Companies quietly abandoning their climate targets

Under pressure from markets and politics, companies are readjusting their climate strategies, raising questions about the sincerity of their decarbonization commitments.

Share:

The landscape of corporate climate commitments is changing rapidly.
As political and economic challenges intensify, many companies appear to be recalibrating their sustainability priorities.
Morgan Stanley’s announcement to quietly withdraw its funding target for plastic waste reduction is a case in point.
This phenomenon takes place against a backdrop where, under increasing pressure from investors and politicians, companies are choosing to limit their communication on their environmental commitments.
These readjustments raise questions about the future of the global energy transition.

Recalibrating Sustainability Strategies

Companies are adjusting their sustainability strategies in response to uncertain political and economic contexts.
According to a recent Deloitte survey, 55% of companies in the financial services sector have hired new resources and 50% have adjusted their ESG reporting schedules to improve their reporting capabilities.
However, despite this progress, many remain cautious in making public statements about their climate objectives, fearing possible criticism or political repercussions.
For many companies, the adaptation of ESG (environmental, social and governance) strategies is also influenced by pressure from institutional investors.
A 2024 survey shows that 89% of investors now include ESG criteria in their investment decisions, putting increased pressure on companies to demonstrate concrete progress towards their sustainability goals.
This pressure is driving some companies to refocus their efforts on less high-profile but more achievable initiatives, particularly in the face of data collection and transparency challenges.

Impact of Political Dynamics and the Financial Market

Current political dynamics, particularly in the U.S., are strongly influencing companies’ strategy regarding their ESG initiatives.
While 87% of executives support the integration of ESG metrics into regular reporting practices, many CEOs have revised their priorities, focusing more on inflation, artificial intelligence, and geopolitical issues, relegating ESG topics to the back burner.
At the same time, companies’ financial results are beginning to reflect the influence of these dynamics.
A growing number of listed companies have reduced references to ESG initiatives in their quarterly reports and public communications to avoid potential controversy and accusations of “greenwashing”.
For example, only 35% of individual investors consider sustainability to be a key factor in their investment decisions, illustrating a gap between the expectations of institutional investors and those of the general public.

Complexity of the Energy Transition

The energy sector, particularly affected by these dynamics, has to balance economic imperatives with climate commitments.
In Europe, 59% of large listed companies have plans in place to reduce their direct emissions or those associated with purchased energy, while in North America, only 35.6% of companies have such plans.
This difference highlights how political pressures and investor expectations can vary from region to region, influencing companies’ sustainability strategies.
In addition, challenges remain when it comes to implementing ESG initiatives, not least because of the diversity of reporting standards and data quality.
Almost 46% of investors cite a lack of reliable ESG data as a major obstacle to wider adoption of sustainable investment.
The variability of standards also makes it difficult for companies to effectively communicate their progress, which can lead to a perceived lack of transparency and consistency.

Seeking transparency and reviewing priorities

Transparency is crucial to maintaining investor confidence.
Yet less than half (40%) of investors trust the ESG scores and ratings they receive, revealing a persistent lack of trust in rating methodologies and the risk of greenwashing.
In this climate, players like James Vaccaro of Climate Safe Lending Network are calling for greater honesty.
Companies need to acknowledge their past mistakes, adjust their strategies and communicate clearly about the challenges they face.
This approach not only enhances companies’ credibility, but also provides a learning framework for the sector as a whole.
In response to this demand for transparency, some companies have begun to adopt more pragmatic approaches.
For example, instead of setting over-ambitious objectives, they are focusing on achievable and measurable targets, implementing rigorous monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.
This could help reduce the risk of greenwashing and boost investor confidence in the sincerity of ESG commitments.

The Challenge of Maintaining Investor Confidence

While the adoption of ESG initiatives is progressing, challenges persist.
76% of ESG investors are concerned about the performance of their investments, highlighting a tension between profitability and sustainability commitments.
Furthermore, 71% of investors consider the authenticity of corporate sustainability claims to be a major concern, reinforcing the need for clear communication and demonstration of concrete progress.
Communication around climate targets needs to be carefully calibrated to avoid announcements perceived as over-optimistic or unachievable, and focus on measurable, realistic commitments.
This is all the more vital in a market environment characterized by increased volatility and high interest rates.

