Oil and gas licenses: authorization from the USA

Joe Biden's administration is issuing new oil and gas licenses in the Gulf of Mexico, drawing criticism from environmentalists and the oil and gas industry. Discover the implications and reactions to this controversial decision.

Share:

exploitation de pétrole et de gaz

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

Oil and gas licenses in the Gulf of Mexico, authorized by President Biden, break his climate-friendly campaign promise, sparking controversy.

Joe Biden’s administration recently announced its decision to issue new oil and gas licenses in the Gulf of Mexico, provoking a strong reaction from environmental groups and the oil and gas industry. This decision, which runs counter to the Democratic president’s campaign promise to combat climate change, has sparked intense debate.

Background and implications

The Interior Department’s announcement came as a shock to many environmentalists, who see the measure as a major setback in the fight against climate change. The decision authorizes three drilling licenses for the period 2025-2029, a considerably smaller number than the 47 planned for the same period under Donald Trump’s previous administration.

According to the Department of the Interior, this decision stems from legislation known as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which requires the state to open up hydrocarbon permits in order to allow more wind projects. The measure was part of President Biden’s energy and climate transition effort, although he had to compromise to get Congressional approval in 2022.

Passionately debated on both sides of the political spectrum, this decision is being defended by the Biden-Harris administration as a way of supporting the growing wind industry. “The Biden-Harris administration is committed to building a clean energy future that ensures energy independence for America,” said Deb Haaland, Secretary of the Interior.

Reviews and reactions

However,environmental and climate associations have strongly criticized this decision. Beth Lowell of NGO Oceana calls it “beyond disappointing”, noting that it comes as the U.S. faces increasingly frequent and severe climate disasters, including wildfires, droughts, hurricanes and floods. She also accuses President Biden of favoring the interests of polluters over real solutions for the climate.

Mattea Mrkusic, from the Evergreen Action association, points out that experts have been warning for years that any new fossil fuel production is incompatible with the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. What’s more, the International Energy Agency (IEA) recently confirmed that such fossil fuel projects are not necessary to meet energy demand.

The main American oil lobby, the American Petroleum Institute, also criticized the decision, calling it “too restrictive”. Mike Sommers, President of API, believes that this energy policy is contributing to inflation and high costs at the pump, which are already being felt by Americans.

The consequences of the decision

The US government’s decision to issue new oil and gas licenses in the Gulf of Mexico has provoked a mixed reaction, with potential benefits for the wind industry, but also strong criticism from environmentalists and the oil and gas industry. It highlights the complex challenges facing the Biden administration as it attempts to reconcile environmental goals with current political and economic realities. This decision will undoubtedly have a major impact on the climate debate in the United States.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.
Brazil’s Cop 30 presidency aims to leverage the Dubai commitments to mobilise public and private actors despite ongoing deadlock in international negotiations.
Brasília has officially begun the process of joining the International Energy Agency, strengthening its strategic position on the global energy stage after years of close cooperation with the Paris-based organisation.
During a meeting in Beijing, Vladimir Putin called on Slovakia to suspend its energy deliveries to Ukraine, citing Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy infrastructure as justification.
Vladimir Putin and Robert Fico met in China to address the war in Ukraine, regional security and energy relations between Russia and Slovakia.
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico plans to meet Vladimir Putin in Beijing before receiving Volodymyr Zelensky in Bratislava, marking a diplomatic shift in his relations with Moscow and Kyiv.
The three European powers activate the UN sanctions mechanism against Iran, increasing pressure on the country's oil exports as Tehran maintains high production despite Western measures.
Iran once again authorises the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect its nuclear sites, following a suspension triggered by a dispute over responsibility for Israeli strikes.
First suspect linked to the Nord Stream pipeline explosions, a Ukrainian citizen challenged by Berlin opposes his judicial transfer from Italy.
Ukrainian drones targeted a nuclear power plant and a Russian oil terminal, increasing pressure on diplomatic talks as Moscow and Kyiv accuse each other of blocking any prospect of negotiation.
A Ukrainian national suspected of coordinating the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage has been apprehended in Italy, reigniting a judicial case with significant geopolitical implications across Europe.
Russia continues hydrocarbon deliveries to India and explores new outlets for liquefied natural gas, amid escalating trade tensions with the United States.
Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.