EU suspends 93 billion euros in tariffs against Washington

Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

The European Commission announced Monday, August 4, the six-month suspension of its 93 billion euro counter-tariff measures that were set to take effect August 7 against the United States. This decision comes as Brussels and Washington work to finalize the terms of their trade agreement reached July 27 between Ursula von der Leyen and Donald Trump. Commission spokesperson for trade Olof Gill confirmed that the European Union (EU) was continuing negotiations with the United States to finalize a joint statement, while emphasizing that this suspension aimed to restore stability and predictability for citizens and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.

The framework agreement provides for a single 15% tariff on most European goods exported to the United States, notably including the automotive sector which sees its customs duties reduced from 27.5% to 15%. This measure nevertheless represents a substantial increase from the average rate of 1.2% in effect before the Trump presidency. The aerospace sector and certain chemical products benefit from exemptions, while tariffs on steel and aluminum remain at 50%.

Major economic impact on both economies

Economic projections reveal significant consequences for both trading blocs. European gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to contract by 0.3% while the American economy could suffer a more marked decline of 0.7% in a scenario without a final agreement. Germany, Europe’s leading export-dependent economy, faces an anticipated contraction of 0.4% of its GDP. American households will bear an average additional cost of $1,300 in 2025, with particularly pronounced price increases in clothing (+38%), automobiles (+12% or $5,800 more per new vehicle) and food (+3.3%).

The employment impact also appears concerning with a potential loss of 497,000 jobs in the United States by the end of 2025 and an unemployment rate increase of 0.7 percentage points by the end of 2026. Ireland appears as the most vulnerable European country in terms of employment, followed by Italy, particularly exposed in the transport and fashion sectors.

Colossal financial commitments and European divisions

The agreement includes massive financial commitments from the EU: $750 billion in purchases of American energy products (liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels) spread over three years, as well as $600 billion in additional investments in the United States by 2028. These amounts raise questions about their feasibility, as the EU has no authority to compel private companies to make such purchases. The European Commission has moreover emphasized the political and “not legally binding” nature of this agreement.

Divisions among member states remain palpable. While Germany favors a quick agreement to protect its automotive industry, France strongly criticizes the “unbalanced” nature of the deal. French Prime Minister François Bayrou called the agreement a “dark day” for Europe, accusing Brussels of having yielded to the American president. The Netherlands adopts a pragmatic position while Italy considers the 15% rate “sustainable” for its economy.

Strategic sectors under high tension

The pharmaceutical sector, representing $127 billion in American imports from the EU in 2024, remains in uncertainty with an ongoing Section 232 investigation that could result in additional tariffs. This situation generates potential costs of $100 million per day in new tariffs for American companies. Ireland finds itself particularly exposed, with pharmaceutical exports representing 55% of its total exports to the United States. Popular weight-loss drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy, using semaglutide produced by Novo Nordisk, are among the potentially impacted products.

The European automotive industry faces considerable challenges despite the obtained tariff reduction. Manufacturers BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen and Volvo, which generate a significant share of their sales in the United States, will have to absorb substantial additional costs. The machinery and equipment sector, including $37 billion in imported medical instruments, also remains under pressure.

European retaliation arsenal on hold

Brussels maintains a substantial arsenal of retaliatory measures in reserve. Beyond the 21 billion euros in countermeasures suspended until August 6, the Commission has prepared a second series of tariffs targeting 72 billion euros worth of American products, including 11 billion euros in aircraft and parts, as well as emblematic products like bourbon, jeans and Harley-Davidson motorcycles. The anti-coercion instrument, considered the EU’s commercial nuclear option, remains on the negotiating table with growing support from member states for its potential deployment.

The American executive order of July 31 confirming the application of the 15% tariff from August 8 establishes that this rate includes existing most-favored-nation rates, thus avoiding tariff stacking beyond the 15% ceiling. This measure offers immediate tariff relief compared to the duties announced on April 2, but nevertheless represents a historic increase in the average American effective tariff rate to 18.3%, the highest level since 1934.

Negotiations continue in a context where the American trade deficit with the EU reached $235.6 billion in 2024. Uncertainties persist notably on the concrete implementation modalities of European financial commitments and the actual duration of the agreement beyond the initial six-month suspension. The risk of Chinese export diversion to the European market and increased fragmentation of global supply chains add additional complexity to the transatlantic trade equation.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.
Athens and Tripoli engage in a negotiation process to define their exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean, amid geopolitical tensions and underwater energy stakes.
European powers demand concrete steps from Tehran on nuclear issue or United Nations sanctions will be reinstated, as IAEA inspections remain blocked and tensions with Washington persist.
Brussels confirms its target to end all Russian energy imports by 2028, despite growing diplomatic pressure from Washington amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump threatens to escalate US sanctions against Russia, but only if NATO member states stop all Russian oil imports, which remain active via certain pipelines.
The two countries agreed to develop infrastructure dedicated to liquefied natural gas to strengthen Europe's energy security and boost transatlantic trade.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.
Brazil’s Cop 30 presidency aims to leverage the Dubai commitments to mobilise public and private actors despite ongoing deadlock in international negotiations.