COP Host Countries Continue Fossil Expansion Despite Climate Goals

The United Arab Emirates, Azerbaijan, and Brazil, hosts of the upcoming COP conferences, plan a 32% increase in fossil fuel production by 2035, despite their commitment to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees.

Share:

The United Arab Emirates, Azerbaijan, and Brazil, respectively hosts of COP28, COP29, and COP30, have announced an increase in fossil fuel production by 2035. A report by the NGO Oil Change International, published on Wednesday, reveals that these three nations, organizers of global climate summits, plan a collective 32% increase in oil and gas extraction by the same year. This development raises concerns regarding these countries’ real commitment to climate goals, particularly the 1.5-degree warming limit established by the Paris Agreement.

In February, shortly after the conclusion of COP28, the three countries announced their intention to form a “COP presidencies troika” to ensure continuity in climate negotiations and foster increased cooperation. They also committed to incorporating in their national contributions for 2035 emissions reductions compatible with the 1.5-degree target. This pledge was intended to encourage other nations to adopt similar action plans by February 2025.

Climate Commitments Facing Economic Realities

Despite this formal commitment, projected oil and gas production figures contradict these stated objectives. According to data presented in Oil Change International’s report, Brazil plans to increase its fossil fuel production by 36% by 2035 compared to 2023, followed by the United Arab Emirates with a 34% rise, while Azerbaijan shows an estimated 14% increase. This growth in fossil projects directly contravenes the recommendations of the International Energy Agency (IEA), which calls for a 55% global reduction in fossil fuel production to meet climate commitments by 2035.

The NGO also highlighted the need for a strong example from the troika of COP presidencies. According to the organization, while major producing countries like the United States and Canada bear a significant share of responsibility, COP host countries are expected to lead by example in transitioning to cleaner energy sources. Without this commitment from the host countries, global emissions reduction goals could be severely compromised.

A Double Standard Criticized by Oil Change International

The NGO also criticizes Northern countries, responsible for a large share of global emissions due to new oil projects. According to a previous analysis by Oil Change International, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Norway, and Australia would account for nearly half of the additional emissions projected by 2050 from new oil and gas wells. In light of this reality, the NGO argues that an immediate halt to fossil expansion is necessary in wealthier countries as well as in the troika nations.

This double standard between climate commitments made at international conferences and national fossil fuel production policies highlights the contradictions within COP host countries themselves. This situation raises critical questions about the ability of COP summits to drive a rapid and global energy transition.

Toward a Breakdown in Trust within Climate Negotiations

The gap between climate promises and fossil fuel production policies undermines the credibility of COP host countries, according to Oil Change International. By continuing their fossil expansion plans, these countries risk weakening their leadership position in global climate negotiations. For many observers, this inconsistency could harm the spirit of cooperation the COP summits aim to establish, where each nation is expected to contribute to a collective effort.

Thus, as COP29 is set to take place soon in Azerbaijan, the international community is watching closely for concrete climate commitments from these countries. By maintaining their fossil production increase plans, the troika may face heightened pressure to justify these decisions on the global stage, particularly from nations most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.

BRICS adopt a joint financial framework aimed at supporting emerging economies while criticizing European carbon border tax mechanisms, deemed discriminatory and risky for their strategic trade relations.
The European Commission is launching an alliance with member states and industrial players to secure the supply of critical chemicals, amid growing competition from the United States and China.
Trade between Russia and Saudi Arabia grew by over 60% in 2024 to surpass USD 3.8 billion, according to Russian Minister of Industry and Trade Anton Alikhanov, who outlined new avenues for industrial cooperation.
Meeting in Rio, BRICS nations urge global energy market stability, openly condemning Western sanctions and tariff mechanisms in a tense economic and geopolitical context.
Despite strong ties, Iran's dependence on oil revenues limits its ability to secure substantial strategic support from Russia and China amid current international and regional crises, according to several experts.
Egypt’s Electricity Minister engages in new talks with Envision Group, Windey, LONGi, China Energy, PowerChina, and ToNGWEI to boost local industry and attract investments in renewable energy.
The potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz places Gulf producers under intense pressure, highlighting their diplomatic and logistical limitations as a blockage threatens 20 million daily barrels of hydrocarbons destined for global markets.
Budapest and Bratislava jointly reject the European Commission's proposal to ban Russian energy supplies, highlighting significant economic risks and a direct threat to their energy security, days ahead of a key meeting.
Libya officially contests Greece's allocation of offshore oil permits, exacerbating regional tensions over disputed maritime areas south of Crete, rich in hydrocarbons and contested by several Mediterranean states.
Hungary, supported by Slovakia, strongly expresses opposition to the European Commission's plan to phase out imports of Russian energy resources, citing major economic and energy impacts for Central Europe.
Israeli military strikes on Iran's Natanz nuclear site destroyed critical electrical infrastructure but did not reach strategic underground facilities, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The French president travels to Nuuk on 15 June to support Greenlandic sovereignty, review energy projects and respond to recent US pressure, according to the Élysée.
Kazakhstan has selected Rosatom and China National Nuclear Corporation to build two nuclear power plants totaling 2.4 GW, a decision following a favorable referendum and coinciding with Xi Jinping’s upcoming strategic visit.
Israeli strikes against Iranian nuclear sites disrupt US-Iranian talks on the nuclear deal. Tehran now considers canceling the upcoming negotiation round in Oman, heightening regional economic concerns.
Facing alarming breaches of uranium enrichment thresholds by Iran and explicit existential threats, Israel launches targeted military strikes against Iranian nuclear infrastructure, escalating regional tensions dramatically.
The Kremlin has confirmed that Vladimir Putin aims to help resolve the nuclear dispute between the United States and Iran, leveraging strengthened strategic ties with Tehran.
President Lee Jae-myung adopts an energy diplomacy rooted in national interest, amid a complex international landscape of rivalries that could create challenging situations for the country and its energy businesses.
Paris and Warsaw held a bilateral workshop in Warsaw to strengthen coordination on electricity infrastructure investments and supply security under the Nancy Treaty.
Donald Trump firmly rejects any uranium enrichment by Iran, while Russia affirms Tehran’s right to civil nuclear power, intensifying tensions in negotiations over the Iranian nuclear program.
Syria has signed a $7bn agreement with a consortium of companies from Qatar, Turkey and the United States to rebuild its national power sector.