COP29: Options are becoming clearer for the global finance agreement

Discussions at COP29 in Baku are advancing on the climate finance goal, with three options on the table to determine contributions from wealthy countries to developing nations.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The formulation of the climate finance goal for developing countries, to be adopted in November at COP29 in Baku, is becoming slightly clearer according to a draft agreement published on Tuesday. However, the amount required from wealthy countries remains to be defined.

Three formulation options are now on the table in this text drafted by Egypt and Australia, designated as co-facilitators seeking to synthesize years of North-South disputes. The first option favors exclusive aid from developed countries, while the second proposes a sharing of responsibilities that includes wealthy emerging countries. The third option combines both approaches.

These proposals include several possibilities for quantification and distribution of the billions of dollars expected to establish this new global finance goal for climate, referred to by its English acronym NCQG (New Collective Quantified Goal). This goal is expected to be approved at the 29th United Nations climate conference, which will take place from November 11 to 22 under Azerbaijani presidency.

Options for Climate Finance Formulation

The first option imposes on wealthy countries, recognized as historically responsible for climate change in the UN Climate Convention, a commitment to provide an annual amount ranging from a minimum of $100 billion to $2 trillion over a yet-to-be-determined period. Proposed periods include 2025-2030 or until 2035.

The second approach proposes setting the NCQG “onion-style,” with several layers. It first envisions a total funding goal for developing countries to be achieved by 2035 or 2040, funded by all public and private sources, national and international. Subsequently, sub-goals would specifically require developed countries to contribute more.

Implications and Challenges of Proposed Options

However, the second option does not provide any indication of the additional effort that wealthy countries would be willing to accept, leaving room for interpretation regarding actual contributions. The third option, less detailed, would aim to combine elements from the first two, seeking a balance between exclusive aid and shared responsibilities.

According to Ialtchine Rafiev, Azerbaijan’s chief negotiator, the financial needs for public funding are in the order of trillions of dollars, with a realistic mobilization estimated at several hundred billion. These remarks were made following two days of “pre-COP” meetings in Baku, highlighting the importance of an ambitious yet achievable agreement.

History and Objectives of Climate Finance

The climate finance goal under discussion replaces the one set in 2009, which stipulated that wealthy countries provide $100 billion in annual aid to developing countries. This amount was difficult to achieve by 2022, underscoring the need for a new, more ambitious, and better-structured agreement.

Current discussions aim to define a stronger and fairer financial framework capable of effectively addressing the growing needs of developing countries in the face of climate challenges. COP29 represents a crucial step in establishing this goal, with intense negotiations among stakeholders.

A key scientific report by the United Nations Environment Programme failed to gain state approval due to deep divisions over fossil fuels and other sensitive issues.
RTE warns of France’s delay in electrifying energy uses, a key step to limiting fossil fuel imports and supporting its reindustrialisation strategy.
India’s central authority has cancelled 6.3 GW of grid connections for renewable projects since 2022, marking a tightening of regulations and a shift in responsibility back to developers.
The Brazilian government has been instructed to define within two months a plan for the gradual reduction of fossil fuels, supported by a national energy transition fund financed by oil revenues.
The German government may miss the January 2026 deadline to transpose the RED III directive, creating uncertainty over biofuel mandates and disrupting markets.
Italy allocated 82% of the proposed solar and wind capacities in the Fer-X auction, totalling 8.6GW, with competitive purchase prices and a strong concentration of projects in the southern part of the country.
Amid rising public spending, the French government has tasked two experts with reassessing the support scheme for renewable electricity and storage, with proposals expected within three months.
National operator PSE partners with armed forces to protect transformer stations as critical infrastructure faces sabotage linked to foreign interference.
The Norwegian government establishes a commission to anticipate the decline of hydrocarbons and assess economic options for the country in the coming decades.
Kazakhstan plans to allocate 3 GW of wind and solar projects by the end of 2026 through public tenders, with a first 1 GW tranche in 2025, amid efforts to modernise its power system.
Hurricanes Beryl, Helene and Milton accounted for 80% of electricity outages recorded in 2024, marking a ten-year high according to federal data.
The French Energy Regulatory Commission introduces a temporary prudential control on gas and electricity suppliers through a “guichet à blanc” opening in December, pending the transposition of European rules.
The Carney–Smith agreement launches a new pipeline to Asia, removes oil and gas emission caps, and initiates reform of the Pacific north coast tanker ban.
The gradual exit from CfD contracts is turning stable assets into infrastructures exposed to higher volatility, challenging expected returns and traditional financing models for the renewable sector.
The Canadian government introduces major legislative changes to the Energy Efficiency Act to support its national strategy and adapt to the realities of digital commerce.
Quebec becomes the only Canadian province where a carbon price still applies directly to fuels, as Ottawa eliminated the public-facing carbon tax in April 2025.
New Delhi launches a 72.8 bn INR incentive plan to build a 6,000-tonne domestic capacity for permanent magnets, amid rising Chinese export restrictions on critical components.
The rise of CfDs, PPAs and capacity mechanisms signals a structural shift: markets alone no longer cover 10–30-year financing needs, while spot prices have surged 400% in Europe since 2019.
Germany plans to finalise the €5.8bn ($6.34bn) purchase of a 25.1% stake in TenneT Germany to strengthen its control over critical national power grid infrastructure.
The Ghanaian government is implementing a reform of its energy system focused on increasing the use of local natural gas, aiming to reduce electricity production costs and limit the sector's financial imbalance.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.