America’s New Course on Enriched Uranium: Implications and Adaptations

The new US law banning Russian enriched uranium means major adjustments for nuclear operators, prompting questions and adaptation strategies.

Share:

Sénat américain Uranium russe

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The U.S. Senate has unanimously approved legislation banning the import of enriched uranium from Russia, in direct response to that country’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The legislation, which will take effect 90 days after President Joe Biden’s signature, seeks to reduce U.S. dependence onRussian uranium, which accounts for around 20% of the enrichment needs of U.S. reactor operators. Although the majority of utilities have already begun to reduce their dependence on Rosatom, Russia’s state-owned nuclear company, this law poses significant new logistical and compliance challenges for the industry.

Complexities of the Override System

The central element of the new legislation is the introduction of a system of derogations that would allow certain players to continue receiving enriched uranium from Russia under specific conditions. The Department of Energy (DOE) announced at a meeting on April 30 that it would be prepared to publish a notice in the Federal Register explaining the terms of these waivers within 30 days of the law taking effect. Companies will have to demonstrate that they have no viable alternative sources or that continued deliveries are in the US national interest. However, skepticism reigned among meeting participants as to the department’s preparedness to manage this complex process in such a short timeframe, given the multiple nuances and tight schedule associated with this transition.

Sector reactions and adaptation strategies

The prospect of having to navigate a new regulatory framework has sent shockwaves through the industry. Reactor operators and fuel suppliers are questioning the transparency of the process and the publicizing of the names of entities receiving waivers, which could have significant commercial and reputational implications. In addition, concerns have been expressed about the ability of utilities to maintain stable supplies, particularly those with uranium shipments already en route to the USA. DOE officials tried to reassure participants by indicating a flexible approach, especially during the first years of implementation, but many remain uncertain about the feasibility of these plans in the short term.

International Impact and Future Perspectives

As the United States seeks to free itself from Russian uranium, the impact of this law is being felt far beyond its borders. Foreign entities using US services to process Russian uranium will also have to navigate this new regime of waivers. This situation highlights the complexity of the global uranium supply chain and the challenges of reconfiguring these networks in response to political developments. DOE officials also emphasized the importance of the U.S. Assured Nuclear Fuel Reserve, a government stockpile of enriched uranium, as a buffer against supply disruptions, underscoring the strategic importance of diversifying nuclear energy sources.

Ambassadors of European Union member states have approved the transmission of a legislative proposal to phase out Russian fossil fuel imports by January 2028 to the Council of Ministers.
The State Duma has approved Russia’s formal withdrawal from a treaty signed with the United States on the elimination of military-grade plutonium, ending over two decades of strategic nuclear cooperation.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was not in Poland’s interest to extradite to Germany a Ukrainian citizen suspected of taking part in the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipelines in 2022.
Al-Harfi and SCLCO signed agreements with Syrian authorities to develop solar and wind capacity, amid an ongoing energy rapprochement between Riyadh and Damascus.
Faced with risks to Middle Eastern supply chains, Thai and Japanese refiners are turning to US crude, backed by tariff incentives and strategies aligned with ongoing bilateral trade discussions.
France intercepted a tanker linked to Russian exports, prompting Emmanuel Macron to call for a coordinated European response to hinder vessels bypassing oil sanctions.
The activation of the snapback mechanism reinstates all UN sanctions on Iran, directly affecting the defence, financial and maritime trade sectors.
Commissioner Dan Jørgensen visits Greenland to expand energy ties with the European Union, amid plans to double EU funding for the 2028–2034 period.
European and Iranian foreign ministers meet in New York to try to prevent the reinstatement of UN sanctions linked to Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announces a bilateral agreement with Mexico including targeted investments in energy corridors, logistics infrastructure and cross-border security.
The US president has called for an immediate end to Russian oil imports by NATO countries, denouncing a strategic contradiction as sanctions against Moscow are being considered.
Tehran withdrew a resolution denouncing attacks on its nuclear facilities, citing US pressure on IAEA members who feared suspension of Washington’s voluntary contributions.
Poland’s energy minister calls on European Union member states to collectively commit to halting Russian oil purchases within two years, citing increasing geopolitical risks.
Athens and Tripoli engage in a negotiation process to define their exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean, amid geopolitical tensions and underwater energy stakes.
European powers demand concrete steps from Tehran on nuclear issue or United Nations sanctions will be reinstated, as IAEA inspections remain blocked and tensions with Washington persist.
Brussels confirms its target to end all Russian energy imports by 2028, despite growing diplomatic pressure from Washington amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump threatens to escalate US sanctions against Russia, but only if NATO member states stop all Russian oil imports, which remain active via certain pipelines.
The two countries agreed to develop infrastructure dedicated to liquefied natural gas to strengthen Europe's energy security and boost transatlantic trade.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei calls for modernising the oil industry and expanding export markets as Tehran faces the possible reactivation of 2015 nuclear deal sanctions.
The Ukrainian president demanded that Slovakia end its imports of Russian crude, offering an alternative supply solution amid ongoing war and growing diplomatic tensions over the Druzhba pipeline.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25$/month*

*billed annually at 99$/year for the first year then 149,00$/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2$/month*
then 14.90$ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.