Trump imposes 25% plus mystery penalties on India from August

Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90€/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90€/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 €/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99€/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 €/year from the second year.

The Trump administration announced on Wednesday an unprecedented tariff framework against India, effective from August 1. This measure combines a base tariff of 25% on all Indian imports with an additional penalty, the amount of which remains deliberately undisclosed. The $87.4bn worth of Indian exports to the United States are directly impacted by this arrangement, marking an escalation in bilateral trade tensions.

Complex legal mechanism and areas of uncertainty
The “tariff plus penalty” structure relies on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law granting the President emergency economic powers. This legal basis is already the subject of challenges before federal courts regarding other tariff measures by the administration. The lack of clarity on how the additional penalty will be calculated creates significant uncertainty for economic operators. Legal experts are questioning the legality of a sanction whose parameters are not publicly defined.

US importers are unable to calculate their future costs. Three main scenarios have emerged from analysis: an additional fixed penalty of 5 to 10%, a progressive system based on each Indian company’s volume of Russian imports, or a hybrid formula considering global commercial relations with Moscow. Kevin Hassett, Director of the National Economic Council, indicated that details would be announced later by Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

Critical sectors under immediate pressure
Ferroalloys represent a major strategic issue, with 75,000 metric tonnes imported for $108.1mn in 2024. These materials are essential inputs for the US steel industry. American steel producers rely on these Indian supplies to maintain their production lines. The pharmaceutical industry faces particular challenges, as India provides a substantial share of generic medicines consumed in the United States.

The electronics sector, representing $12bn to $14bn of Indian exports, could see its supply chains deeply disrupted. Textiles and garments, although accounting for a more modest $3bn volume, employ millions of workers in India. Jewellery and precious stones, with more than $10bn in exports, represent another vulnerable segment.

Implications for ongoing negotiations
This announcement comes after five rounds of unsuccessful negotiations between Washington and New Delhi. The discussions are stalling over fundamental points: US agricultural market access in India, particularly for genetically modified organisms, and the opening of India’s dairy sector. Indian Minister of Finance Nirmala Sitharaman called agriculture and dairy “red lines” in the negotiations.

Indian companies had anticipated tariff measures by accelerating shipments in early 2025, with a year-on-year increase of 30%, according to the Federation of Indian Export Organisations. The organisation estimates that India could lose at least $5bn annually if the higher tariffs remain in effect. The engineering, steel, and mineral sectors would be hit the hardest, according to their projections.

Tight timeline and strategic options
The 48-hour window before the tariffs come into force leaves little room for manoeuvre for negotiators. Indian authorities are considering several options: a symmetrical tariff response, a complaint to the World Trade Organization, or accelerated trade talks with the European Union and the United Kingdom. Bilateral trade between India and the United States reached around $129bn in 2024, with an Indian trade surplus of nearly $46bn.

The complexity of the tariff scheme could paradoxically provide a negotiating window. The lack of a clear definition of the additional penalty suggests an intention to maintain maximum pressure while retaining flexibility in the discussions. The coming hours will determine whether this strategy leads to a diplomatic breakthrough or to a prolonged commercial escalation between the two democracies.

Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.
Athens and Tripoli engage in a negotiation process to define their exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean, amid geopolitical tensions and underwater energy stakes.
European powers demand concrete steps from Tehran on nuclear issue or United Nations sanctions will be reinstated, as IAEA inspections remain blocked and tensions with Washington persist.
Brussels confirms its target to end all Russian energy imports by 2028, despite growing diplomatic pressure from Washington amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump threatens to escalate US sanctions against Russia, but only if NATO member states stop all Russian oil imports, which remain active via certain pipelines.
The two countries agreed to develop infrastructure dedicated to liquefied natural gas to strengthen Europe's energy security and boost transatlantic trade.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.
Brazil’s Cop 30 presidency aims to leverage the Dubai commitments to mobilise public and private actors despite ongoing deadlock in international negotiations.
Brasília has officially begun the process of joining the International Energy Agency, strengthening its strategic position on the global energy stage after years of close cooperation with the Paris-based organisation.
During a meeting in Beijing, Vladimir Putin called on Slovakia to suspend its energy deliveries to Ukraine, citing Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy infrastructure as justification.
Vladimir Putin and Robert Fico met in China to address the war in Ukraine, regional security and energy relations between Russia and Slovakia.
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico plans to meet Vladimir Putin in Beijing before receiving Volodymyr Zelensky in Bratislava, marking a diplomatic shift in his relations with Moscow and Kyiv.
The three European powers activate the UN sanctions mechanism against Iran, increasing pressure on the country's oil exports as Tehran maintains high production despite Western measures.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.

[wc_register_modal]