Skip to content

British energy companies challenge Bulb’s takeover in court

Three of Octopus Energy’s competitors have filed a lawsuit in the U.K. court challenging the government-backed takeover of energy provider Bulb, which they say is opaque. They denounce the use of billions of pounds of public money to support the sale of Bulb to Octopus.

British energy companies challenge Bulb’s takeover in court

Sectors Oil, Gas
Themes Risks & Events
Companies Octopus Energy, Iberdrola, E.on, Centrica
Countries United Kingdom

Three British energy operators have filed a lawsuit in the British courts to challenge Octopus Energy’s allegedly opaque takeover of energy provider Bulb, which is on a government bailout after its bankruptcy at the end of 2021. The proceedings opened on Tuesday for three days at the High Court of Justice in London.

Challenge to the British government’s decision

Three of Octopus’ competitors –Centrica (British Gas’ parent company), E.on and Scottish Power– are challenging the British government’s decision to approve the deal in late October. In particular, they denounce the billions of pounds of public money put on the table as part of the government’s rescue plan and then the sale of Bulb, in a transaction they consider opaque, the precise terms of which have not been communicated and which enabled Octopus to recover 1.5 million customers.

Billions in subsidies for an opaque transaction

The sale of Bulb “distributes billions of pounds of taxpayer-funded subsidies but offers neither the clarity nor the transparency that the British public deserves,” E.on denounced Tuesday in a statement sent to AFP. “In the end, this agreement will add about 200 pounds (228 euros) to the energy bills of everyone in the country,” the operator estimates.

Bulb under government funding

Bulb had explained in November 2021 that it was hit by rising wholesale prices and found itself selling energy “largely at a loss” due to the UK authorities’ price cap. The group was the largest of about 30 energy suppliers to go bankrupt at that time, out of about 50 in the market, which justified direct government intervention.

Octopus was “the only (company) to submit an offer” for Bulb, the government recalled Tuesday in a statement sent to AFP, stating that the sale was officially concluded on December 20 and that the transfer of customers was currently underway.

Final cost to the public purse

Estimates of the final cost to the public purse of rescuing Bulb vary, but the state budget forecasting agency OBR put it in November at £6.5 billion. According to several media outlets, the sharp decline in energy prices on the markets over the past several months could, however, drastically reduce the final bill for the government and therefore for the taxpayer compared to initial estimates.

 

The decision will probably take several weeks, if not longer, according to a source close to the case.

Also read

Middle East conflict inflicts $25 billion in damage on energy infrastructure

The Middle East conflict has caused at least $25 billion in energy infrastructure damage across the region, according to Rystad Energy, with restoration timelines potentially exten

Middle East conflict inflicts $25 billion in damage on energy infrastructure

New Zealand Energy Corp. Reports 300 Barrels Per Day at Ngaere-2 Well

The Ngaere-2 well, located in the Taranaki Basin, delivered an initial flush production of approximately 2,500 barrels of oil before stabilizing at approximately 300 barrels per da

New Zealand Energy Corp. Reports 300 Barrels Per Day at Ngaere-2 Well

Sanctioned Russian Tanker Carrying 730,000 Barrels of Crude Heads for Cuba

The Anatoly Kolodkin, a US-sanctioned Russian tanker carrying 730,000 barrels of crude, is set to dock in Cuba, defying Washington's blockade as the island has had no oil imports s

Sanctioned Russian Tanker Carrying 730,000 Barrels of Crude Heads for Cuba