COP Host Countries Continue Fossil Expansion Despite Climate Goals

The United Arab Emirates, Azerbaijan, and Brazil, hosts of the upcoming COP conferences, plan a 32% increase in fossil fuel production by 2035, despite their commitment to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees.

Share:

Subscribe for unlimited access to all the latest energy sector news.

Over 150 multisector articles and analyses every week.

For less than €3/week*

*For an annual commitment

*Engagement annuel à seulement 99 € (au lieu de 149 €), offre valable jusqu'au 30/07/2025 minuit.

The United Arab Emirates, Azerbaijan, and Brazil, respectively hosts of COP28, COP29, and COP30, have announced an increase in fossil fuel production by 2035. A report by the NGO Oil Change International, published on Wednesday, reveals that these three nations, organizers of global climate summits, plan a collective 32% increase in oil and gas extraction by the same year. This development raises concerns regarding these countries’ real commitment to climate goals, particularly the 1.5-degree warming limit established by the Paris Agreement.

In February, shortly after the conclusion of COP28, the three countries announced their intention to form a “COP presidencies troika” to ensure continuity in climate negotiations and foster increased cooperation. They also committed to incorporating in their national contributions for 2035 emissions reductions compatible with the 1.5-degree target. This pledge was intended to encourage other nations to adopt similar action plans by February 2025.

Climate Commitments Facing Economic Realities

Despite this formal commitment, projected oil and gas production figures contradict these stated objectives. According to data presented in Oil Change International’s report, Brazil plans to increase its fossil fuel production by 36% by 2035 compared to 2023, followed by the United Arab Emirates with a 34% rise, while Azerbaijan shows an estimated 14% increase. This growth in fossil projects directly contravenes the recommendations of the International Energy Agency (IEA), which calls for a 55% global reduction in fossil fuel production to meet climate commitments by 2035.

The NGO also highlighted the need for a strong example from the troika of COP presidencies. According to the organization, while major producing countries like the United States and Canada bear a significant share of responsibility, COP host countries are expected to lead by example in transitioning to cleaner energy sources. Without this commitment from the host countries, global emissions reduction goals could be severely compromised.

A Double Standard Criticized by Oil Change International

The NGO also criticizes Northern countries, responsible for a large share of global emissions due to new oil projects. According to a previous analysis by Oil Change International, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Norway, and Australia would account for nearly half of the additional emissions projected by 2050 from new oil and gas wells. In light of this reality, the NGO argues that an immediate halt to fossil expansion is necessary in wealthier countries as well as in the troika nations.

This double standard between climate commitments made at international conferences and national fossil fuel production policies highlights the contradictions within COP host countries themselves. This situation raises critical questions about the ability of COP summits to drive a rapid and global energy transition.

Toward a Breakdown in Trust within Climate Negotiations

The gap between climate promises and fossil fuel production policies undermines the credibility of COP host countries, according to Oil Change International. By continuing their fossil expansion plans, these countries risk weakening their leadership position in global climate negotiations. For many observers, this inconsistency could harm the spirit of cooperation the COP summits aim to establish, where each nation is expected to contribute to a collective effort.

Thus, as COP29 is set to take place soon in Azerbaijan, the international community is watching closely for concrete climate commitments from these countries. By maintaining their fossil production increase plans, the troika may face heightened pressure to justify these decisions on the global stage, particularly from nations most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.

Baghdad and Damascus intensify discussions to reactivate the 850 km pipeline closed since 2003, offering a Mediterranean alternative amid regional tensions and export blockages.
A free trade agreement between Indonesia and the Eurasian Economic Union is set to be signed in December, aiming to reduce tariffs on $3 bn worth of trade and boost bilateral commerce in the coming years.
The visit of India's national security adviser to Moscow comes as the United States threatens to raise tariffs on New Delhi due to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil.
Brussels freezes its retaliatory measures for six months as July 27 deal imposes 15% duties on European exports.
Discussions between Tehran and Baghdad on export volumes and an $11 billion debt reveal the complexities of energy dependence under U.S. sanctions.
Facing US secondary sanctions threats, Indian refiners slow Russian crude purchases while exploring costly alternatives, revealing complex energy security challenges.
The 50% tariffs push Brasília toward accelerated commercial integration with Beijing and Brussels, reshaping regional economic balances.
Washington imposes massive duties citing Bolsonaro prosecution while exempting strategic sectors vital to US industry.
Sanctions imposed on August 1 accelerate the reconfiguration of Indo-Pacific trade flows, with Vietnam, Bangladesh and Indonesia emerging as principal beneficiaries.
Washington triggers an unprecedented tariff structure combining 25% fixed duties and an additional unspecified penalty linked to Russian energy and military purchases.
Qatar rejects EU climate transition obligations and threatens to redirect its LNG exports to Asia, creating a major energy dilemma.
Uganda is relying on a diplomatic presence in Vienna to facilitate technical and commercial cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, supporting its ambitions in the civil nuclear sector.
The governments of Saudi Arabia and Syria conclude an unprecedented partnership covering oil, gas, electricity interconnection and renewable energies, with the aim of boosting their exchanges and investments in the energy sector.
The European commitment to purchase $250bn of American energy annually raises questions about its technical and economic feasibility in light of limited export capacity.
A major customs agreement sealed in Scotland sets a 15% tariff on most European exports to the United States, accompanied by significant energy purchase commitments and cross-investments between the two powers.
Qatar has warned that it could stop its liquefied natural gas deliveries to the European Union in response to the new European directive on due diligence and climate transition.
The Brazilian mining sector is drawing US attention as diplomatic discussions and tariff measures threaten to disrupt the balance of strategic minerals trade.
Donald Trump has raised the prospect of tariffs on countries buying Russian crude, but according to Reuters, enforcement remains unlikely due to economic risks and unfulfilled past threats.
Afghanistan and Turkmenistan reaffirmed their commitment to deepening their bilateral partnership during a meeting between officials from both countries, with a particular focus on major infrastructure projects and energy cooperation.
The European Union lowers the price cap on Russian crude oil and extends sanctions to vessels and entities involved in circumvention, as coordination with the United States remains pending.
Consent Preferences