Rosneft versus Shell: an energy battle at the heart of European tensions

The case between Rosneft and Shell over the sale of the latter's stake in the PCK Schwedt refinery illustrates the growing tensions in the European energy sector, exacerbated by the current geopolitical context and sanctions against Russia.

Share:

Raffinerie PCK Schwedt en Allemagne

Subscribe for unlimited access to all energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

Your 1st year at 99 $*

then 199 $/year

*renews at 199$/year, cancel anytime before renewal.

The case between Rosneft and Shell concerning the sale of the latter’s stake in the PCK Schwedt refinery illustrates the growing tensions in the European energy sector, exacerbated by the current geopolitical context.
Rosneft, which owns 54.17% of the refinery, was stripped of its control in 2022 by the German government following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
This decision marked a turning point in energy relations between Germany and Russia, as Germany took steps to reduce its dependence on Russian energy.
Shell’s decision to sell its 37.5% stake in the refinery to Prax Group, a British company, prompted an immediate reaction from Rosneft, which invoked a right of pre-emption.
However, a preliminary assessment by the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court, published this week, appears to be unfavorable to Rosneft.

Energy context and challenges

The Schwedt refinery, which supplies 90% of the fuel needs of Berlin and the surrounding region, is of strategic importance to Germany.
Rosneft, which held a dominant position in this refinery before the war in Ukraine, now finds itself in a delicate situation.
In 2022, in the face of war and sanctions against Russia, Germany took the decision to place Rosneft’s assets under trusteeship to ensure the continuity of energy supplies.
This reorganization of Russian energy assets in Germany took place against the backdrop of a broader overhaul of German energy policy.
Indeed, Germany’s historical dependence on Russian energy has prompted the country to accelerate the transition to alternative energy sources.
This includes not only diversifying oil supplies, but also strengthening local infrastructures to guarantee energy security.

Legal and strategic issues

Rosneft is contesting the sale on the basis of a shareholders’ agreement granting it priority purchase rights in the event of a share sale.
However, Judge Anne Frister of the Düsseldorf District Court has indicated that the conditions of this right of first refusal may not apply in this specific case, thus weakening Rosneft’s legal position.
For its part, Shell, in partnership with Prax Group, seems confident of reaching an agreement, but Rosneft has already announced that it will appeal if its complaint is rejected.

A decision with geopolitical consequences

Beyond the purely legal aspect, this case has important geopolitical implications.
The war in Ukraine has transformed the European energy landscape, with European Union countries determined to free themselves from dependence on Russian energy.
Germany, in particular, has had to reassess its relations with Russia, leading to the temporary nationalization of certain assets, including Rosneft’s stake in Schwedt.
If Rosneft’s complaint is rejected, this could accelerate the sale of these assets to Western companies, strengthening their presence in the German energy market.

Prax Group’s prospects and Rosneft’s concerns

Rosneft raises concerns about Prax’s ability to manage the refinery effectively.
The company’s lawyers claim that Prax is heavily indebted and lacks experience in the German market, which could adversely affect the facility’s future performance.
These economic concerns highlight the risks associated with selling strategic assets to companies deemed less robust.
However, the German government appears ready to support this transition, as part of its efforts to diversify energy sources and reduce dependence on Russian oil.

Consequences for the European energy market

The court’s final decision will have a major impact not only on Rosneft and Shell, but also on the entire European energy sector.
If Rosneft loses its appeal, it could set a precedent for other Russian companies seeking to retain their assets in Europe.
Conversely, a Rosneft victory could complicate future transactions in the energy sector, particularly with regard to the management of Russian assets under sanctions.
The Rosneft-Shell case highlights the complex interplay between legal, economic and geopolitical considerations in the energy sector.
The situation in Germany reflects a wider movement to reorganize energy supply chains across Europe, a process that will be closely watched by market observers.

Iran once again authorises the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect its nuclear sites, following a suspension triggered by a dispute over responsibility for Israeli strikes.
First suspect linked to the Nord Stream pipeline explosions, a Ukrainian citizen challenged by Berlin opposes his judicial transfer from Italy.
Ukrainian drones targeted a nuclear power plant and a Russian oil terminal, increasing pressure on diplomatic talks as Moscow and Kyiv accuse each other of blocking any prospect of negotiation.
A Ukrainian national suspected of coordinating the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage has been apprehended in Italy, reigniting a judicial case with significant geopolitical implications across Europe.
Russia continues hydrocarbon deliveries to India and explores new outlets for liquefied natural gas, amid escalating trade tensions with the United States.
Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.

or

Go unlimited with our annual offer: $99 for the 1styear year, then $ 199/year.