Rosneft versus Shell: an energy battle at the heart of European tensions

The case between Rosneft and Shell over the sale of the latter's stake in the PCK Schwedt refinery illustrates the growing tensions in the European energy sector, exacerbated by the current geopolitical context and sanctions against Russia.

Share:

Raffinerie PCK Schwedt en Allemagne

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The case between Rosneft and Shell concerning the sale of the latter’s stake in the PCK Schwedt refinery illustrates the growing tensions in the European energy sector, exacerbated by the current geopolitical context.
Rosneft, which owns 54.17% of the refinery, was stripped of its control in 2022 by the German government following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
This decision marked a turning point in energy relations between Germany and Russia, as Germany took steps to reduce its dependence on Russian energy.
Shell’s decision to sell its 37.5% stake in the refinery to Prax Group, a British company, prompted an immediate reaction from Rosneft, which invoked a right of pre-emption.
However, a preliminary assessment by the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court, published this week, appears to be unfavorable to Rosneft.

Energy context and challenges

The Schwedt refinery, which supplies 90% of the fuel needs of Berlin and the surrounding region, is of strategic importance to Germany.
Rosneft, which held a dominant position in this refinery before the war in Ukraine, now finds itself in a delicate situation.
In 2022, in the face of war and sanctions against Russia, Germany took the decision to place Rosneft’s assets under trusteeship to ensure the continuity of energy supplies.
This reorganization of Russian energy assets in Germany took place against the backdrop of a broader overhaul of German energy policy.
Indeed, Germany’s historical dependence on Russian energy has prompted the country to accelerate the transition to alternative energy sources.
This includes not only diversifying oil supplies, but also strengthening local infrastructures to guarantee energy security.

Legal and strategic issues

Rosneft is contesting the sale on the basis of a shareholders’ agreement granting it priority purchase rights in the event of a share sale.
However, Judge Anne Frister of the Düsseldorf District Court has indicated that the conditions of this right of first refusal may not apply in this specific case, thus weakening Rosneft’s legal position.
For its part, Shell, in partnership with Prax Group, seems confident of reaching an agreement, but Rosneft has already announced that it will appeal if its complaint is rejected.

A decision with geopolitical consequences

Beyond the purely legal aspect, this case has important geopolitical implications.
The war in Ukraine has transformed the European energy landscape, with European Union countries determined to free themselves from dependence on Russian energy.
Germany, in particular, has had to reassess its relations with Russia, leading to the temporary nationalization of certain assets, including Rosneft’s stake in Schwedt.
If Rosneft’s complaint is rejected, this could accelerate the sale of these assets to Western companies, strengthening their presence in the German energy market.

Prax Group’s prospects and Rosneft’s concerns

Rosneft raises concerns about Prax’s ability to manage the refinery effectively.
The company’s lawyers claim that Prax is heavily indebted and lacks experience in the German market, which could adversely affect the facility’s future performance.
These economic concerns highlight the risks associated with selling strategic assets to companies deemed less robust.
However, the German government appears ready to support this transition, as part of its efforts to diversify energy sources and reduce dependence on Russian oil.

Consequences for the European energy market

The court’s final decision will have a major impact not only on Rosneft and Shell, but also on the entire European energy sector.
If Rosneft loses its appeal, it could set a precedent for other Russian companies seeking to retain their assets in Europe.
Conversely, a Rosneft victory could complicate future transactions in the energy sector, particularly with regard to the management of Russian assets under sanctions.
The Rosneft-Shell case highlights the complex interplay between legal, economic and geopolitical considerations in the energy sector.
The situation in Germany reflects a wider movement to reorganize energy supply chains across Europe, a process that will be closely watched by market observers.

Moscow says it wants to increase oil and liquefied natural gas exports to Beijing, while consolidating bilateral cooperation amid US sanctions targeting Russian producers.
The European Investment Bank is mobilising €2bn in financing backed by the European Commission for energy projects in Africa, with a strategic objective rooted in the European Union’s energy diplomacy.
Russia faces a structural decline in energy revenues as strengthened sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil disrupt trade flows and deepen the federal budget deficit.
Washington imposes new sanctions targeting vessels, shipowners and intermediaries in Asia, increasing the regulatory risk of Iranian oil trade and redefining maritime compliance in the region.
OFAC’s licence for Paks II circumvents sanctions on Rosatom in exchange for US technological involvement, reshaping the balance of interests between Moscow, Budapest and Washington.
Finland, Estonia, Hungary and Czechia are multiplying bilateral initiatives in Africa to capture strategic energy and mining projects under the European Global Gateway programme.
The Brazilian president calls for a voluntary and non-binding energy transition during COP30 in Belém, avoiding direct confrontation with oil-producing countries.
The region attracted only a small share of global capital allocated to renewables in 2024, despite high energy needs and ambitious development goals, according to a report published in November.
The United States approves South Korea’s development of civilian uranium enrichment capabilities and supports a nuclear-powered submarine project, expanding a strategic partnership already linked to a major trade agreement.
The EU member states agree to prioritise a loan mechanism backed by immobilised Russian assets to finance aid to Ukraine, reducing national budgetary impact while ensuring enhanced funding capacity.
The Canadian government commits $56 billion to a new wave of infrastructure projects aimed at expanding energy corridors, accelerating critical mineral extraction and reinforcing strategic capacity.
Berlin strengthens its cooperation with Abuja through funding aimed at supporting Nigeria’s energy diversification and consolidating its renewable infrastructure.
COP30 begins in Belém under uncertainty, as countries fail to agree on key discussion topics, highlighting deep divisions over climate finance and the global energy transition.
The United States secures a tungsten joint venture in Kazakhstan and mining protocols in Uzbekistan, with financing envisaged from the Export-Import Bank of the United States and shipment routed via the Trans-Caspian corridor.
The United States grants Hungary a one-year waiver on sanctions targeting Russian oil, in return for a commitment to purchase US liquefied natural gas worth $600mn.
Meeting in Canada, G7 energy ministers unveiled a series of projects aimed at securing supply chains for critical minerals, in response to China’s restrictions on rare earth exports.
Donald Trump announces an immediate reduction in tariffs on Chinese fentanyl-related imports from 20% to 10%, potentially impacting energy flows between Washington and Beijing.
Amman plans to launch tenders for 400 megawatts of solar, wind and storage projects, as part of a strengthened bilateral energy cooperation with Germany.
An emergency meeting led by the European Commission gathers key sectors affected by China's export restrictions on rare earths, ahead of a briefing at the European Parliament.
Manila plans to expand gas and renewable energy production to meet a 6.6% increase in electricity demand over the next two years.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.