IAEA: Increased risks for Kursk and Zaporizhzhzhia nuclear power plants

Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), warns of threats to the Kursk and Zaporizhia nuclear power plants, which are exposed to military tensions in Russia and Ukraine.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

Fighting in Ukraine and Russia raises major nuclear safety concerns.
The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, expresses his concerns about the Kursk power plant in Russia and the Zaporijjia power plant in Ukraine.
These plants are located in areas of intense military confrontation, and their safety is under threat.
At a meeting in Kaliningrad, Rafael Grossi described the situation at the Kursk plant as “alarming”.
The two reactors currently operating on this site have no specific protection against possible strikes or accidents linked to the conflict.
Located in a region where Ukrainian forces led an offensive in early August, the Kursk plant could be directly affected by hostilities.
Grossi insists on the need for heightened vigilance and rigorous management to avoid serious incidents.

Direct threats to strategic infrastructures

The Russian-controlled Zaporijjia power plant remains the focus of concern.
Recent damage to a cooling tower has highlighted the site’s vulnerability.
While Moscow accuses Ukraine of orchestrating the attack via drones, Kiev denies any involvement.
This facility, the largest in Europe, is regularly targeted, with each side blaming the other for incidents.
The stakes are clear: guaranteeing nuclear safety in a context of conflict requires precise and rigorous management.
The Kursk and Zaporizhia facilities are critical infrastructures whose safety is crucial not only for the countries in conflict, but also for the entire European region.

International Coordination and Follow-up

Rafael Grossi calls for continuous monitoring of nuclear sites in conflict zones.
He asserts that power plants must never become military targets, insisting on compliance with international conventions on the subject.
Discussions with Rosatom’s Alexei Likhatchev show agreement on the possibility of sending IAEA experts to sites in the event of an immediate threat.
The situation calls for coordinated action and total transparency between the parties involved.
The slightest failure in communication or safety could have serious consequences for the environment and the population.
The Kursk plant, although “operating normally” according to Rosatom, remains under strict observation by the IAEA.
Any change in the fighting near these facilities will require rapid intervention.

Risk Management and Preparedness for Extreme Scenarios

Rapidly changing military situations around these power plants mean that we need to be prepared for extreme crisis scenarios.
Safety protocols need to be adapted in line with developments in the field.
The IAEA’s role remains central to assessing threats in real time and ensuring that appropriate measures are put in place.
Rafael Grossi’s recent announcements on the situation at Kursk and Zaporizhjia underline the need for ongoing dialogue and enhanced cooperation between the IAEA and local authorities.
The current geopolitical context leaves no margin for error.
Nuclear safety in these conflict regions is an urgent priority, requiring ongoing efforts and dedicated resources.

The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.
Several international agencies have echoed warnings by Teresa Ribera, Vice-President of the European Commission, about commercial risks related to Chinese competition, emphasizing the EU's refusal to engage in a price war.
Consent Preferences