Putin proposes mediator role between Washington and Tehran over Iran’s nuclear issue

The Kremlin has confirmed that Vladimir Putin aims to help resolve the nuclear dispute between the United States and Iran, leveraging strengthened strategic ties with Tehran.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed to his American counterpart Donald Trump to intervene in the nuclear dispute between the United States and Iran, according to a statement from the Kremlin released on June 5. This mediation offer follows a phone call between the two leaders, during which Putin mentioned his willingness to “contribute to the resolution” of the crisis by using his close ties with the Islamic Republic.

A strategic signal of openness from Moscow

According to Dmitry Peskov, spokesperson for the Russian presidency, Moscow believes that its partnership with Iran could be used to support de-escalation on the nuclear issue. The official specified that Russia, which “maintains a close partnership with Tehran,” is “ready to make use of this partnership” to “contribute to the resolution of the Iranian nuclear issue.”

Donald Trump confirmed that Vladimir Putin hinted at his interest in taking part in the indirect talks between Washington and Tehran. Five rounds of negotiations have taken place since April under Omani mediation, without leading to a breakthrough.

A persistent deadlock on enrichment

The main sticking point remains uranium enrichment, on which Iran refuses to make concessions without the lifting of economic sanctions. “No enrichment, no deal,” summarised Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on the platform X. He reiterated that his country ruled out freezing its civil nuclear programme, citing its right to energy development.

Donald Trump responded by accusing Iran of “dragging its feet,” while Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, rejected the latest U.S. proposal, claiming it was incompatible with the founding principles of the regime.

Strengthened Russia-Iran alignment

Since the start of Russia’s military offensive in Ukraine in 2022, Moscow and Tehran have deepened their cooperation. In January, the two countries signed a “comprehensive strategic partnership” agreement, including Russian support for Iran’s civil nuclear programme. The Kremlin reaffirmed its support for a “peaceful settlement” and for Iran’s “right” to civilian nuclear energy.

This willingness to play an active role in nuclear diplomacy could reposition Moscow as a key interlocutor in a matter so far dominated by bilateral tensions between Washington and Tehran.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
Consent Preferences