Rosneft versus Shell: an energy battle at the heart of European tensions

The case between Rosneft and Shell over the sale of the latter's stake in the PCK Schwedt refinery illustrates the growing tensions in the European energy sector, exacerbated by the current geopolitical context and sanctions against Russia.

Share:

Raffinerie PCK Schwedt en Allemagne

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The case between Rosneft and Shell concerning the sale of the latter’s stake in the PCK Schwedt refinery illustrates the growing tensions in the European energy sector, exacerbated by the current geopolitical context.
Rosneft, which owns 54.17% of the refinery, was stripped of its control in 2022 by the German government following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
This decision marked a turning point in energy relations between Germany and Russia, as Germany took steps to reduce its dependence on Russian energy.
Shell’s decision to sell its 37.5% stake in the refinery to Prax Group, a British company, prompted an immediate reaction from Rosneft, which invoked a right of pre-emption.
However, a preliminary assessment by the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court, published this week, appears to be unfavorable to Rosneft.

Energy context and challenges

The Schwedt refinery, which supplies 90% of the fuel needs of Berlin and the surrounding region, is of strategic importance to Germany.
Rosneft, which held a dominant position in this refinery before the war in Ukraine, now finds itself in a delicate situation.
In 2022, in the face of war and sanctions against Russia, Germany took the decision to place Rosneft’s assets under trusteeship to ensure the continuity of energy supplies.
This reorganization of Russian energy assets in Germany took place against the backdrop of a broader overhaul of German energy policy.
Indeed, Germany’s historical dependence on Russian energy has prompted the country to accelerate the transition to alternative energy sources.
This includes not only diversifying oil supplies, but also strengthening local infrastructures to guarantee energy security.

Legal and strategic issues

Rosneft is contesting the sale on the basis of a shareholders’ agreement granting it priority purchase rights in the event of a share sale.
However, Judge Anne Frister of the Düsseldorf District Court has indicated that the conditions of this right of first refusal may not apply in this specific case, thus weakening Rosneft’s legal position.
For its part, Shell, in partnership with Prax Group, seems confident of reaching an agreement, but Rosneft has already announced that it will appeal if its complaint is rejected.

A decision with geopolitical consequences

Beyond the purely legal aspect, this case has important geopolitical implications.
The war in Ukraine has transformed the European energy landscape, with European Union countries determined to free themselves from dependence on Russian energy.
Germany, in particular, has had to reassess its relations with Russia, leading to the temporary nationalization of certain assets, including Rosneft’s stake in Schwedt.
If Rosneft’s complaint is rejected, this could accelerate the sale of these assets to Western companies, strengthening their presence in the German energy market.

Prax Group’s prospects and Rosneft’s concerns

Rosneft raises concerns about Prax’s ability to manage the refinery effectively.
The company’s lawyers claim that Prax is heavily indebted and lacks experience in the German market, which could adversely affect the facility’s future performance.
These economic concerns highlight the risks associated with selling strategic assets to companies deemed less robust.
However, the German government appears ready to support this transition, as part of its efforts to diversify energy sources and reduce dependence on Russian oil.

Consequences for the European energy market

The court’s final decision will have a major impact not only on Rosneft and Shell, but also on the entire European energy sector.
If Rosneft loses its appeal, it could set a precedent for other Russian companies seeking to retain their assets in Europe.
Conversely, a Rosneft victory could complicate future transactions in the energy sector, particularly with regard to the management of Russian assets under sanctions.
The Rosneft-Shell case highlights the complex interplay between legal, economic and geopolitical considerations in the energy sector.
The situation in Germany reflects a wider movement to reorganize energy supply chains across Europe, a process that will be closely watched by market observers.

China reduces its mining presence in Canada and Greenland, constrained by hostile regulatory frameworks, and consolidates public investments in Arctic Russia to secure strategic supplies.
The Turkish president suggested to Vladimir Putin a limited ceasefire targeting Ukrainian ports and energy facilities to reduce risks to strategic assets and pave the way for negotiations.
New Delhi and Moscow strengthen their energy corridor despite US tariff and regulatory pressure, maintaining oil flows supported by alternative logistical and financial mechanisms.
The United States strengthens its energy presence in the Eastern Mediterranean by consolidating a gas corridor through Greece to Central Europe, to the detriment of Russian flows and Chinese logistical influence over the Port of Piraeus.
Paris and Beijing agree to create a bilateral climate task force focused on nuclear technologies, renewable energy and maritime sectors, amid escalating trade tensions between China and the European Union.
Ankara plans to invest in US gas production to secure LNG supply and become a key supplier to Southern Europe, according to the Turkish Energy Minister.
Three Russian tankers targeted off the Turkish coast have reignited Ankara’s concerns about oil and gas supply security in the Black Sea and the vulnerability of its subsea infrastructure.
Bucharest authorises an exceptional takeover of Lukoil’s local assets to avoid a supply shock while complying with international sanctions. Three buyers are already in advanced talks.
European governments want to add review and safeguard mechanisms to the trade deal with Washington to prevent a potential surge of US imports from disrupting their industrial base.
The Khor Mor gas field, operated by Pearl Petroleum, was hit by an armed drone, halting production and causing power outages affecting 80% of Kurdistan’s electricity capacity.
Global South Utilities is investing $1 billion in new solar, wind and storage projects to strengthen Yemen's energy capacity and expand its regional influence.
British International Investment and FirstRand partner to finance the decarbonisation of African companies through a facility focused on supporting high-emission sectors.
Budapest moves to secure Serbian oil supply, threatened by Croatia’s suspension of crude flows following US sanctions on the Russian-controlled NIS refinery.
Moscow says it wants to increase oil and liquefied natural gas exports to Beijing, while consolidating bilateral cooperation amid US sanctions targeting Russian producers.
The European Investment Bank is mobilising €2bn in financing backed by the European Commission for energy projects in Africa, with a strategic objective rooted in the European Union’s energy diplomacy.
Russia faces a structural decline in energy revenues as strengthened sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil disrupt trade flows and deepen the federal budget deficit.
Washington imposes new sanctions targeting vessels, shipowners and intermediaries in Asia, increasing the regulatory risk of Iranian oil trade and redefining maritime compliance in the region.
OFAC’s licence for Paks II circumvents sanctions on Rosatom in exchange for US technological involvement, reshaping the balance of interests between Moscow, Budapest and Washington.
Finland, Estonia, Hungary and Czechia are multiplying bilateral initiatives in Africa to capture strategic energy and mining projects under the European Global Gateway programme.
The Brazilian president calls for a voluntary and non-binding energy transition during COP30 in Belém, avoiding direct confrontation with oil-producing countries.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.