Record fine for Enel and Eni for Abusive Commercial Practices

In Italy, the Antitrust Authority fines Enel and Eni 15 million euros for illegally raising energy prices.

Share:

Amendes record contre pratiques abusives

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

Italy’s energy market was recently rocked by a decision from the country’s competition regulator, Antitrust. At a time when consumers are increasingly sensitive to fluctuations in energy prices, the authority has imposed severe penalties on several energy suppliers for practices deemed abusive.

Enel and Eni’s Contested Tariff Practices

Enel and Eni are at the heart of this controversy. Enel, with a fine of 10 million euros, and Eni, penalized to the tune of 5 million, are accused of having unilaterally modified the energy tariffs of more than four million consumers. This decision, based on contractual clauses allowing price revisions, was deemed contrary to the standards set by the Antitrust Authority.

Regulatory Challenges in a Changing Energy Market

This situation reveals the growing tensions between energy suppliers and regulators in a changing market. The stakes are high: protecting consumers’ interests while ensuring a fair competitive environment. The Antitrust ruling, while specific to Italy, raises broader questions about the regulation of energy markets in Europe and elsewhere.
Other companies sanctioned, albeit to a lesser extent, include Acea Energia, Iberdrola Clienti Italia, Dolomiti Energia and Edison Energia. These penalties range from 560,000 euros to 5,000 euros, reflecting different levels of seriousness in their practices. Antitrust characterized these practices as “aggressive”, highlighting the use of commercial tactics to condition consumers to accept price increases.

Various penalties for other players in the energy market

The situation is all the more critical as Italy, like many other countries, is going through a difficult economic period, exacerbated by the war in Ukraine. The Italian government had introduced measures to control electricity and gas prices between August 10, 2022 and June 30, 2023. However, the companies concerned went beyond this regulation, sending their customers letters suggesting acceptance of new pricing conditions, resulting in significantly higher invoices.

Reactions and Implications for Enel and Eni in the Regulatory Context

In response, Enel has stated that it intends to appeal the decision, claiming that it will scrupulously comply with the law. For its part, Eni, also in the firing line, has indicated that it will examine the Antitrust ruling in detail before deciding how to proceed.
This case highlights the growing complexity of energy market regulation. On the one hand, companies are seeking to maximize their profits in a highly competitive sector. On the other hand, regulators and governments are responsible for protecting consumers and keeping prices affordable, especially in times of crisis.
The scale of the fines imposed underlines the perceived seriousness of the offences, and sends a strong message to the industry as a whole. As the debate on energy market regulation continues, this decision could have repercussions far beyond Italy’s borders.

The Italian Antitrust Authority’s decision against Enel and Eni highlights the tension between maximizing corporate profits and protecting consumers in a changing energy market.

Facing a structural electricity surplus, the government commits to releasing a new Multiannual Energy Programme by Christmas, as aligning supply, demand and investments becomes a key industrial and budgetary issue.
A key scientific report by the United Nations Environment Programme failed to gain state approval due to deep divisions over fossil fuels and other sensitive issues.
RTE warns of France’s delay in electrifying energy uses, a key step to limiting fossil fuel imports and supporting its reindustrialisation strategy.
India’s central authority has cancelled 6.3 GW of grid connections for renewable projects since 2022, marking a tightening of regulations and a shift in responsibility back to developers.
The Brazilian government has been instructed to define within two months a plan for the gradual reduction of fossil fuels, supported by a national energy transition fund financed by oil revenues.
The German government may miss the January 2026 deadline to transpose the RED III directive, creating uncertainty over biofuel mandates and disrupting markets.
Italy allocated 82% of the proposed solar and wind capacities in the Fer-X auction, totalling 8.6GW, with competitive purchase prices and a strong concentration of projects in the southern part of the country.
Amid rising public spending, the French government has tasked two experts with reassessing the support scheme for renewable electricity and storage, with proposals expected within three months.
National operator PSE partners with armed forces to protect transformer stations as critical infrastructure faces sabotage linked to foreign interference.
The Norwegian government establishes a commission to anticipate the decline of hydrocarbons and assess economic options for the country in the coming decades.
Kazakhstan plans to allocate 3 GW of wind and solar projects by the end of 2026 through public tenders, with a first 1 GW tranche in 2025, amid efforts to modernise its power system.
Hurricanes Beryl, Helene and Milton accounted for 80% of electricity outages recorded in 2024, marking a ten-year high according to federal data.
The French Energy Regulatory Commission introduces a temporary prudential control on gas and electricity suppliers through a “guichet à blanc” opening in December, pending the transposition of European rules.
The Carney–Smith agreement launches a new pipeline to Asia, removes oil and gas emission caps, and initiates reform of the Pacific north coast tanker ban.
The gradual exit from CfD contracts is turning stable assets into infrastructures exposed to higher volatility, challenging expected returns and traditional financing models for the renewable sector.
The Canadian government introduces major legislative changes to the Energy Efficiency Act to support its national strategy and adapt to the realities of digital commerce.
Quebec becomes the only Canadian province where a carbon price still applies directly to fuels, as Ottawa eliminated the public-facing carbon tax in April 2025.
New Delhi launches a 72.8 bn INR incentive plan to build a 6,000-tonne domestic capacity for permanent magnets, amid rising Chinese export restrictions on critical components.
The rise of CfDs, PPAs and capacity mechanisms signals a structural shift: markets alone no longer cover 10–30-year financing needs, while spot prices have surged 400% in Europe since 2019.
Germany plans to finalise the €5.8bn ($6.34bn) purchase of a 25.1% stake in TenneT Germany to strengthen its control over critical national power grid infrastructure.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.