Trump imposes 25% plus mystery penalties on India from August

Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The Trump administration announced on Wednesday an unprecedented tariff framework against India, effective from August 1. This measure combines a base tariff of 25% on all Indian imports with an additional penalty, the amount of which remains deliberately undisclosed. The $87.4bn worth of Indian exports to the United States are directly impacted by this arrangement, marking an escalation in bilateral trade tensions.

Complex legal mechanism and areas of uncertainty
The “tariff plus penalty” structure relies on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law granting the President emergency economic powers. This legal basis is already the subject of challenges before federal courts regarding other tariff measures by the administration. The lack of clarity on how the additional penalty will be calculated creates significant uncertainty for economic operators. Legal experts are questioning the legality of a sanction whose parameters are not publicly defined.

US importers are unable to calculate their future costs. Three main scenarios have emerged from analysis: an additional fixed penalty of 5 to 10%, a progressive system based on each Indian company’s volume of Russian imports, or a hybrid formula considering global commercial relations with Moscow. Kevin Hassett, Director of the National Economic Council, indicated that details would be announced later by Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

Critical sectors under immediate pressure
Ferroalloys represent a major strategic issue, with 75,000 metric tonnes imported for $108.1mn in 2024. These materials are essential inputs for the US steel industry. American steel producers rely on these Indian supplies to maintain their production lines. The pharmaceutical industry faces particular challenges, as India provides a substantial share of generic medicines consumed in the United States.

The electronics sector, representing $12bn to $14bn of Indian exports, could see its supply chains deeply disrupted. Textiles and garments, although accounting for a more modest $3bn volume, employ millions of workers in India. Jewellery and precious stones, with more than $10bn in exports, represent another vulnerable segment.

Implications for ongoing negotiations
This announcement comes after five rounds of unsuccessful negotiations between Washington and New Delhi. The discussions are stalling over fundamental points: US agricultural market access in India, particularly for genetically modified organisms, and the opening of India’s dairy sector. Indian Minister of Finance Nirmala Sitharaman called agriculture and dairy “red lines” in the negotiations.

Indian companies had anticipated tariff measures by accelerating shipments in early 2025, with a year-on-year increase of 30%, according to the Federation of Indian Export Organisations. The organisation estimates that India could lose at least $5bn annually if the higher tariffs remain in effect. The engineering, steel, and mineral sectors would be hit the hardest, according to their projections.

Tight timeline and strategic options
The 48-hour window before the tariffs come into force leaves little room for manoeuvre for negotiators. Indian authorities are considering several options: a symmetrical tariff response, a complaint to the World Trade Organization, or accelerated trade talks with the European Union and the United Kingdom. Bilateral trade between India and the United States reached around $129bn in 2024, with an Indian trade surplus of nearly $46bn.

The complexity of the tariff scheme could paradoxically provide a negotiating window. The lack of a clear definition of the additional penalty suggests an intention to maintain maximum pressure while retaining flexibility in the discussions. The coming hours will determine whether this strategy leads to a diplomatic breakthrough or to a prolonged commercial escalation between the two democracies.

Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
Consent Preferences