COP29: China’s Rejection Triggers a Deadlock on Climate Financing

At COP29, China refuses to agree to a climate financing proposal, deepening North-South tensions and threatening global objectives in the fight against climate change.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

7-Day Pass

Up to 50 articles accessible for 7 days, with no automatic renewal

3 $/week*

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles/month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 30,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29), held in Baku, revealed deep disagreements among nations over climate financing. While developing countries demand stronger financial commitments, China, despite its economic influence, refuses any explicit obligations, creating a significant divide with industrialized nations.

A Context of Financial Pressure

Developing countries, united under the G77+China alliance, are demanding a significant increase in climate financing to $500 billion annually. This funding is meant to address three main priorities:

1. Mitigation of emissions: investing in renewable energy and energy efficiency.
2. Adaptation to climate impacts: building resilient and sustainable infrastructure.
3. Loss and damage: compensating countries affected by climate-related disasters such as floods and droughts.

However, this figure represents a major challenge for industrialized nations, already constrained by tight public budgets.

China’s Ambiguous Position

Although part of the G77, China rejected the agreement proposed by the Azerbaijani presidency. Xia Yingxian, the Chinese representative, stated that the text imposed “unacceptable” responsibilities. Beijing maintains that as a “developing country,” it should not be obligated to contribute financially in a mandatory way.

This stance is based on two key arguments:

– Historical responsibility: Industrialized nations, responsible for past emissions, should bear the majority of the financial burden.
– Economic development: China believes it still needs resources to continue its growth and reduce poverty.

However, nations like France and the United States contest this position, emphasizing that China is now the world’s leading emitter of greenhouse gases and the second-largest economy.

North-South Tensions

This disagreement reflects a growing divide between the Global North and the Global South.

– For developed countries: They call for a fairer distribution of contributions, including major emerging economies such as China and India.
– For developing countries: They stress the importance of recognizing the historical responsibilities of industrialized nations in causing the current climate crisis.

Currently, global financial flows related to climate remain insufficient:
– Promised financing: $100 billion per year since 2009.
– Actual funding: $83 billion, much of it in the form of loans, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

Economic and Strategic Implications

The failure of negotiations in Baku could have major repercussions:

1. For Vulnerable Countries
The most exposed nations, particularly in Africa and Pacific islands, risk seeing their climate projects delayed. This would exacerbate global climate and economic inequalities.

2. For the Paris Agreement
The goals of the Paris Agreement, including limiting global warming to 1.5°C, could be jeopardized without adequate financing.

3. For Investors
Businesses and financial institutions are struggling to mobilize funds for low-carbon projects amid uncertainty over international financial flows.

Isolated Initiatives: The Ivorian Example

Despite this stalemate, some countries are taking independent steps. Côte d’Ivoire has announced the creation of a $500 million climate fund to support its energy transition. This initiative shows that vulnerable nations are organizing to compensate for the lack of global consensus, even though their financial capacities remain limited.

What Lies Ahead for Negotiations?

Several scenarios are envisioned to overcome the COP29 stalemate:

1. An Improved Compromise
An agreement could include increased financial commitments from developed countries while clarifying the role of major emerging economies.

2. A Prolonged Deadlock
This would exacerbate geopolitical tensions and slow global climate progress.

3. Technical Measures
Partial implementation of reforms, such as changes to multilateral banks, could limit the negative impacts of the current disagreements.

The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.
Athens and Tripoli engage in a negotiation process to define their exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean, amid geopolitical tensions and underwater energy stakes.
European powers demand concrete steps from Tehran on nuclear issue or United Nations sanctions will be reinstated, as IAEA inspections remain blocked and tensions with Washington persist.
Brussels confirms its target to end all Russian energy imports by 2028, despite growing diplomatic pressure from Washington amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump threatens to escalate US sanctions against Russia, but only if NATO member states stop all Russian oil imports, which remain active via certain pipelines.
The two countries agreed to develop infrastructure dedicated to liquefied natural gas to strengthen Europe's energy security and boost transatlantic trade.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.

All the latest energy news, all the time

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

7 DAY PASS

Up to 50 items can be consulted for 7 days,
without automatic renewal

3$/week*

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.