Chinese oil giant CNOOC Limited appoints Zhang Chuanjiang as chairman, entrusting this experienced engineer to head the group's board of directors, strategic committee, and sustainability committee from July 8.
PTT Oil and Retail Business announces a 46% increase in net profit for the first quarter of 2025, driven by regional expansion in its energy and non-energy activities, alongside an integrated ESG strategy.
Shell revises downward its forecasts for the second quarter of 2025, anticipating notably a decline in Integrated Gas and Upstream segments, impacted by reduced volumes and lower profitability in several major activities.
The Luxembourg-based group will handle engineering, procurement, commissioning and installation of flexible pipelines and umbilicals to link a new field to Egypt’s existing offshore infrastructure, with offshore work scheduled for 2026.
British firm Octopus Energy is considering a £10 billion spin-off of Kraken Technologies, involving an upcoming minority stake sale, and has initiated preliminary discussions with banks to oversee the strategic operation within the next year.
Investment fund Ardian finalises its takeover of Akuo and appoints former Électricité de France executive Bruno Bensasson to steer the renewable-energy developer’s growth towards five gigawatts of installed capacity by 2030.
TotalEnergies acquires 50% of AES' renewable portfolio in the Dominican Republic following a previous purchase of 30% of similar assets in Puerto Rico, consolidating 1.5 GW of solar, wind, and battery storage capacities in the Caribbean.
TotalEnergies is selling half of a 604 MW Portuguese energy portfolio to the Japanese consortium MM Capital, Daiwa Energy and Mizuho Leasing for €178.5mn, retaining operation and future commercialisation of the assets concerned.
Shell announces amendment of two annual reports after notification by Ernst & Young of non-compliance with SEC auditor partner rotation rules; however, financial statements remain unchanged.
The Financial Superintendency of Colombia approves an amendment to Ecopetrol’s local bonds and commercial paper program, enabling issuance of sustainable, indexed, or in-kind repayable instruments.
ABO Energy is selling its subsidiary ABO Energy Hellas and an energy project portfolio of approximately 1.5 gigawatts to HELLENiQ ENERGY Holdings, thus refocusing its strategic resources towards other markets, notably Germany, without major financial impact anticipated for 2025.
Iberdrola announces a supplementary dividend of €0.409 per share for 2024 under the "Iberdrola Retribución Flexible" programme, bringing the total annual remuneration to €0.645 per share, representing a year-on-year increase of 15.6%.
BHP has signed contracts with COSCO Shipping to charter two ammonia-powered Newcastlemax bulk carriers, primarily for transporting iron ore between Western Australia and Northeast Asia starting from 2028.
CBAK Energy and Anker Innovations jointly launch a battery cell manufacturing facility in Malaysia, with a commercial potential estimated at $357 million, further strengthening their strategic partnership in the lithium-ion battery sector.
ORIX announces the sale of the majority of its stake in Greenko to AM Green Power and commits a new USD 731mn investment in the Luxembourg-based AMG holding, confirming its strategic repositioning in next-generation energy.
Invenergy seals four further contracts with Meta to supply nearly eight hundred megawatts of solar and wind power to the group’s data centres, lifting total cooperation between the two companies to one point eight gigawatts.
Pedro Azagra leaves his role as CEO of Avangrid to become CEO of Iberdrola, while Jose Antonio Miranda and Kimberly Harriman succeed him as CEO and Deputy CEO respectively of the American subsidiary.
The US investment fund Ares Management enters Plenitude's capital by acquiring a 20% stake from Eni, valuing the Italian company at 10 billion euros and reinforcing its integrated energy strategy.
ENGIE secures a contract to reduce Airbus' industrial emissions in France, Germany, and Spain, targeting an 85% decrease by 2030 through various local energy infrastructures.
Alain Rhéaume, Chairman of Boralex’s Board of Directors for eight years, will leave his position by December, following the appointment of his successor by the governance committee of the Canadian energy group.