Strategic agreement between IOC and ADNOC for 1 million tonnes of LNG per year

Indian Oil Corporation has signed a major agreement with ADNOC for 1 million tonnes of LNG per year for 15 years. This commitment strengthens the energy relationship between India and the Emirates, while meeting the growing demand for LNG in India.

Share:

LNG Ruwais project

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) recently signed a significant agreement with Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) for the supply of 1 million metric tons of liquefied natural gas (LNG) per year for 15 years, from the Ruwais LNG project.
This contract, the third signed by IOC in just over a year, is valued at a price of around 12.4% over crude oil.
This type of pricing is common in the industry, where long-term contracts are often indexed to the price of oil to reflect market fluctuations.
The agreement was announced during a visit to India by the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
This partnership is part of a wider context of strengthening energy relations between India and the United Arab Emirates.
In addition to this contract, IOC has also signed a 14-year agreement for 1.2 million tonnes per year with ADNOC in July 2023, as well as another contract for 0.8 million tonnes with Total Energies.
These agreements are designed to meet the growing demand for LNG in India, which is expected to increase until the end of the decade.

Analysis of prices and market conditions

The price of 12.4% over crude is considered relatively high by some market players, who note that other companies and trading houses are offering lower prices.
One market player said, “There are offers that are lower than this 12.4% price against crude, which suggests that there may be other considerations at play.” In general, long-term contracts in Asia use a “slope” formula against crude oil as a benchmark, rather than relying on spot LNG prices.
To put this in perspective, a fixed price of 12.4% over Brent, which was $73.995/MMBtu, would imply a cost of $9.175/MMBtu.
This compares with the derivatives valuation for the year 2027, which was $9.325/MMBtu.
Fluctuations in LNG prices on the spot market, notably due to the increase in volumes expected from 2025 onwards, could also influence the competitiveness of long-term contract prices.

Implications for refining demand

LNG demand in India is not limited to marketing, but must also be analyzed in terms of IOC’s internal needs.
Forecasts indicate that refinery demand will increase considerably by the end of the decade.
For example, the Paradip refinery, which currently consumes 0.8 million standard cubic meters per day, could see its capacity increased to 4.5 million standard cubic meters per day.
Similarly, the Panipat refinery is expected to increase its consumption to 7-7.5 million standard cubic meters per day.
The completion of the Indra Dhanush pipeline is also expected to change the consumption dynamics of the Guwahati and Bongaigaon refineries, which will switch from using locally produced gas to LNG.
These refineries are each expected to consume around 1 million standard cubic meters per day.
LNG’s price competitiveness with other fuels, such as fuel oil and naphtha, will play a crucial role in the uptake of these LNG volumes.

Political and economic considerations

The announcement of the agreement between IOC and ADNOC was relayed by the Abu Dhabi media office, underlining the political dimension of this partnership.
Relations between India and the United Arab Emirates in the energy sector are expanding rapidly, and this type of agreement could pave the way for other future collaborations.
Market players are keeping a close eye on these developments, as they could have repercussions on regional LNG dynamics.
In addition, the agreement’s tariff structure, which benefits from a 2.75% duty exemption under the India-Emirates Free Trade Agreement, represents a significant saving for buyers.
This could also influence the purchasing decisions of other LNG-exporting countries, such as Australia and Malaysia, which also have free trade agreements with India.
The outlook for India’s LNG industry is therefore marked by growing demand and strategic agreements that could shape the country’s energy landscape in the years ahead.
Market players must remain vigilant to price trends and new offers that could emerge in an increasingly competitive environment.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.