Rosneft versus Shell: an energy battle at the heart of European tensions

The case between Rosneft and Shell over the sale of the latter's stake in the PCK Schwedt refinery illustrates the growing tensions in the European energy sector, exacerbated by the current geopolitical context and sanctions against Russia.

Share:

Raffinerie PCK Schwedt en Allemagne

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

The case between Rosneft and Shell concerning the sale of the latter’s stake in the PCK Schwedt refinery illustrates the growing tensions in the European energy sector, exacerbated by the current geopolitical context.
Rosneft, which owns 54.17% of the refinery, was stripped of its control in 2022 by the German government following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
This decision marked a turning point in energy relations between Germany and Russia, as Germany took steps to reduce its dependence on Russian energy.
Shell’s decision to sell its 37.5% stake in the refinery to Prax Group, a British company, prompted an immediate reaction from Rosneft, which invoked a right of pre-emption.
However, a preliminary assessment by the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court, published this week, appears to be unfavorable to Rosneft.

Energy context and challenges

The Schwedt refinery, which supplies 90% of the fuel needs of Berlin and the surrounding region, is of strategic importance to Germany.
Rosneft, which held a dominant position in this refinery before the war in Ukraine, now finds itself in a delicate situation.
In 2022, in the face of war and sanctions against Russia, Germany took the decision to place Rosneft’s assets under trusteeship to ensure the continuity of energy supplies.
This reorganization of Russian energy assets in Germany took place against the backdrop of a broader overhaul of German energy policy.
Indeed, Germany’s historical dependence on Russian energy has prompted the country to accelerate the transition to alternative energy sources.
This includes not only diversifying oil supplies, but also strengthening local infrastructures to guarantee energy security.

Legal and strategic issues

Rosneft is contesting the sale on the basis of a shareholders’ agreement granting it priority purchase rights in the event of a share sale.
However, Judge Anne Frister of the Düsseldorf District Court has indicated that the conditions of this right of first refusal may not apply in this specific case, thus weakening Rosneft’s legal position.
For its part, Shell, in partnership with Prax Group, seems confident of reaching an agreement, but Rosneft has already announced that it will appeal if its complaint is rejected.

A decision with geopolitical consequences

Beyond the purely legal aspect, this case has important geopolitical implications.
The war in Ukraine has transformed the European energy landscape, with European Union countries determined to free themselves from dependence on Russian energy.
Germany, in particular, has had to reassess its relations with Russia, leading to the temporary nationalization of certain assets, including Rosneft’s stake in Schwedt.
If Rosneft’s complaint is rejected, this could accelerate the sale of these assets to Western companies, strengthening their presence in the German energy market.

Prax Group’s prospects and Rosneft’s concerns

Rosneft raises concerns about Prax’s ability to manage the refinery effectively.
The company’s lawyers claim that Prax is heavily indebted and lacks experience in the German market, which could adversely affect the facility’s future performance.
These economic concerns highlight the risks associated with selling strategic assets to companies deemed less robust.
However, the German government appears ready to support this transition, as part of its efforts to diversify energy sources and reduce dependence on Russian oil.

Consequences for the European energy market

The court’s final decision will have a major impact not only on Rosneft and Shell, but also on the entire European energy sector.
If Rosneft loses its appeal, it could set a precedent for other Russian companies seeking to retain their assets in Europe.
Conversely, a Rosneft victory could complicate future transactions in the energy sector, particularly with regard to the management of Russian assets under sanctions.
The Rosneft-Shell case highlights the complex interplay between legal, economic and geopolitical considerations in the energy sector.
The situation in Germany reflects a wider movement to reorganize energy supply chains across Europe, a process that will be closely watched by market observers.

France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.
Athens and Tripoli engage in a negotiation process to define their exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean, amid geopolitical tensions and underwater energy stakes.
European powers demand concrete steps from Tehran on nuclear issue or United Nations sanctions will be reinstated, as IAEA inspections remain blocked and tensions with Washington persist.
Brussels confirms its target to end all Russian energy imports by 2028, despite growing diplomatic pressure from Washington amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump threatens to escalate US sanctions against Russia, but only if NATO member states stop all Russian oil imports, which remain active via certain pipelines.
The two countries agreed to develop infrastructure dedicated to liquefied natural gas to strengthen Europe's energy security and boost transatlantic trade.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.
Brazil’s Cop 30 presidency aims to leverage the Dubai commitments to mobilise public and private actors despite ongoing deadlock in international negotiations.
Brasília has officially begun the process of joining the International Energy Agency, strengthening its strategic position on the global energy stage after years of close cooperation with the Paris-based organisation.
During a meeting in Beijing, Vladimir Putin called on Slovakia to suspend its energy deliveries to Ukraine, citing Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy infrastructure as justification.
Vladimir Putin and Robert Fico met in China to address the war in Ukraine, regional security and energy relations between Russia and Slovakia.