The EU proposal to ban Russian gas fuels uncertainty for the European market

The European Commission has unveiled a proposal to prohibit the import of Russian gas into the Union, sparking intense debate on its feasibility, contractual impact and consequences for supply security among several Member States.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

The publication by the European Commission of a draft regulation aiming to eliminate all Russian gas imports, including pipeline and LNG, by the end of 2027 marks a major turning point in the bloc’s energy policy. The text introduces two main bans: one on the import of Russian gas, the other on the provision of long-term LNG terminal services to Russian clients. The new rules would apply to contracts signed after the proposal’s publication from 1 January 2026, with transition periods for earlier agreements extending to 1 January 2028.

Major contractual and legal consequences

The proposal raises considerable contractual questions. The European executive suggests that the ban should be recognised as a force majeure event, but offers no guarantee as to the validity of this argument before international arbitration courts. Moreover, the text does not clarify whether suspension of deliveries is sufficient to comply with the regulation or whether formal contract termination would be required, leaving importers exposed to potential financial or legal claims.

The restrictions apply to all contracts, both long-term and spot, some extending as far as 2041. Contract amendments made after the publication of the draft would be treated as new agreements and thus subject to the ban from 2026. This arrangement limits the ability of buyers and sellers to adjust by negotiation, increasing the risk of legal confrontation.

Strengthened transparency measures for imports

The European Commission is demanding an unprecedented level of transparency on import contracts. Companies will have to provide customs authorities and the Commission with detailed information on volumes, contractual clauses and the traceability of gas molecules. Any import via certain interconnection points will be considered Russian, unless “unambiguous” evidence to the contrary is provided, which could complicate market access for some flows, especially in Central and Eastern Europe.

LNG terminal operators are also subject to reporting obligations concerning their services to Russian entities. Import refusal may be pronounced by customs authorities if the submitted documentation is not deemed satisfactory, creating uncertainty for many players.

National diversification plans and divergent situations

Member States will have to submit national diversification plans by March 2026, detailing how they will remove Russian gas from their energy mix. According to the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies report, several countries such as Hungary, Slovakia or Austria have already expressed strong reservations, criticising the lack of economic impact assessment and highlighting their infrastructure’s dependence on Russian supplies.

In case of disagreement on these plans or on the reality of their implementation, the proposal provides no mechanism for conflict resolution, leaving the door open to ongoing divergence. The Commission may nonetheless recommend adjustments, but States retain considerable leeway.

Limited impact on volumes but price increases expected

According to market simulations, the withdrawal of Russian gas could be offset by other sources, notably a massive influx of US LNG, without causing major shortages. Nevertheless, this reorganisation would result in a moderate price increase, estimated at around $0.20 to $0.35/MMBTU for major European hubs over the 2028-2035 period. Central European countries such as Hungary remain particularly exposed to any incident at their alternative import points.

According to the report, “the proposal imposes strong regulatory pressure, without guaranteeing the effective cessation of all affected contracts by the required deadlines” (OIES reported in July 2025).

Argentina aims to boost gas sales to Brazil by 2030, but high transit fees imposed by Bolivia require significant public investment to secure alternative routes.
The accelerated arrival of Russian cargoes in China has lowered Asian spot LNG prices, but traffic is set to slow with the seasonal closure of the Northern Sea Route.
Nigeria and Libya have initiated technical discussions on a new pipeline project to transport Nigerian gas to Europe through the Mediterranean network.
Shipments of liquefied natural gas and higher pipeline flows strengthen China’s gas optionality, while testing the sanctions regime and reshaping price–volume trade-offs for the next decade.
The Canadian government aims to reduce approval delays for strategic projects, including liquefied natural gas, nuclear and mining operations, amid growing trade tensions with the United States.
Liquefied natural gas exports in sub-Saharan Africa will reach 98 bcm by 2034, driven by Nigeria, Mozambique, and the entry of new regional producers.
Backed by an ambitious public investment plan, Angola is betting on gas to offset declining oil output, but the Angola LNG plant in Soyo continues to face operational constraints.
Finnish President Alexander Stubb denounced fossil fuel imports from Russia by Hungary and Slovakia as the EU prepares its 19th sanctions package against Moscow.
Japanese giant JERA has signed a letter of intent to purchase one million tonnes of LNG per year from Alaska, as part of a strategic energy agreement with the United States.
US-based Chevron has submitted a bid with HelleniQ Energy to explore four offshore blocks south of Crete, marking a new strategic step in gas exploration in the Eastern Mediterranean.
GTT has been selected by Samsung Heavy Industries to design cryogenic tanks for a floating natural gas liquefaction unit, scheduled for deployment at an offshore site in Africa.
A consortium led by BlackRock is in talks to raise up to $10.3 billion to finance a gas infrastructure deal with Aramco, including a dual-tranche loan structure and potential sukuk issuance.
TotalEnergies commits to Train 4 of the Rio Grande LNG project in Texas, consolidating its position in liquefied natural gas with a 10% direct stake and a 1.5 Mtpa offtake agreement.
US producer EQT has secured a twenty-year liquefied natural gas supply contract with Commonwealth LNG, tied to a Gulf Coast terminal under development.
Monkey Island LNG has awarded McDermott the design of a gas terminal with a potential capacity of 26 MTPA, using a modular format to increase on-site output density and reduce execution risks.
The Voskhod and Zarya vessels, targeted by Western sanctions, departed China’s Beihai terminal after potentially offloading liquefied natural gas from the Arctic LNG 2 project.
ADNOC Gas will join the FTSE Emerging Index on September 22, potentially unlocking up to $250mn in liquidity, according to market projections.
Norwegian company BlueNord has revised downward its production forecasts for the Tyra gas field for the third quarter, following unplanned outages and more impactful maintenance than anticipated.
Monkey Island LNG adopts ConocoPhillips' Optimized Cascade® process for its 26 MTPA terminal in Louisiana, establishing a technology partnership focused on operational efficiency and competitive gas export pricing.
NextDecade has signed a liquefied natural gas supply agreement with EQT for 1.5 million tonnes annually from Rio Grande LNG Train 5, pending a final investment decision.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.