Petrobras moves forward with Amazon exploration plans, but uncertainty over future permits persists

Petrobras reaches a crucial milestone for exploring the Foz do Amazonas basin, yet stringent conditions for upcoming permits raise questions about future operations in this strategic region.

Share:

Comprehensive energy news coverage, updated nonstop

Annual subscription

8.25€/month*

*billed annually at 99€/year for the first year then 149,00€/year ​

Unlimited access • Archives included • Professional invoice

OTHER ACCESS OPTIONS

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2€/month*
then 14.90€ per month thereafter

FREE ACCOUNT

3 articles offered per month

FREE

*Prices are excluding VAT, which may vary depending on your location or professional status

Since 2021: 35,000 articles • 150+ analyses per week

The Brazilian oil industry reached a significant turning point following a recent decision by Brazil’s environmental agency, Ibama, allowing Petrobras to continue its exploration project in the offshore Foz do Amazonas basin. This region, located near the mouth of the Amazon River, is strategically important for the discovery of new oil reserves, though it raises substantial environmental concerns. While Petrobras has achieved a partial victory, uncertainties remain regarding future exploration permits.

A partial victory for Petrobras

On May 19, 2025, Ibama approved a test plan proposed by Petrobras aimed at assessing its emergency response system in case of an oil spill. This test, which intends to protect local wildlife, represents significant progress for Petrobras, albeit under stringent conditions. The plan includes measures to mitigate the impact on coastal Indigenous communities and extensive coral reefs present in this area. Petrobras welcomed the decision, viewing it as a necessary step before submitting a final exploration permit request.

The impact of environmental concerns on future permits

The Foz do Amazonas basin is particularly valuable due to its geology, which shares similarities with the neighboring oil fields in Guyana, where ExxonMobil is currently developing significant projects. However, Rodrigo Agostinho, head of Ibama, expressed reservations about issuing further exploration permits in this region. He emphasized the difficulty of granting “fragmented and successive” permits without a thorough environmental impact assessment, specifically an AAAS (Complex Environmental Impact Assessment), which could take several years to complete.

The implications of the AAAS study for Petrobras

The AAAS study represents a potential obstacle for Petrobras, as it would require considerable resources and time to complete properly. Ibama had initially requested this study before deciding on Petrobras’ exploration request, but a legal opinion from Brazil’s solicitor-general concluded that delays in completing this study should not impede permit issuance. Nevertheless, Agostinho’s renewed request adds another layer of uncertainty for Petrobras, forcing the company to navigate an increasingly complex regulatory environment.

The political context surrounding oil exploration

The current situation highlights political tensions within the Brazilian government regarding natural resource exploitation in the Amazon region. Influential voices support exploration projects as a means to stimulate economic growth and meet rising energy demand. Conversely, environmental advocates stress the need to protect this fragile area, home to some of the planet’s last significant biodiversity zones. These tensions intensified after Petrobras’ exploration application was rejected in 2023, prompting an immediate appeal from the company.

The future of oil exploration in the Amazon

Uncertainty regarding future exploration permits in the Foz do Amazonas remains high, especially as Brazil’s government prepares for a new round of exploration block auctions scheduled for June 2025. Investors and industry players closely monitor this situation, recognizing its potential implications for future regional development. Ibama’s decisions concerning offshore exploration could also shape investment trajectories in Brazil’s oil sector.

Internal tensions within Ibama and future exploration permits

Ibama’s favorable decision towards Petrobras also highlights internal divisions within the agency. In February 2025, Ibama’s technical experts signed a document stating Petrobras’ wildlife protection plan had a “very low probability” of success. This divergence of opinions within the agency underscores tensions within the Brazilian administration, particularly between proponents of natural resource development and those advocating stronger environmental protection measures.

The United Kingdom is replacing its exceptional tax with a permanent price mechanism, maintaining one of the world’s highest fiscal pressures and reshaping the North Sea’s investment attractiveness for oil and gas operators.
Pakistan confirms its exit from domestic fuel oil with over 1.4 Mt exported in 2025, transforming its refineries into export platforms as Asia faces a structural surplus of high- and low-sulphur fuel oil.
Turkish company Aksa Enerji has signed a 20-year contract with Sonabel for the commissioning of a thermal power plant in Ouagadougou, aiming to strengthen Burkina Faso’s energy supply by the end of 2026.
The Caspian Pipeline Consortium resumed loadings in Novorossiisk after a Ukrainian attack, but geopolitical tensions persist over Kazakh oil flows through this strategic Black Sea corridor.
Hungary increases oil product exports to Serbia to offset the imminent shutdown of the NIS refinery, threatened by US sanctions over its Russian majority ownership.
Faced with falling oil production, Pemex is expanding local refining through Olmeca, aiming to reduce fuel imports and optimise its industrial capacity under fiscal pressure.
Brazil’s state oil company will reduce its capital spending by 2%, hit by falling crude prices, marking a strategic shift under Lula’s presidency.
TotalEnergies has finalised the sale of its 12.5% stake in Nigeria’s offshore Bonga oilfield for $510mn, boosting Shell and Eni’s positions in the strategic deepwater production site.
Serbia is preparing a budget law amendment to enable the takeover of NIS, a refinery under US sanctions and owned by Russian groups, to avoid an imminent energy shutdown.
Nigeria’s Dangote refinery selects US-based Honeywell to supply technology that will double its crude processing capacity and expand its petrochemical output.
Iraq secures production by bypassing US sanctions through local payments, energy-for-energy swaps, and targeted suspension of financial flows to Lukoil to protect West Qurna-2 exports.
Restarting Olympic Pipeline’s 16-inch line does not restore full supply to Oregon and Seattle-Tacoma airport, both still exposed to logistical risks and regional price tensions.
Faced with tightened sanctions from the United States and European Union, Indian refiners are drastically reducing their purchases of Russian crude from December, according to industry sources.
Serbia’s only refinery, operated by NIS, may be forced to halt production this week, weakened by US sanctions targeting its Russian shareholders.
Glencore's attributable production in Cameroon dropped by 31% over nine months, adding pressure on public revenues as Yaoundé revises its oil and budget forecasts amid field maturity and targeted investment shifts.
The profitability of speculative positioning strategies on Brent is declining, while contrarian approaches targeting extreme sentiment levels are proving more effective, marking a significant regime shift in oil trading.
Alaska is set to record its highest oil production increase in 40 years, driven by two key projects that extend the operational life of the TAPS pipeline and reinforce the United States' strategic presence in the Arctic.
TotalEnergies increases its stake to 90% in Nigeria’s offshore block OPL257 following an asset exchange deal with Conoil Producing Limited.
TotalEnergies and Chevron are seeking to acquire a 40% stake in the Mopane oil field in Namibia, owned by Galp, as part of a strategy to secure new resources in a high-potential offshore basin.
The reduction of Rosneft’s stake in Kurdistan Pipeline Company shifts control of the main Kurdish oil pipeline and recalibrates the balance between US sanctions, export financing and regional crude governance.

All the latest energy news, all the time

Annual subscription

8.25€/month*

*billed annually at 99€/year for the first year then 149,00€/year ​

Unlimited access - Archives included - Pro invoice

Monthly subscription

Unlimited access • Archives included

5.2€/month*
then 14.90€ per month thereafter

*Prices shown are exclusive of VAT, which may vary according to your location or professional status.

Since 2021: 30,000 articles - +150 analyses/week.