Brasilia Prepares Trade Countermeasures Amid New U.S. Tariffs of 50%

Brazil adopts new rules allowing immediate commercial measures to counter the U.S. decision to impose an exceptional 50% customs tariff on all Brazilian exports, threatening stability in bilateral trade valued at billions of dollars.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

7-Day Pass

Up to 50 articles accessible for 7 days, with no automatic renewal

3 $/week*

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles/month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 30,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

Following the American announcement of a sweeping increase in tariffs affecting all Brazilian exports, the Brazilian government has published a decree expanding its regulatory arsenal for trade retaliation. This immediately applicable text provides the country with a clear legal framework to proportionately respond to protectionist measures by foreign trading partners. Although not explicitly naming the United States, the decree openly addresses the recent decision to impose a 50% customs duty, which Brasilia considers a major turning point in trade tensions.

An Unprecedented Regulatory Framework

The new Brazilian decree is based on the Trade Reciprocity Law (Lei da Reciprocidade Comercial), which came into force earlier this year, allowing the country to suspend existing tariff concessions, restrict certain foreign investments, and even reassess intellectual property obligations in response to unjustified trade barriers. This legal measure supplements diplomatic efforts and explicitly authorizes coercive measures following unsuccessful preliminary negotiations. Practically, an interministerial commission chaired by the vice president and industry minister will be tasked with evaluating the severity of foreign measures and applying appropriate sanctions.

Potential Impact on Key Economic Sectors

While the initial shock affects all Brazilian export sectors, specific areas such as agro-industry, metallurgy, and biofuels could experience the most significant disruptions. Historically, the U.S. market represents a substantial part of the commercial outlets for these sectors, though dependence has decreased over recent years. For instance, Brazilian ethanol exports to the United States currently account for only 17% of the country’s total foreign ethanol sales, down from more than 70% seven years ago. Brazilian producers thus appear prepared for such measures, having already shifted their strategy toward other markets, notably in Asia.

Concerns Among American Businesses

On the U.S. side, several major professional organizations, including the leading business federation, are sounding the alarm about the negative repercussions of this emerging trade war. According to these groups, the significant increase in tariffs on Brazilian imports could severely impact American supply chains. They emphasize that thousands of American SMEs directly depend on these exchanges, particularly in the manufacturing and agri-food sectors. Consequently, the final cost to American consumers could rise substantially, while the competitiveness of domestic companies could erode further amid an already unstable economic environment.

An Escalation with Unpredictable Consequences

As both governments harden their positions, economic uncertainties intensify. Although the Brazilian decree prioritizes diplomatic routes before any actual sanctions, the current situation raises genuine fears of escalation. Businesses from both nations are already questioning the long-term implications of such a standoff, both in terms of market access and their ability to maintain a bilateral relationship that has been strategic for decades. Far from calming tensions, Brazil’s newly established legal framework sends a clear message about Brasilia’s determination to no longer passively endure measures perceived as hostile to its economic interests.

The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.
Athens and Tripoli engage in a negotiation process to define their exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean, amid geopolitical tensions and underwater energy stakes.
European powers demand concrete steps from Tehran on nuclear issue or United Nations sanctions will be reinstated, as IAEA inspections remain blocked and tensions with Washington persist.
Brussels confirms its target to end all Russian energy imports by 2028, despite growing diplomatic pressure from Washington amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump threatens to escalate US sanctions against Russia, but only if NATO member states stop all Russian oil imports, which remain active via certain pipelines.
The two countries agreed to develop infrastructure dedicated to liquefied natural gas to strengthen Europe's energy security and boost transatlantic trade.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.
The United States cuts tariffs on Japanese imports to 15%, while Tokyo launches a massive investment plan targeting American energy, industry, and agriculture.

All the latest energy news, all the time

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

7 DAY PASS

Up to 50 items can be consulted for 7 days,
without automatic renewal

3$/week*

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.