Oil and gas licenses: authorization from the USA

Joe Biden's administration is issuing new oil and gas licenses in the Gulf of Mexico, drawing criticism from environmentalists and the oil and gas industry. Discover the implications and reactions to this controversial decision.

Share:

exploitation de pétrole et de gaz

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

Oil and gas licenses in the Gulf of Mexico, authorized by President Biden, break his climate-friendly campaign promise, sparking controversy.

Joe Biden’s administration recently announced its decision to issue new oil and gas licenses in the Gulf of Mexico, provoking a strong reaction from environmental groups and the oil and gas industry. This decision, which runs counter to the Democratic president’s campaign promise to combat climate change, has sparked intense debate.

Background and implications

The Interior Department’s announcement came as a shock to many environmentalists, who see the measure as a major setback in the fight against climate change. The decision authorizes three drilling licenses for the period 2025-2029, a considerably smaller number than the 47 planned for the same period under Donald Trump’s previous administration.

According to the Department of the Interior, this decision stems from legislation known as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which requires the state to open up hydrocarbon permits in order to allow more wind projects. The measure was part of President Biden’s energy and climate transition effort, although he had to compromise to get Congressional approval in 2022.

Passionately debated on both sides of the political spectrum, this decision is being defended by the Biden-Harris administration as a way of supporting the growing wind industry. “The Biden-Harris administration is committed to building a clean energy future that ensures energy independence for America,” said Deb Haaland, Secretary of the Interior.

Reviews and reactions

However,environmental and climate associations have strongly criticized this decision. Beth Lowell of NGO Oceana calls it “beyond disappointing”, noting that it comes as the U.S. faces increasingly frequent and severe climate disasters, including wildfires, droughts, hurricanes and floods. She also accuses President Biden of favoring the interests of polluters over real solutions for the climate.

Mattea Mrkusic, from the Evergreen Action association, points out that experts have been warning for years that any new fossil fuel production is incompatible with the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. What’s more, the International Energy Agency (IEA) recently confirmed that such fossil fuel projects are not necessary to meet energy demand.

The main American oil lobby, the American Petroleum Institute, also criticized the decision, calling it “too restrictive”. Mike Sommers, President of API, believes that this energy policy is contributing to inflation and high costs at the pump, which are already being felt by Americans.

The consequences of the decision

The US government’s decision to issue new oil and gas licenses in the Gulf of Mexico has provoked a mixed reaction, with potential benefits for the wind industry, but also strong criticism from environmentalists and the oil and gas industry. It highlights the complex challenges facing the Biden administration as it attempts to reconcile environmental goals with current political and economic realities. This decision will undoubtedly have a major impact on the climate debate in the United States.

Ambassadors of European Union member states have approved the transmission of a legislative proposal to phase out Russian fossil fuel imports by January 2028 to the Council of Ministers.
The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.
Athens and Tripoli engage in a negotiation process to define their exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean, amid geopolitical tensions and underwater energy stakes.
European powers demand concrete steps from Tehran on nuclear issue or United Nations sanctions will be reinstated, as IAEA inspections remain blocked and tensions with Washington persist.
Brussels confirms its target to end all Russian energy imports by 2028, despite growing diplomatic pressure from Washington amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump threatens to escalate US sanctions against Russia, but only if NATO member states stop all Russian oil imports, which remain active via certain pipelines.
The two countries agreed to develop infrastructure dedicated to liquefied natural gas to strengthen Europe's energy security and boost transatlantic trade.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.