Iraqi hydrocarbons: Baghdad-Erbil bill fast-tracked

Faced with the suspension of Kurdistan's oil exports since March and tensions over production and revenue sharing, Baghdad and Erbil set about creating a committee to draft an oil and gas law. This initiative seeks to resolve these disputes, which have an impact on Iraqi oil production and the Mediterranean market.

Share:

Pétrole et gaz irakien

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Iraq’s federal government in Baghdad and the semi-autonomous Kurdistan region are to set up a committee to draft an oil and gas law to help resolve a dispute over oil production and revenue sharing that has escalated into a suspension of exports from the north via Turkey since March 25.

Crucial Baghdad-Erbil meeting on Iraqi hydrocarbons bill

Delegates from the Baghdad and Erbil governments met on August 5 to discuss the drafting of the bill, in accordance with Prime Minister Mohammed al-Sudani’s instructions, the Federal Oil Ministry said in a statement. The meeting was attended by the federal government’s ministers of oil and foreign affairs, with the participation of a Kurdish delegation and representatives of the oil-producing provinces, among other officials, the ministry said in the August 5 statement.

The meeting participants stressed the need to speed up the drafting of the oil and gas bill, with the participation of the Kurdistan Regional Government and the oil-producing provinces, the ministry added. The meeting’s recommendations include the formation of a committee to monitor the drafting of the oil and gas bill and the presentation of a working paper based on the opinions of Sudani, the Kurdistan Regional Government and the oil-producing provinces in order to finalize the bill, according to the statement. Spokesmen for the Kurdistan Regional Government could not immediately be reached for comment on the outcome of the August 5 meeting.

Iraqi hydrocarbon exports halted: Dispute between Baghdad, Erbil and Ankara

The dispute between Baghdad and Erbil over oil production and revenue sharing escalated in March, when an international tribunal ruled against independent oil exports from Kurdistan under its own 2007 law, prompting Turkey to halt oil exports to northern Iraq via its port of Ceyhan. Since March 25, more than 450,000 b/d of oil normally shipped to the Mediterranean have remained out of service due to persistent problems between Baghdad, Erbil and Ankara concerning the resumption of flows.

The suspension of exports to the north via Ceyhan has led Iraq to produce oil below its OPEC+ quota of 4.22 million b/d since May, when it began implementing voluntary cuts. OPEC’s second-largest producer pumped 4.13 million b/d in June, according to the latest S&P Global Commodity Insights survey.

Impact on the Mediterranean market of the conflict over Iraqi hydrocarbons in Kurdistan

Since 2007, the Kurdistan Regional Government has marketed its crude oil independently, until an international arbitration ruling in March declared that sales via Ceyhan violated a bilateral agreement between Turkey and Iraq. As a result, the Mediterranean market was deprived of its normally abundant supply of sour crude, as operators in Kurdistan had to turn off the taps when crude storage facilities reached maximum capacity.

Baghdad claims that its right to export all Iraqi oil is supported by the decision of the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce of March 23, which has not been made public, making it difficult to verify the various assertions of both sides on the content of this decision. A temporary agreement between the Baghdad and Erbil governments on April 4 had raised hopes of a resumption of flows, but Ankara has still not indicated when it will resume exports.

Constitutional interpretation, budget conflict and the Iraqi Hydrocarbons Law of 2007

In addition to the stalemate in oil production and exports, Erbil is contesting the sharing of oil revenues between Baghdad and the semi-autonomous region following the approval, in June, of fiscal budgets for 2023, 2024 and 2025. The budget, which includes controversial amendments decried by Kurdish officials, calls for $152 billion in spending, spread over the three years.

For Kurdistan, the budget law essentially obliges the region to hand over 400,000 b/d of its crude oil production, its main source of revenue, to the state-owned oil marketing company SOMO in order to receive the 12.6% federal funding it has been granted. The oil dispute between Erbil and Baghdad stems from the interpretation of the 2005 constitution, with differences over the meaning of articles relating to oil and gas production and revenue sharing.

In 2007, Erbil and Baghdad began trying to draft a comprehensive oil and gas law for all regions of Iraq, but over the years several versions have been presented, which have never been submitted to parliament. In the midst of the dispute over the interpretation of the constitution, Kurdistan moved forward in 2007 by drafting its own oil and gas law and signing agreements with international oil companies to export its crude via Ceyhan, much to the annoyance of the federal government.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences