Iran resumes nuclear talks with Europe under mounting US pressure

Iranian officials met in Istanbul with the European trio to discuss the nuclear programme, as Washington threatens new sanctions in case of deadlock.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Iran held discussions in Istanbul with Germany, France and the United Kingdom regarding the status of its civil nuclear programme, amid renewed diplomatic tensions with the United States. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi stated that the exchanges focused on lifting economic sanctions and indirect negotiations between Tehran and Washington.

The meeting followed a fourth round of US-Iran talks mediated by Oman, aiming to establish a new agreement regulating Iran’s uranium enrichment capacities. Since the United States’ unilateral withdrawal from the 2015 agreement, restrictions on Iran’s nuclear programme have become ineffective, generating legal uncertainty around its regulatory framework.

European dialogue and US warnings

Christian Turner, Political Director at the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, confirmed that the participants in Istanbul expressed their willingness to continue discussions and welcomed the ongoing efforts between Iran and the United States. Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with his European counterparts to discuss developments in the Iranian dossier, stressing the need for a legally binding framework.

US President Donald Trump, during a visit to the Middle East, stated that Iran must “act quickly” to avoid unspecified consequences, claiming that a “written proposal” had been delivered to Tehran. However, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi denied the existence of such a document, refuting any direct or indirect receipt of an official offer.

Iranian conditions for a new deal

Iranian authorities declared their openness to a verifiable commitment, including a ban on nuclear weapons production, the elimination of highly enriched uranium stocks exceeding civilian thresholds, and the admission of international inspectors to its facilities. In return, Tehran demands the immediate lifting of punitive economic measures imposed since the collapse of the Vienna agreement.

Uranium enrichment remains at the heart of the disagreement. Iran is currently enriching uranium at 60%, far above the 3.67% limit set by the 2015 accord but still below the 90% threshold for military use. Iranian officials indicated they would be willing to temporarily reduce both the level and volume of enrichment if sanctions were lifted.

Europe ready to reinstate sanctions

At the end of April, French Minister Jean-Noël Barrot stated that the E3 group would not hesitate to trigger the “snapback” mechanism outlined in the 2015 agreement, which allows for the automatic reinstatement of international sanctions if Iran threatens regional security. This measure remains one of the few functional regulatory levers under the current multilateral framework.

In a recently published op-ed, Abbas Araghchi warned European powers against adopting a confrontational strategy, insisting that Iran remains willing to negotiate within a framework of mutual respect. President Trump, for his part, said he had extended an “olive branch” to Tehran but noted that the offer would not remain on the table indefinitely.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
Consent Preferences