Companies struggle to maintain their investments in decarbonization

Large companies are reducing their investments in decarbonization due to geopolitical tensions, although regulations and consumer expectations continue to push them towards better management of their emissions.

Partagez:

The pressure exerted by international regulations, notably in Europe with the CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive), remains one of the main drivers of decarbonization in the industrial sector.
Despite this, investments in sustainable strategies are declining, reflecting the impact of geopolitical uncertainties.
These regulations are forcing companies to take concrete steps to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and rethink their value chain.
However, it appears that many players are struggling to keep pace with these new obligations.
Indeed, 64% of companies surveyed cited tensions between major powers, notably the USA and China, or conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as reasons for cutting environmental spending.

Reduced capital expenditure despite commitments

The figures are revealing: the share of revenues allocated to decarbonization initiatives has fallen from 0.92% in 2023 to 0.82% in 2024.
This downward trend worries industry observers, especially as emission reduction targets continue to tighten.
Although the majority of the world’s leading companies have affirmed their commitment to meeting their carbon neutrality targets, only 84% of senior executives say they are confident of achieving these goals by the set deadlines.
This reduction in investment contrasts with the growing need to review industrial processes and integrate innovative solutions, such as the use of renewable energies or less energy-intensive manufacturing processes.
The sector is faced with a dilemma: meeting regulatory expectations while coping with an unstable geopolitical environment and increased pressure on margins.

Consumers increasingly skeptical

As far as consumers are concerned, the perception of corporate action on sustainability remains largely negative.
In 2024, 52% of consumers consider sustainability initiatives to be more about greenwashing than real environmental commitment.
This percentage, up from 33% in 2023, shows growing mistrust, particularly among younger generations, who are more sensitive to these issues.
This mistrust could have a direct impact on companies’ brand image and attractiveness.
Executives share this concern.
Over 62% of decision-makers in the sector fear that the initiatives put in place will be perceived as insufficient or opportunistic.
This figure has exploded compared to the previous year, when only 11% of executives felt that these initiatives were poorly perceived by the public.
This trend bears witness to the growing gap between consumer expectations and companies’ ability to effectively communicate their efforts.

European companies face new challenges

In Europe, the implementation of the CSRD directive represents a major challenge for companies, which must publish their first sustainability report in 2025.
Although 75% of the companies concerned see these obligations as positive for their decarbonization strategy, a significant proportion are not yet ready to meet the new requirements.
These new standards not only imply greater transparency, but also greater investment in data collection and compliance.
In addition, the rise of European regulations in the energy sector is forcing companies to review their entire processes.
This includes adjustments in the supply chain, but also in production methods and resource management.
Water management, for example, has become a major issue for 75% of companies in 2024, compared with 55% in 2022, thanks in part to these new regulations.
These measures also reinforce the need for companies to train their employees in these issues, with 73% declaring that they have set up specific training programs.

A slow but necessary adaptation

The industrial sector must adapt to these rapid changes while juggling complex economic and geopolitical priorities.
Companies must meet increasingly stringent regulatory obligations, while trying to maintain profitability in an unstable environment.
Geopolitical tensions, particularly between the USA and China, as well as ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, directly affect companies’ ability to invest in sustainable solutions.
Indeed, supply chains and raw material costs, already under pressure, are feeling the effects of this global instability.
This has the effect of slowing down certain projects that are crucial to achieving the climate targets set by international agreements.
The use of green technologies, renewable energy and energy efficiency are levers which, if properly employed, will enable emissions reduction targets to be met, despite the headwinds.

Frontier Infrastructure Holdings has signed an offtake agreement with manager Wild Assets for up to 120 000 tonnes of BECCS credits, underscoring the voluntary market’s growing appetite for traceable, high-permanence carbon removals.
Global carbon capture and offset credit markets could exceed $1.35 trillion by 2050, driven by private investment, technological advances, and regulatory developments, according to analysis published by Wood Mackenzie.
The Australian carbon credit market is experiencing temporary price stabilization, while the emergence of new alternative financial instruments gradually attracts corporate attention, subtly altering the commercial and financial dynamics of the sector.
Norway has launched a major industrial project aimed at capturing, maritime transport, and geological storage of CO₂, mobilizing key energy players and significant public subsidies to ensure economic viability.
A €21mn European grant, managed by EIB Global, will fund Egyptian projects aimed at cutting industrial emissions and boosting recycling, while a related €135mn loan is expected to raise additional climate investments.
Stockholm Exergi begins construction of a CO₂ capture facility in Stockholm, integrated with the expansion of Northern Lights in Norway, reaching a total storage capacity of 5 million tonnes per year by 2028.
Global emissions coverage by carbon pricing systems reaches 28%, driven by expanding compliance markets, where demand nearly tripled within one year, according to a World Bank report.
Vietnam initiates a pilot carbon market targeting steel, cement, and thermal energy industries to prepare for nationwide regulation starting in 2029.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes granting Texas direct authority to issue carbon dioxide injection permits, potentially accelerating the commercial expansion of geological CO₂ storage projects.
Höegh Evi and Aker BP received Approval in Principle from DNV for a maritime carrier designed to transport liquefied CO₂ to offshore storage sites in Norway.
Norne and the Port of Aalborg begin construction of a 15 mn tonne per year CO2 terminal, supported by an EU grant.
The Lagos State government has launched a programme to deploy 80 million improved cookstoves, generating up to 1.2 billion tonnes of tradable carbon credits.
The US Department of Energy has cancelled 24 projects funded under the Biden administration, citing their lack of profitability and alignment with national energy priorities.
In the United States, the carbon black market faces unprecedented fluctuations in the first half of 2025, driven by declining industrial demand and persistent raw material volatility, casting doubts over the sector's future stability.
European and UK carbon markets paused this week as participants await clarity on future integration of both emissions trading systems.
A consortium led by European Energy has secured prequalification for a Danish carbon capture and storage project in Næstved, aiming to remove 150,000 tons of CO₂ per year under a national subsidy programme.
The joint project by Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners and Vestforbrænding is among ten initiatives selected by the Danish Energy Agency for public carbon capture and storage funding.
Canadian broker One Exchange partners with Stephen Avenue Marketing to create OX CO₂, a carbon trading platform combining digital technology and human expertise.
Russia has filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization (WTO) challenging the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), deeming it discriminatory and protectionist towards its strategic commodity exports.
BP recommends extending the UK emissions trading system through 2042 and calls for alignment with the European market while supporting the inclusion of carbon removals in the scheme.