Trump imposes 25% plus mystery penalties on India from August

Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.

Share:

The Trump administration announced on Wednesday an unprecedented tariff framework against India, effective from August 1. This measure combines a base tariff of 25% on all Indian imports with an additional penalty, the amount of which remains deliberately undisclosed. The $87.4bn worth of Indian exports to the United States are directly impacted by this arrangement, marking an escalation in bilateral trade tensions.

Complex legal mechanism and areas of uncertainty
The “tariff plus penalty” structure relies on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law granting the President emergency economic powers. This legal basis is already the subject of challenges before federal courts regarding other tariff measures by the administration. The lack of clarity on how the additional penalty will be calculated creates significant uncertainty for economic operators. Legal experts are questioning the legality of a sanction whose parameters are not publicly defined.

US importers are unable to calculate their future costs. Three main scenarios have emerged from analysis: an additional fixed penalty of 5 to 10%, a progressive system based on each Indian company’s volume of Russian imports, or a hybrid formula considering global commercial relations with Moscow. Kevin Hassett, Director of the National Economic Council, indicated that details would be announced later by Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

Critical sectors under immediate pressure
Ferroalloys represent a major strategic issue, with 75,000 metric tonnes imported for $108.1mn in 2024. These materials are essential inputs for the US steel industry. American steel producers rely on these Indian supplies to maintain their production lines. The pharmaceutical industry faces particular challenges, as India provides a substantial share of generic medicines consumed in the United States.

The electronics sector, representing $12bn to $14bn of Indian exports, could see its supply chains deeply disrupted. Textiles and garments, although accounting for a more modest $3bn volume, employ millions of workers in India. Jewellery and precious stones, with more than $10bn in exports, represent another vulnerable segment.

Implications for ongoing negotiations
This announcement comes after five rounds of unsuccessful negotiations between Washington and New Delhi. The discussions are stalling over fundamental points: US agricultural market access in India, particularly for genetically modified organisms, and the opening of India’s dairy sector. Indian Minister of Finance Nirmala Sitharaman called agriculture and dairy “red lines” in the negotiations.

Indian companies had anticipated tariff measures by accelerating shipments in early 2025, with a year-on-year increase of 30%, according to the Federation of Indian Export Organisations. The organisation estimates that India could lose at least $5bn annually if the higher tariffs remain in effect. The engineering, steel, and mineral sectors would be hit the hardest, according to their projections.

Tight timeline and strategic options
The 48-hour window before the tariffs come into force leaves little room for manoeuvre for negotiators. Indian authorities are considering several options: a symmetrical tariff response, a complaint to the World Trade Organization, or accelerated trade talks with the European Union and the United Kingdom. Bilateral trade between India and the United States reached around $129bn in 2024, with an Indian trade surplus of nearly $46bn.

The complexity of the tariff scheme could paradoxically provide a negotiating window. The lack of a clear definition of the additional penalty suggests an intention to maintain maximum pressure while retaining flexibility in the discussions. The coming hours will determine whether this strategy leads to a diplomatic breakthrough or to a prolonged commercial escalation between the two democracies.

Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development lends €400 million to JSC Energocom to diversify Moldova's gas and electricity supply, historically dependent on Russian imports via Ukraine.
BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.
The European Commission is launching an alliance with member states and industrial players to secure the supply of critical chemicals, amid growing competition from the United States and China.
Trade between Russia and Saudi Arabia grew by over 60% in 2024 to surpass USD 3.8 billion, according to Russian Minister of Industry and Trade Anton Alikhanov, who outlined new avenues for industrial cooperation.
Meeting in Rio, BRICS nations urge global energy market stability, openly condemning Western sanctions and tariff mechanisms in a tense economic and geopolitical context.
Despite strong ties, Iran's dependence on oil revenues limits its ability to secure substantial strategic support from Russia and China amid current international and regional crises, according to several experts.
Egypt’s Electricity Minister engages in new talks with Envision Group, Windey, LONGi, China Energy, PowerChina, and ToNGWEI to boost local industry and attract investments in renewable energy.
The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz places Gulf producers under intense pressure, highlighting their diplomatic and logistical limitations as a blockage threatens 20 million daily barrels of hydrocarbons destined for global markets.
Budapest and Bratislava jointly reject the European Commission's proposal to ban Russian energy supplies, highlighting significant economic risks and a direct threat to their energy security, days ahead of a key meeting.