Gas dispute with P&ID: Nigeria wins

A London court puts an end to an eleven-billion-dollar gas dispute.

Share:

nigéria ville

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The gas dispute with P&ID (Process and Industrial Developments Limited) was resolved in Nigeria’s favor after a London court ruling on October 23, 2023. This decision has major implications for Nigeria‘s finances and energy. However, it illustrates the complexities of the international gas sector.

The aborted Gas Agreement

The dispute dates back to 2010, when P&ID, a small company registered in the British Virgin Islands, was commissioned to build a state-of-the-art gas processing plant in southeast Nigeria, intended to generate electricity. However, the project was never realized, and P&ID accused the Nigerian government of violating the original agreement.

Arbitration decision in favor of P&ID

In 2017, a London arbitration tribunal ruled in P&ID’s favor. He awarded the company $6.6 billion in damages. In August 2019, the company secured the seizure of $9.6 billion in Nigerian assets, equivalent to around a fifth of the foreign currency reserves of the country of 200 million people. With interest, the sum claimed had reached over eleven billion dollars.

The Nigerian government’s reaction

The Nigerian government, under President Muhammadu Buhari, appealed and obtained a stay of execution of the decision, subject to the payment of a $200 million guarantee to P&ID. The government alleged “bribes, corruption and perjury” in the original gas agreement and arbitration proceedings.

The Historical Judgment in Favour of Nigeria

On Monday, a London commercial court finally ruled in Nigeria’s favor, declaring that the arbitration awards had been obtained by fraud. Judge Robin Knowles pointed out that this case was an example of what some people are prepared to do out of greed, jeopardizing the interests of the Nigerian people.

Implications and repercussions

Nigerian President Bola Ahmed Tinubu described the ruling as “historic” and stressed its importance for developing countries. He added that this victory prevented private companies and corrupt officials from holding nations hostage.

A Lesson for International Gas Agreements

This decision by the London court marks a significant turning point in the gas dispute between Nigeria and P&ID. It raises important questions about the protection of national interests in complex international agreements. It also highlights the potential consequences of corruption in the energy sector. The outcome of this case will have financial and energy repercussions for Nigeria. This will serve as a precedent for other international disputes of this nature.

Final Analysis

The London court’s decision in the gas dispute between Nigeria and P&ID is a major event. It demonstrates that fraud and corruption cannot prevail in international agreements. This case is an example of the complex issues facing developing countries when dealing with private companies. The landmark ruling is a strong signal in favor of defending national interests and fighting corruption. It also strengthens confidence in the international legal system. For Nigeria, this victory has considerable financial implications and strengthens its position in the energy sector. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in international gas agreements. Nigeria’s victory is a step forward for all developing countries facing similar disputes. It stresses the need to preserve national resources and ensure that trade agreements are fair and transparent. The London ruling is a victory for Nigeria. The same goes for Africa and developing countries around the world. Ultimately, this case highlights the crucial importance of integrity and justice in the energy sector, and reminds us all that greed and corruption must not take precedence over the public interest. Nigeria can now continue on its path towards a more equitable and transparent gas sector.
The Khor Mor gas field, operated by Pearl Petroleum, was hit by an armed drone, halting production and causing power outages affecting 80% of Kurdistan’s electricity capacity.
Global South Utilities is investing $1 billion in new solar, wind and storage projects to strengthen Yemen's energy capacity and expand its regional influence.
British International Investment and FirstRand partner to finance the decarbonisation of African companies through a facility focused on supporting high-emission sectors.
Budapest moves to secure Serbian oil supply, threatened by Croatia’s suspension of crude flows following US sanctions on the Russian-controlled NIS refinery.
Moscow says it wants to increase oil and liquefied natural gas exports to Beijing, while consolidating bilateral cooperation amid US sanctions targeting Russian producers.
The European Investment Bank is mobilising €2bn in financing backed by the European Commission for energy projects in Africa, with a strategic objective rooted in the European Union’s energy diplomacy.
Russia faces a structural decline in energy revenues as strengthened sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil disrupt trade flows and deepen the federal budget deficit.
Washington imposes new sanctions targeting vessels, shipowners and intermediaries in Asia, increasing the regulatory risk of Iranian oil trade and redefining maritime compliance in the region.
OFAC’s licence for Paks II circumvents sanctions on Rosatom in exchange for US technological involvement, reshaping the balance of interests between Moscow, Budapest and Washington.
Finland, Estonia, Hungary and Czechia are multiplying bilateral initiatives in Africa to capture strategic energy and mining projects under the European Global Gateway programme.
The Brazilian president calls for a voluntary and non-binding energy transition during COP30 in Belém, avoiding direct confrontation with oil-producing countries.
The region attracted only a small share of global capital allocated to renewables in 2024, despite high energy needs and ambitious development goals, according to a report published in November.
The United States approves South Korea’s development of civilian uranium enrichment capabilities and supports a nuclear-powered submarine project, expanding a strategic partnership already linked to a major trade agreement.
The EU member states agree to prioritise a loan mechanism backed by immobilised Russian assets to finance aid to Ukraine, reducing national budgetary impact while ensuring enhanced funding capacity.
The Canadian government commits $56 billion to a new wave of infrastructure projects aimed at expanding energy corridors, accelerating critical mineral extraction and reinforcing strategic capacity.
Berlin strengthens its cooperation with Abuja through funding aimed at supporting Nigeria’s energy diversification and consolidating its renewable infrastructure.
COP30 begins in Belém under uncertainty, as countries fail to agree on key discussion topics, highlighting deep divisions over climate finance and the global energy transition.
The United States secures a tungsten joint venture in Kazakhstan and mining protocols in Uzbekistan, with financing envisaged from the Export-Import Bank of the United States and shipment routed via the Trans-Caspian corridor.
The United States grants Hungary a one-year waiver on sanctions targeting Russian oil, in return for a commitment to purchase US liquefied natural gas worth $600mn.
Meeting in Canada, G7 energy ministers unveiled a series of projects aimed at securing supply chains for critical minerals, in response to China’s restrictions on rare earth exports.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.