Rosneft loses its appeal against the sale of the Schwedt refinery

The Düsseldorf court has rejected Rosneft’s lawsuit against Shell’s sale of its stake in the Schwedt refinery, marking a key step in the restructuring of German energy assets.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The decision by the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf regarding the sale of Shell’s stake in the Schwedt refinery to Prax Group has major implications for the European energy landscape. Rosneft, one of the main shareholders of the refinery with 54.17% ownership, had filed a lawsuit to block the transaction. However, the court found that Rosneft’s arguments lacked legal basis.

Geopolitical Context of the Case

This case occurs amid the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has profoundly reshaped energy relations between Europe and Russia. In 2022, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Germany stripped Rosneft of control over its assets in the Schwedt refinery, a key facility for fuel supply to northeastern Germany, including the Berlin region. This move was part of Germany’s broader effort to reduce its dependency on Russian oil.

Rosneft’s Arguments

Rosneft argued that it had a right of first refusal on Shell’s shares, based on an agreement with the other shareholders of the refinery. The Russian company claimed that the sale to Prax Group would undermine its own future plans to divest its stake. However, the court pointed out that Rosneft had declined Shell’s offer in writing, which nullified its claims.

Consequences of the Decision

This dismissal of Rosneft’s lawsuit could have significant repercussions for its strategy in Germany, particularly regarding its ability to maintain its remaining assets in the country. Rosneft may need to enter negotiations to sell its remaining shares, an option already discussed with partners like Qatar, a major investor in Germany’s energy sector.

For its part, Shell continues to pursue its strategy of divesting non-core oil assets in favor of focusing on low-carbon projects and renewable energy. The choice of Prax Group as the buyer highlights the continued attractiveness of European oil infrastructure to private investors, despite the shift toward cleaner energy.

Legal Prospects

Rosneft has the option to appeal this decision to the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof). However, the strength of its case is weakened by the fact that it explicitly declined Shell’s initial offer. Therefore, the chances of success on appeal seem limited, though the final outcome remains uncertain.

This ruling by the Düsseldorf court is emblematic of the current geopolitical tensions and structural changes taking place in the European energy sector. The sanctions imposed on Russia and Germany’s efforts to secure its energy supply by diversifying its partners further complicate Rosneft’s position in Europe.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.