, and LNG, strengthening the European Union’s geopolitical position.
The COP30 conference hosted in the Amazon by Brazil faces low participation from global leaders, amid geopolitical tensions and major logistical challenges.
The United States has granted Trinidad and Tobago a special licence to resume negotiations with Venezuela on the Dragon gas field, partially lifting restrictions imposed on the Venezuelan energy sector.
Ambassadors of European Union member states have approved the transmission of a legislative proposal to phase out Russian fossil fuel imports by January 2028 to the Council of Ministers.
The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.