Trump in Power: A Threat to the Fight Against Climate Change

Donald Trump's election in the United States, with his open climate skepticism, could reverse American environmental commitments, jeopardizing global climate goals and increasing greenhouse gas emissions.

Share:

Gain full professional access to energynews.pro from 4.90$/month.
Designed for decision-makers, with no long-term commitment.

Over 30,000 articles published since 2021.
150 new market analyses every week to decode global energy trends.

Monthly Digital PRO PASS

Immediate Access
4.90$/month*

No commitment – cancel anytime, activation in 2 minutes.

*Special launch offer: 1st month at the indicated price, then 14.90 $/month, no long-term commitment.

Annual Digital PRO Pass

Full Annual Access
99$/year*

To access all of energynews.pro without any limits

*Introductory annual price for year one, automatically renewed at 149.00 $/year from the second year.

Donald Trump’s election as President of the United States marks a turning point for global climate policy. As the world’s second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases, the United States plays a key role in climate negotiations and emission reduction commitments. However, Trump’s re-election could weaken these efforts and profoundly shift the global outlook on combating climate change.

Trump’s position, favoring the oil sector and skeptical of climate change, contrasts sharply with the policies of his predecessor, Joe Biden, who had strengthened initiatives to curb carbon emissions. During his campaign, Trump promised a massive expansion of oil drilling and questioned the reality of climate change, emphasizing the significance of America’s natural resources. According to him, the U.S. possesses greater reserves of oil and gas than Saudi Arabia or Russia, which, in his words, should be fully exploited.

International Implications of U.S. Climate Policy

A U.S. withdrawal from climate commitments could encourage other nations to reconsider their own targets. Starting in January, Trump could restart the process of withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, a move that would severely weaken global commitments. Signed in 2015, this agreement aimed at ambitious reductions in greenhouse gas emissions to keep climate change within an acceptable range. The U.S. had pledged to halve its emissions by 2030, a goal that would be harder to achieve with this shift in policy.

Laurence Tubiana, architect of the Paris Agreement, warns of the risk of “contagion” from this decision: a U.S. withdrawal might influence other major economies, such as China and India, to scale back their climate efforts as well.

Direct Consequences for CO2 Emissions

A recent analysis by Carbon Brief suggests that a Trump presidency could lead to an increase of 4 billion tons of CO2 equivalent by 2030 compared to projections under a Democratic administration, equivalent to the combined annual emissions of Europe and Japan. This rise in emissions would have a direct impact on global warming, further undermining climate stability.

Revoking Environmental Standards

Trump has committed to repealing regulations imposed by the Biden administration, particularly those concerning coal-fired power plants and vehicle emissions. Restrictions aimed at accelerating the shift to electric vehicles could be lifted, slowing the adoption of renewable energy in transportation. Additionally, he plans to lift the moratorium on natural gas liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals, giving a further boost to fossil fuel industries.

Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) policy, which allocated massive investments in clean energy, could also be rolled back. Trump plans to cancel any unspent funds from this act, thereby ending tax credits and investments in green infrastructure. However, these changes would likely face legal challenges, with proceedings expected to last months, if not years.

Impacts on Vulnerable Countries

The abandonment of U.S. climate initiatives would have profound consequences, especially for nations most vulnerable to climate impacts. Leah Stokes, a political scientist and climate expert, points out that U.S. disengagement threatens global efforts to mitigate the devastating effects of climate change, such as hurricanes and rising sea levels, which primarily impact poorer countries.

Joyce Banda, former president of Malawi, also expresses her concerns for developing nations, often the first to suffer from natural disasters. She emphasizes that these countries, although less responsible for global emissions, bear the brunt of climate disruptions.

Climate, a Key Issue for the Future

As the world enters a critical decade to limit global warming, U.S. climate policy could shape international decisions. Johan Rockström, of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, warns that the next four years could represent a “pause the world cannot afford.” U.S. leadership on climate issues is therefore a determining factor for the future of the Paris Agreement and the global energy transition.

A sudden fault on the national grid cut electricity supply to several regions of Nigeria, reigniting concerns about the stability of the transmission system.
Re-elected president Irfaan Ali announces stricter production-sharing agreements to increase national economic returns.
Coal India issues tenders to develop 5 GW of renewable capacity, split between solar and wind, as part of its long-term energy strategy.
US utilities anticipate a rapid increase in high-intensity loads, targeting 147 GW of new capacity by 2035, with a strategic shift toward deregulated markets.
France opens a national consultation on RTE’s plan to invest €100 billion by 2040 to modernise the high-voltage electricity transmission grid.
Governor Gavin Newsom orders state agencies to fast-track clean energy projects to capture Inflation Reduction Act credits before deadlines expire.
Germany’s energy transition could cost up to €5.4tn ($6.3tn) by 2049, according to the main industry organisation, raising concerns over national competitiveness.
Facing blackouts imposed by the authorities, small businesses in Iran record mounting losses amid drought, fuel shortages and pressure on the national power grid.
Russian group T Plus plans to stabilise its electricity output at 57.6 TWh in 2025, despite a decline recorded in the first half of the year, according to Chief Executive Officer Pavel Snikkars.
In France, the Commission de régulation de l’énergie issues a clarification on ten statements shared over the summer, correcting several figures regarding tariffs, production and investments in the electricity sector.
A group of 85 researchers challenges the scientific validity of the climate report released by the US Department of Energy, citing partial methods and the absence of independent peer review.
Five energy infrastructure projects have been added to the list of cross-border renewable projects, making them eligible for financial support under the CEF Energy programme.
The Tanzanian government launches a national consultation to accelerate the rollout of compressed natural gas, mobilising public and private financing to secure energy supply and lower fuel costs.
The Kuwaiti government has invited three international consortia to submit bids for the first phase of the Al Khairan project, combining power generation and desalination.
Nigeria’s state-owned oil company abandons plans to sell the Port Harcourt refinery and confirms a maintenance programme despite high operating costs.
The publication of the Multiannual Energy Programme decree, awaited for two years, is compromised by internal political tensions, jeopardising strategic investments in nuclear and renewables.
The US Energy Information Administration reschedules or cancels several publications, affecting the availability of critical data for oil, gas and renewables markets.
Brazilian authorities have launched a large-scale operation targeting a money laundering system linked to the fuel sector, involving investment funds, fintechs, and more than 1,000 service stations across the country.
A national study by the Davies Group reveals widespread American support for the simultaneous development of both renewable and fossil energy sources, with strong approval for natural gas and solar energy.
The South Korean government compels ten petrochemical groups to cut up to 3.7 million tons of naphtha cracking per year, tying financial and tax support to swift and documented restructuring measures.

Log in to read this article

You'll also have access to a selection of our best content.