The Energy Crisis Costs 500 Billion Euros

The energy crisis continues and the measures to deal with it are multiplying. European governments allocated nearly 500 billion euros. The EU proposes a coordinated response to inequality.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

The energy crisis continues. Fears of an energy shortage are growing. Thus, EU governments are multiplying strategies to protect citizens and businesses from soaring prices. According to a study by Bruegel, they have affected some 500 billion euros.

The energy crisis is expensive

Gas and energy prices continue to soar. Thus, governments are putting in place many measures. These are designed to limit retail electricity prices. This can be done by reducing taxes on energy or by subsidizing consumers.

In this context of energy crisis, the 27 have allocated 314 billion euros. In Great Britain, the amount reaches 178 billion euros. To this amount, we must add the amount allocated to nationalizations, bailouts or even loans to energy companies. Thus, EU members spent 450 billion euros.

While these measures are meant to be temporary, the strengthening of state intervention is noteworthy. According to Bruegel, this intervention becomes “structural”.

In addition, the think tank warns. Simone Tagliapietra, member of Bruegel, explains:

“This situation is clearly not sustainable from a public finance perspective. Governments with greater fiscal flexibility will inevitably manage the energy crisis better by outperforming their neighbors for limited energy resources during the winter months.”

Uneven spending

In fact, spending to address the energy crisis varies across the EU. Thus, Germany, the largest economy in the European Union, spends the most. While its industrial production is declining, it is multiplying its attempts to save its companies.

Berlin then allocated 100 billion euros. By comparison, Italy spent 59 billion euros and Estonia set aside 200 million euros. In fact, Croatia, Greece, Italy and Latvia are spending more than 3% of their GDP to combat the energy crisis.

In response to this trend, the EU is proposing EU-wide measures. It is then a question of facing the energy crisis by superimposing a coordinated reaction to national measures.

A report by Rhodium Group anticipates stagnation in US emissions, a result of the political shift favouring fossil fuels since Donald Trump returned to office.
A sudden fault on the national grid cut electricity supply to several regions of Nigeria, reigniting concerns about the stability of the transmission system.
Re-elected president Irfaan Ali announces stricter production-sharing agreements to increase national economic returns.
Coal India issues tenders to develop 5 GW of renewable capacity, split between solar and wind, as part of its long-term energy strategy.
US utilities anticipate a rapid increase in high-intensity loads, targeting 147 GW of new capacity by 2035, with a strategic shift toward deregulated markets.
France opens a national consultation on RTE’s plan to invest €100 billion by 2040 to modernise the high-voltage electricity transmission grid.
Governor Gavin Newsom orders state agencies to fast-track clean energy projects to capture Inflation Reduction Act credits before deadlines expire.
Germany’s energy transition could cost up to €5.4tn ($6.3tn) by 2049, according to the main industry organisation, raising concerns over national competitiveness.
Facing blackouts imposed by the authorities, small businesses in Iran record mounting losses amid drought, fuel shortages and pressure on the national power grid.
Russian group T Plus plans to stabilise its electricity output at 57.6 TWh in 2025, despite a decline recorded in the first half of the year, according to Chief Executive Officer Pavel Snikkars.
In France, the Commission de régulation de l’énergie issues a clarification on ten statements shared over the summer, correcting several figures regarding tariffs, production and investments in the electricity sector.
A group of 85 researchers challenges the scientific validity of the climate report released by the US Department of Energy, citing partial methods and the absence of independent peer review.
Five energy infrastructure projects have been added to the list of cross-border renewable projects, making them eligible for financial support under the CEF Energy programme.
The Tanzanian government launches a national consultation to accelerate the rollout of compressed natural gas, mobilising public and private financing to secure energy supply and lower fuel costs.
The Kuwaiti government has invited three international consortia to submit bids for the first phase of the Al Khairan project, combining power generation and desalination.
Nigeria’s state-owned oil company abandons plans to sell the Port Harcourt refinery and confirms a maintenance programme despite high operating costs.
The publication of the Multiannual Energy Programme decree, awaited for two years, is compromised by internal political tensions, jeopardising strategic investments in nuclear and renewables.
The US Energy Information Administration reschedules or cancels several publications, affecting the availability of critical data for oil, gas and renewables markets.
Brazilian authorities have launched a large-scale operation targeting a money laundering system linked to the fuel sector, involving investment funds, fintechs, and more than 1,000 service stations across the country.
A national study by the Davies Group reveals widespread American support for the simultaneous development of both renewable and fossil energy sources, with strong approval for natural gas and solar energy.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.