COP29: Options are becoming clearer for the global finance agreement

Discussions at COP29 in Baku are advancing on the climate finance goal, with three options on the table to determine contributions from wealthy countries to developing nations.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

The formulation of the climate finance goal for developing countries, to be adopted in November at COP29 in Baku, is becoming slightly clearer according to a draft agreement published on Tuesday. However, the amount required from wealthy countries remains to be defined.

Three formulation options are now on the table in this text drafted by Egypt and Australia, designated as co-facilitators seeking to synthesize years of North-South disputes. The first option favors exclusive aid from developed countries, while the second proposes a sharing of responsibilities that includes wealthy emerging countries. The third option combines both approaches.

These proposals include several possibilities for quantification and distribution of the billions of dollars expected to establish this new global finance goal for climate, referred to by its English acronym NCQG (New Collective Quantified Goal). This goal is expected to be approved at the 29th United Nations climate conference, which will take place from November 11 to 22 under Azerbaijani presidency.

Options for Climate Finance Formulation

The first option imposes on wealthy countries, recognized as historically responsible for climate change in the UN Climate Convention, a commitment to provide an annual amount ranging from a minimum of $100 billion to $2 trillion over a yet-to-be-determined period. Proposed periods include 2025-2030 or until 2035.

The second approach proposes setting the NCQG “onion-style,” with several layers. It first envisions a total funding goal for developing countries to be achieved by 2035 or 2040, funded by all public and private sources, national and international. Subsequently, sub-goals would specifically require developed countries to contribute more.

Implications and Challenges of Proposed Options

However, the second option does not provide any indication of the additional effort that wealthy countries would be willing to accept, leaving room for interpretation regarding actual contributions. The third option, less detailed, would aim to combine elements from the first two, seeking a balance between exclusive aid and shared responsibilities.

According to Ialtchine Rafiev, Azerbaijan’s chief negotiator, the financial needs for public funding are in the order of trillions of dollars, with a realistic mobilization estimated at several hundred billion. These remarks were made following two days of “pre-COP” meetings in Baku, highlighting the importance of an ambitious yet achievable agreement.

History and Objectives of Climate Finance

The climate finance goal under discussion replaces the one set in 2009, which stipulated that wealthy countries provide $100 billion in annual aid to developing countries. This amount was difficult to achieve by 2022, underscoring the need for a new, more ambitious, and better-structured agreement.

Current discussions aim to define a stronger and fairer financial framework capable of effectively addressing the growing needs of developing countries in the face of climate challenges. COP29 represents a crucial step in establishing this goal, with intense negotiations among stakeholders.

US utilities anticipate a rapid increase in high-intensity loads, targeting 147 GW of new capacity by 2035, with a strategic shift toward deregulated markets.
France opens a national consultation on RTE’s plan to invest €100 billion by 2040 to modernise the high-voltage electricity transmission grid.
Governor Gavin Newsom orders state agencies to fast-track clean energy projects to capture Inflation Reduction Act credits before deadlines expire.
Germany’s energy transition could cost up to €5.4tn ($6.3tn) by 2049, according to the main industry organisation, raising concerns over national competitiveness.
Facing blackouts imposed by the authorities, small businesses in Iran record mounting losses amid drought, fuel shortages and pressure on the national power grid.
Russian group T Plus plans to stabilise its electricity output at 57.6 TWh in 2025, despite a decline recorded in the first half of the year, according to Chief Executive Officer Pavel Snikkars.
In France, the Commission de régulation de l’énergie issues a clarification on ten statements shared over the summer, correcting several figures regarding tariffs, production and investments in the electricity sector.
A group of 85 researchers challenges the scientific validity of the climate report released by the US Department of Energy, citing partial methods and the absence of independent peer review.
Five energy infrastructure projects have been added to the list of cross-border renewable projects, making them eligible for financial support under the CEF Energy programme.
The Kuwaiti government has invited three international consortia to submit bids for the first phase of the Al Khairan project, combining power generation and desalination.
Nigeria’s state-owned oil company abandons plans to sell the Port Harcourt refinery and confirms a maintenance programme despite high operating costs.
The publication of the Multiannual Energy Programme decree, awaited for two years, is compromised by internal political tensions, jeopardising strategic investments in nuclear and renewables.
The US Energy Information Administration reschedules or cancels several publications, affecting the availability of critical data for oil, gas and renewables markets.
Brazilian authorities have launched a large-scale operation targeting a money laundering system linked to the fuel sector, involving investment funds, fintechs, and more than 1,000 service stations across the country.
A national study by the Davies Group reveals widespread American support for the simultaneous development of both renewable and fossil energy sources, with strong approval for natural gas and solar energy.
The South Korean government compels ten petrochemical groups to cut up to 3.7 million tons of naphtha cracking per year, tying financial and tax support to swift and documented restructuring measures.
The U.S. Department of Energy has extended until November the emergency measures aimed at ensuring the stability of Puerto Rico’s power grid against overload risks and recurring outages.
Under threat of increased U.S. tariffs, New Delhi is accelerating its energy independence strategy to reduce reliance on imports, particularly Russian oil.
With a new $800 million investment agreement, Tsingshan expands the Manhize steel plant and generates an energy demand of more than 500 MW, forcing Zimbabwe to accelerate its electricity strategy.
U.S. electric storage capacity will surge 68% this year according to Cleanview, largely offsetting the slowdown in solar and wind projects under the Trump administration.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.