UK steps up pressure on Russian “Ghost Fleet

London imposes new sanctions on ten Russian vessels operating under flags of convenience to circumvent Western oil restrictions, intensifying economic pressure on Moscow.

Share:

Illustration flotte fantôme russe

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The UK has announced a tightening of sanctions against a series of Russian vessels operating under foreign flags.
These ships, dubbed the “phantom fleet”, are used to transport oil and circumvent restrictions imposed by G7 countries and their allies since the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
According to the UK Foreign Office, these sanctions prohibit ten of these vessels from accessing British ports and registering in the UK shipping register.
Previous sanctions having failed to deter Moscow from using these methods, London is stepping up its efforts to cut off access to world energy markets, the keystone of Russian state financing.
Oil exports will account for around 25% of Russia’s budget in 2023, and these new measures are designed to further restrict this vital source of revenue.

Leverage effect on Russian oil trade

The announcement comes at the same time as talks between British Foreign Secretary David Lammy and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Ukraine.
The aim of these meetings is to coordinate a coherent Western response to Russian bypass strategies.
The aim is to tighten the regulatory net around Russian oil exports and discourage the use of uninsured or flag-of-convenience vessels.
The new restrictions imposed by London mark the third round of measures against such vessels.
Three of the ten ships targeted have been identified as having carried over $5 billion worth of Russian oil since the start of the conflict.
The British government accuses these ships of allowing Moscow to continue its unrestricted oil sales, thereby helping to finance military operations in Ukraine.

Consequences for Russian Energy Markets and Strategies

The repercussions of sanctions on world energy markets could be significant.
By restricting Russia’s ability to export oil, London and its allies seek to influence not only trade flows, but also oil prices on world markets.
Although the immediate effects may be limited by Russia’s efforts to diversify its trade routes and partners, these actions create increased uncertainty for players in the energy sector.
In response, Moscow may redouble its efforts to forge alliances with non-aligned countries, or seek to circumvent sanctions through barter mechanisms or trade in local currencies.
Maritime operators, as well as insurers and reinsurers in the sector, could also face increased compliance and political risk challenges.

Implications for Western Energy Policies

These new measures are part of a wider strategy by the G7 countries to limit Russia’s energy revenues while minimizing disruption to their own economies.
The coordination between London and Washington, symbolized by the joint visit of Lammy and Blinken to Ukraine, shows a clear desire to maintain continuous pressure on Moscow.
British sanctions add a new layer of complexity for operators in the energy supply chain.
In addition to shipping restrictions, further regulations could be envisaged, potentially affecting the banking sector, financial services, and even third-party players who indirectly facilitate the Russian oil trade.

Towards tighter energy penalties

Market players must anticipate new measures targeting not only the “phantom fleet”, but also other key sectors of the Russian economy.
The strategy of gradual sanctions is designed to increase Russia’s operating costs, thereby reducing its ability to finance its war effort.
Energy sector experts should keep a close eye on future developments, as the sanctions dynamic remains fluid and likely to harden depending on the situation in Ukraine.
The consequences for oil markets, shipping logistics and international relations underline the importance of heightened vigilance and rapid adaptation to the new realities of global trade in a context of prolonged conflict.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences