Lukoil sanctions do not affect Slovak security for Ukraine

Denys Shmyhal, Prime Minister of Ukraine, assures us that the sanctions against Lukoil do not compromise Slovakia's energy security and have the full support of the European Union.

Share:

Sanctions ukrainiennes Lukoil

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Ukrainian sanctions banning the transit of oil from Russian producer Lukoil are causing concern in Eastern Europe.
However, Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal insists that these sanctions do not compromise Slovakia’s energy security.
There are no plans to lift the sanctions, which have the full support of the European Union.
These sanctions, introduced at the end of June, aimed to ban all Lukoil activity in Ukraine, including the transit of its oil to refineries in Slovakia and Hungary.
It was only in mid-July that concerns about diesel supplies were expressed by these countries.

Reactions from the countries concerned

In response, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico threatened to halt diesel deliveries to Ukraine unless Russian oil transit via Lukoil was restored.
Shmyhal insisted, however, that Slovakia remains a reliable partner, and that no threats or blackmail would be accepted.
He asserted that the sanctions did not jeopardize Slovakia’s energy security, nor that of Europe as a whole.
The Druzhba pipeline, essential for refineries in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary, continues to operate despite the ongoing conflict.
This pipeline is a major channel for Russian exports, mainly via Rosneft, Lukoil and Tatneft.

Stable oil flows

Ukrtransnafta, the Ukrainian oil transport company, confirms that no oil belonging to Lukoil is transiting Ukrainian territory after the sanctions came into force.
Oleksiy Chernyshov, head of Naftogaz, corroborates this information, assuring us that transit volumes remain stable despite the absence of Lukoil oil.
This situation demonstrates Ukraine’s ability to manage its sanctions while maintaining constant oil flows, thus minimizing the impact on its European partners.
The complex energy relations between Ukraine, Russia and Europe underline the importance of continued coordination and solidarity within the European Union.
With these measures, Ukraine is asserting its sovereignty while strengthening its strategic alliances with its European neighbors.
The handling of the sanctions against Lukoil illustrates the resilience and adaptability of European energy infrastructures in the face of major geopolitical disruptions.

A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Consent Preferences