The Development of Strategic Electric Interconnections

Electric interconnections have reshaped global energy systems, enabling cross-border cooperation and economic stability. Rooted in Oxford Energy Institute research, this piece highlights key agreements, technological milestones, and the diplomatic strategies driving these transformative infrastructures.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Electric interconnections have long been a cornerstone for ensuring the stability and reliability of many national grids. As early as the 1920s, some European countries began negotiations to link their infrastructures to share energy surpluses. Initial agreements, such as the one between Switzerland and France in 1924, paved the way for sustainable cross-border connections. Early projects, often limited by available technology, nevertheless set a precedent for international cooperation.

Early Initiatives and the Rise of Key Players

The creation of the Union for the Coordination of the Production and Transport of Electricity (UCPTE) in 1951 brought together several public and private companies determined to optimize energy exchanges. Government representatives from France, Italy, West Germany, and Switzerland supported this initiative, believing it would better distribute production loads. Facilities inaugurated in the 1950s included high-voltage lines designed to transport several hundred megawatts across mountainous terrains. This period saw the emergence of consortia involving public enterprises, promoting the rapid development of interconnected infrastructure.

In the early 1960s, the emergence of high-voltage direct current (HVDC) connections revolutionized electricity transportation over long distances. The project connecting France and the United Kingdom, launched in 1961 by the Central Electricity Generating Board and Électricité de France (EDF), marked a significant milestone of its time. This initiative benefited from the technical support of British and French engineering groups, which contributed to the gradual standardization of submarine cables. Subsequently, the reliability of these infrastructures encouraged other countries to consider similar connections, always with a focus on energy diplomacy.

Expansion into Multi-Continental Interconnections

The gradual opening of external markets led to projects linking Europe to North Africa, with the interconnection between Spain and Morocco being a prime example. In 1997, Red Eléctrica de España and Morocco’s National Office of Electricity validated an agreement for a 400 MW submarine line. Exchanges intensified in subsequent years, facilitated by technical negotiations on capacity allocation and joint equipment maintenance. This interconnection allowed Morocco to benefit from European expertise while providing Spain with additional flexibility in cross-border exchanges.

Meanwhile, Tunisia and Italy began feasibility studies as early as 2003 to link their grids via a submarine connection. Terna, the Italian electricity transmission operator, and the Tunisian Electricity and Gas Company (STEG) validated the technical parameters for a 200-kilometer route in 2007. Engineers focused on the region’s seismic constraints, planning for an initial capacity of 600 MW expandable to 1,000 MW. This trans-Mediterranean cooperation, encouraged by international financial institutions, aimed to stimulate exchanges and stabilize demand during peak periods.

Regulated and Liberalized Markets

The integration of regulated and liberalized electricity markets raises questions about capacity allocation and pricing mechanisms. In Canada, the province of Ontario began liberalizing its electricity market in 2002, while Quebec remained under a regulated model dominated by Hydro-Québec. Early cross-border exchange negotiations, initiated well before liberalization, considered differing consumption profiles in each province. Consequently, Hydro-Québec’s obligation to provide fair access to independent producers faced constraints related to pricing and network management.

In Europe, the implementation of directives aimed at electricity market liberalization, starting in 1996 and reinforced in 2003, transformed interconnection management. The European Commission imposed non-discriminatory network access, while the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) oversaw rule harmonization. Transmission system operators, united within ENTSO-E (European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity), defined standardized protocols to optimize cross-border exchanges. This unified approach reduced regulatory barriers and ensured greater transparency in capacity allocation, although asymmetries persist between countries.

Financial Challenges and Benefit Distribution

Building cross-border infrastructure requires significant capital, often mobilized through partnerships between governments, development banks, and private operators. For instance, the European Investment Bank committed to financing multiple projects linking France to England from the 1970s and later supported extensions to Belgium and the Netherlands. Similarly, the World Bank and the African Development Bank played key roles in fostering interconnections in North and Sub-Saharan Africa. Negotiating long-term contracts, combined with congestion revenue-sharing agreements, reduced investor risk while ensuring transparent benefit distribution.

Capacity allocation often occurs through explicit or implicit auctions, contributing to a congestion price that reflects the scarcity of available capacity. In Europe, day-ahead market coupling was progressively introduced in the 2000s, culminating in 2014 with a single market for most member states. This evolution required harmonizing trading platforms and close coordination between energy exchanges and network operators. Revenue from these auctions was reinvested in interconnection maintenance and expansion, enhancing the reliability of the pan-European electricity system.

Evolution and Diplomatic Strategies

In Eurasia, Turkey and Georgia signed cooperation protocols in 1996 to better coordinate their installations, with an interconnection project materializing in 2002. The Turkish Electricity Transmission Corporation (TEİAŞ) collaborated with Georgia’s Ministry of Energy to adapt technical standards and ensure gradual network synchronization. Regional institutions provided loans to finance infrastructure work, including building compatible transformer stations. This collaboration strengthened Georgia’s position, seeking to open its market to foreign investors and diversify its hydropower exports.

On a broader scale, the notion of a European “supergrid” began to take shape around 2010, supported by industrial consortia and government organizations. The Desertec project, launched in 2009, aimed to harness North Africa’s solar energy for export to Europe via vast direct current networks. Several expert groups assessed the economic feasibility of these interconnections, emphasizing the need for long-term political agreements. Institutional partners also highlighted the importance of clauses ensuring equitable benefit distribution and local ecosystem protection.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences