Increased surveillance of Kursk power plant amid Ukrainian offensive

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is monitoring the Kursk nuclear power plant as Ukraine steps up its offensive in the Russian border region.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

The IAEA, headed by Rafael Grossi, is stepping up its inspections of the Kursk nuclear power plant near the Ukrainian border.
The Ukrainian offensive, which began on August 6, 2024, is getting dangerously close to this strategic facility.
Nuclear safety risks are of concern to the international community, as Ukrainian drone fragments are found in the vicinity of the plant.
These developments are forcing the IAEA to maintain heightened vigilance in assessing potential risks.
The Kursk plant, with its RBMK reactors similar to those at Chernobyl, is at the heart of the concerns. Nuclear safety experts stress the need to protect this infrastructure, while minimizing the risk of a catastrophe.
The IAEA is calling for maximum restraint on all sides to prevent any incident with potentially serious consequences.

Strategic and security implications

Due to its geographical position, the Kursk region is of strategic importance for both Ukrainian and Russian forces.
For Ukraine, the aim is to create a buffer zone, limiting Russia’s ability to conduct military operations on its territory.
On the Russian side, the protection of critical infrastructure, such as nuclear power plants, is a priority.
Nuclear security is therefore becoming a major issue, requiring enhanced international coordination.
Experts point out that, despite improvements in reactor safety since Chernobyl, the threat of a nuclear incident cannot be totally ruled out.
Spent fuel storage facilities, in particular, represent potential targets in the event of an escalation of the conflict.
The IAEA, as an independent authority, plays a key role in monitoring and assessing risks in this complex situation.

Impact on energy security

The situation at Kursk also raises questions about energy security in wartime.
Protecting nuclear power plants is essential to avoid disruptions to energy supplies, which could have far-reaching repercussions.
Current events demonstrate the fragility of critical infrastructures in the face of armed conflict, underlining the need for robust strategies to guarantee their security.
The IAEA’s actions are aimed at averting a major energy crisis, while maintaining regional stability.
The Ukrainian and Russian authorities are aware of the risks associated with any attack on nuclear facilities, but the dynamics of the conflict demand continued vigilance.
The assessment underway at Kursk is therefore crucial to prevent any deterioration in the situation.

The International Atomic Energy Agency warns that little time remains to reach an agreement with Iran on fully resuming inspections, as European sanctions could be reimposed within 30 days.
Slovenia’s JEK2 project moves forward with two nuclear technologies judged technically compatible, estimated between EUR9.31bn ($10.1bn) and EUR15.37bn ($16.66bn).
US-based Oklo will build the country’s first privately funded nuclear fuel recycling centre in Oak Ridge, investing $1.7bn and creating over 800 jobs.
The Tennessee Valley Authority partners with ENTRA1 Energy to develop up to 6 gigawatts of modular nuclear capacity, in an unprecedented project supporting energy growth across seven U.S. states.
A report by the International Atomic Energy Agency puts Iran’s 60% enriched uranium at 440.9 kg before Israeli and U.S. strikes, while the agency’s access to enrichment sites has remained suspended since the operations.
US-based Westinghouse has signed six industrial agreements in the UK to supply critical components for its AP1000 and AP300 nuclear projects in Britain and abroad.
NANO Nuclear Energy receives direct funding from the US Air Force innovation branch to assess the integration of its KRONOS MMRâ„¢ microreactor at the Washington D.C. military base.
EDF extends the operation of Heysham 1 and Hartlepool by one year after favourable safety inspections, ensuring continuity of nuclear production and safeguarding more than 1,000 jobs.
Russian nuclear group Rosatom has confirmed advanced discussions with India and Turkey to launch new power plants, including advanced and floating reactor technologies.
The International Atomic Energy Agency has identified uranium particles of industrial origin in samples taken from a Syrian site suspected of hosting an undeclared nuclear reactor.
Norwegian authorities begin the first regulatory phase for two modular nuclear reactor projects, marking a strategic step in the national review of the potential role of nuclear energy in the country’s power mix.
With eleven reactors under construction and major projects such as Jaitapur, India is preparing a nuclear build-up that could place it among the world’s five leading nations in the sector.
France and Germany have validated a joint energy roadmap, including a commitment to the non-discrimination of nuclear energy in European financing.
Russia and Iran seek to strengthen their nuclear cooperation as the E3 activates the sanctions mechanism against Tehran, reigniting tensions over compliance with the 2015 Vienna agreement.
US-based Natura Resources has secured strategic funding and key permits for its MSR-1 nuclear reactor, backed by public funds and enriched fuel allocation from the Department of Energy.
The United States and South Korea have agreed to initiate discussions on reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, marking a potential strategic shift in the long-standing bilateral agreement.
The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission has granted a 40-year extension for the AP1000 reactor design certification, supporting its long-term construction domestically and deployment abroad.
Nano Nuclear Energy has signed a memorandum of understanding with Dioxitek, Argentina’s only uranium supplier for nuclear fuel, to assess the development of local conversion and enrichment capacities.
Stockholm plans to restart uranium extraction by lifting the 2018 ban, aiming to secure strategic supply chains and support domestic nuclear electricity production.
The French Atomic Energy Commission has signed a letter of intent with start-up Calogena to study the installation of a 30 MW thermal small nuclear reactor at its Cadarache site.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.