Rosneft versus Shell: an energy battle at the heart of European tensions

The case between Rosneft and Shell over the sale of the latter's stake in the PCK Schwedt refinery illustrates the growing tensions in the European energy sector, exacerbated by the current geopolitical context and sanctions against Russia.

Share:

Raffinerie PCK Schwedt en Allemagne

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The case between Rosneft and Shell concerning the sale of the latter’s stake in the PCK Schwedt refinery illustrates the growing tensions in the European energy sector, exacerbated by the current geopolitical context.
Rosneft, which owns 54.17% of the refinery, was stripped of its control in 2022 by the German government following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
This decision marked a turning point in energy relations between Germany and Russia, as Germany took steps to reduce its dependence on Russian energy.
Shell’s decision to sell its 37.5% stake in the refinery to Prax Group, a British company, prompted an immediate reaction from Rosneft, which invoked a right of pre-emption.
However, a preliminary assessment by the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court, published this week, appears to be unfavorable to Rosneft.

Energy context and challenges

The Schwedt refinery, which supplies 90% of the fuel needs of Berlin and the surrounding region, is of strategic importance to Germany.
Rosneft, which held a dominant position in this refinery before the war in Ukraine, now finds itself in a delicate situation.
In 2022, in the face of war and sanctions against Russia, Germany took the decision to place Rosneft’s assets under trusteeship to ensure the continuity of energy supplies.
This reorganization of Russian energy assets in Germany took place against the backdrop of a broader overhaul of German energy policy.
Indeed, Germany’s historical dependence on Russian energy has prompted the country to accelerate the transition to alternative energy sources.
This includes not only diversifying oil supplies, but also strengthening local infrastructures to guarantee energy security.

Legal and strategic issues

Rosneft is contesting the sale on the basis of a shareholders’ agreement granting it priority purchase rights in the event of a share sale.
However, Judge Anne Frister of the Düsseldorf District Court has indicated that the conditions of this right of first refusal may not apply in this specific case, thus weakening Rosneft’s legal position.
For its part, Shell, in partnership with Prax Group, seems confident of reaching an agreement, but Rosneft has already announced that it will appeal if its complaint is rejected.

A decision with geopolitical consequences

Beyond the purely legal aspect, this case has important geopolitical implications.
The war in Ukraine has transformed the European energy landscape, with European Union countries determined to free themselves from dependence on Russian energy.
Germany, in particular, has had to reassess its relations with Russia, leading to the temporary nationalization of certain assets, including Rosneft’s stake in Schwedt.
If Rosneft’s complaint is rejected, this could accelerate the sale of these assets to Western companies, strengthening their presence in the German energy market.

Prax Group’s prospects and Rosneft’s concerns

Rosneft raises concerns about Prax’s ability to manage the refinery effectively.
The company’s lawyers claim that Prax is heavily indebted and lacks experience in the German market, which could adversely affect the facility’s future performance.
These economic concerns highlight the risks associated with selling strategic assets to companies deemed less robust.
However, the German government appears ready to support this transition, as part of its efforts to diversify energy sources and reduce dependence on Russian oil.

Consequences for the European energy market

The court’s final decision will have a major impact not only on Rosneft and Shell, but also on the entire European energy sector.
If Rosneft loses its appeal, it could set a precedent for other Russian companies seeking to retain their assets in Europe.
Conversely, a Rosneft victory could complicate future transactions in the energy sector, particularly with regard to the management of Russian assets under sanctions.
The Rosneft-Shell case highlights the complex interplay between legal, economic and geopolitical considerations in the energy sector.
The situation in Germany reflects a wider movement to reorganize energy supply chains across Europe, a process that will be closely watched by market observers.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.