Nord Stream gas pipelines sabotaged by a “pro-Ukrainian group”?

According to information consulted by American intelligence, a "pro-Ukrainian group" was behind the sabotage of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea last year. This act has added to the geopolitical tension around these pipelines which have been at the heart of the confrontation between Russia and Ukraine.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The New York Times recently reported that information accessed by U.S. intelligence pointed to a “pro-Ukrainian group” as being responsible for the sabotage of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea, which occurred last year. The gas leaks, preceded by underwater explosions, were detected in September 2022, fuelling already high tensions between Russia and Ukraine.

The perpetrators of the sabotage would be “opponents of Vladimir Putin”

The New York Times does not specify the nature of the information to which the American intelligence had access, nor the identity of this “pro-Ukrainian group”. According to U.S. officials, however, there is no indication that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was involved in the sabotage. Information gathered suggests that the perpetrators were “opponents of Russian President Vladimir Putin,” probably Ukrainian or Russian nationals, according to the newspaper.

The New York Times says that this information allows “no firm conclusion” and “leaves open the possibility that the operation was launched secretly by a third force with ties to the Ukrainian government or its security services. Investigations by the Swedish, Danish and German authorities have not yet determined who is responsible.

Mutual accusations

At the time of the incident, the pipelines were out of service but contained significant amounts of methane gas. Western countries had accused Russia of being responsible for these explosions, adding to the anger aimed at Moscow after the launch of its offensive in Ukraine. Russia had accused the “Anglo-Saxons” of being behind this sabotage.

The United States denies the accusations

In a recent article, American investigative journalist Seymour Hersh wrote that U.S. Navy divers, aided by Norway, allegedly planted explosives on these pipelines in June, triggering their explosion three months later. The United States called the information “totally false”.

Exacerbated geopolitical tensions

Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the two pipelines have been at the heart of geopolitical tensions, fanned after Moscow’s decision to cut off gas supplies to Europe in alleged retaliation for Western sanctions. The revelation of the possible involvement of a “pro-Ukrainian group” in the sabotage only aggravates the tensions between the two countries, and complicates the investigations to determine the responsibilities in this incident.

Russia continues hydrocarbon deliveries to India and explores new outlets for liquefied natural gas, amid escalating trade tensions with the United States.
Azerbaijani energy infrastructure targeted in Ukraine raises concerns over the security of gas flows between Baku and Kyiv, just as a new supply agreement has been signed.
The suspension of 1,400 MW of electricity supplied by Iran to Iraq puts pressure on the Iraqi grid, while Tehran records a record 77 GW demand and must balance domestic consumption with regional obligations.
Beijing opposes the possible return of European trio sanctions against Iran, as the nuclear deal deadline approaches and diplomatic tensions rise around Tehran.
The United States plans to collaborate with Pakistan on critical minerals and hydrocarbons, exploring joint ventures and projects in strategic areas such as Balochistan.
Around 80 Russian technical standards for oil and gas have been internationally validated, notably by the United Arab Emirates, Algeria and Oman, according to the Institute of Oil and Gas Technological Initiatives.
Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
The two countries end 37 years of conflict with a 43-kilometer corridor under American control for 99 years. The infrastructure will transport 50 million tons of goods annually by 2030.
A senior official from the UN agency begins technical discussions with Iran on Monday, the first meeting since June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
Consent Preferences